Not exact matches
A
joint review by the inspector of prisons and the chief inspector of borders and immigration said the medical reports on torture survivors were «often perfunctory» and «contain no objective
assessment».
In the next
assessment, in 1996, the
review panels will be instructed to «give full recognition to research work of direct relevance to the needs of industry and commerce», says a
joint statement from the councils.
A new
joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) provides an
assessment of evidence on ctDNA tests in oncology.
To assist school leaders in understanding the risks to schools and how best to address these, the NEU, NAHT and ASCL have published
joint guidance to answer common questions and advise on how best to
review fire risk
assessments to ensure that children and staff are kept safe.
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and support • Early identification of need: health and development
review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH
joint policy statement on the early years; tickell
review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory
assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory
assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit for current statutory
assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more control over support and funding for their child: individual budget by 2014 for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference for a state - funded school • Short breaks for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
He also has experience in inter partes
review proceedings, drafting and negotiating
joint development agreements, preparing opinions and freedom to operate
assessments, and patent litigation support for a variety of clients, large and small, covering a broad range of industries.
We also include within the definition an organized system of health care in which more than one covered entity participates, and in which the participating covered entities hold themselves out to the public as participating in a
joint arrangement, and in which the
joint activities of the participating covered entities include at least one of the following: utilization
review, in which health care decisions by participating covered entities are
reviewed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf; quality
assessment and improvement activities, in which treatment provided by participating covered entities is assessed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf; or payment activities, if the financial risk for delivering health care is shared in whole or in part by participating covered entities through the
joint arrangement and if protected health information created or received by a covered entity is
reviewed by other participating covered entities or by a third party on their behalf for the purpose of administering the sharing of financial risk.
In particular, the FCA reasoned that because the outcome of the environmental
assessment and regulatory
review (the report of the Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the r
review (the report of the
Joint Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial review lay from the r
Review Panel in this case) was merely a recommendation to Cabinet under the new legislative scheme, «no decisions about legal or practical interests had been made» and thus no application for judicial
review lay from the r
review lay from the report.
Ongoing pipeline
reviews: While there is a strong argument that the FCA may have applied the wrong sections of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 in Gitxaala (given that the Enbridge
Joint Review Panel was operating under transitional rules), the analysis of the FCA is certainly applicable to more recent environmental
assessments conducted by the National Energy Board — like those for the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain and Energy East oil tanker and pipeline projects.