Sentences with phrase «at the inquest hearing»

Not exact matches

The inquest heard how, on the morning of the attack, Cornick told a number of children what he planned to do and also how he wanted to kill two other teachers at the school.

The inquest heard Tate Spencer - Koch had a partial water birth at her parents» home in 2007 but died from complications after getting stuck during the delivery.

Inquest begins we hear evidence about Benjamin being treated on the pitch, at no stage was he removed to be assessed.

She has also attended inquests and disciplinary hearings at both the General Medical Council and the General Dental Council.

Supported by national charity INQUEST the hearing will explore the care issues in prisons at Drake Hall and Peterborough after Sarah Burke died 8... Read more»

We view our role at an inquest or inquiry as focused on ensuring that our clients are effectively represented, while understanding that the public component of these hearings provides a rare opportunity for our clients to participate in the development of law and policy that will affect their personal and professional lives.

Our solicitors can represent you at inquests, to help guide you through proceedings and to make sure your voice is heard.

He also frequently acts for clients on coroner's inquests and at hearings involving regulatory and enforcement proceedings.

Although the fans were conclusively exonerated, there should be legislation to make it clear that such evidence can be heard at inquests.

In January 2007, the defendant convened a pre-inquest hearing, at which she determined that: (i) the inquests should be held concurrently; (ii) she had jurisdiction to act as the deputy coroner of the Queen's household; (iii) she would conduct the inquests without a jury; and (iv) the inquest into Al Fayed would be transferred to her jurisdiction as coroner of the Queen's household, pursuant to CA 1988, s 14.

The Home Secretary, Theresa May's application to have a closed hearing for sensitive evidence at the July 7 inquest failed because it would have meant a jury hearing evidence that the family could not.

The basis on which it was argued at the instant hearing that a lesser standard of proof might be appropriate was that the standard of proof of unlawful killing needed to be revisited when the inquest was intended to be the mechanism by which the obligation under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) was to be discharged.