Damage Awards in Internet Defamation Cases: Reassessing
Assumptions About the Credibility of Online Speech (Alberta Law Review)
Not exact matches
Findings in this heavily litigated area are often predicated on erroneous clinical
assumptions such as: that doctors accept uncritically and at face value what the client says
about their history (HE (DRC —
credibility and psychiatric reports) Democratic Republic of Congo [2004] UKIAT 00321); that only psychiatrists can diagnose conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (HH (Ethiopia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 306, [2007] All ER (D) 259 (Mar)-RRB-; and that doctors do not consider alternative explanations, including fabrication when, in fact, this is integrated into medical training and has always been a specified requirement of the IP (para 105 (f)-RRB-.
He also criticized the judge on how he had assessed Mr. Ururyar's
credibility in the trial, saying: «All witnesses, and not just rape complainants, are entitled to have their
credibility assessed on the basis of the evidence in the case, rather than on
assumptions about human behaviour derived from a trial judge's personal reading of social science literature.»