Sentences with phrase «at least the author did»

Not exact matches

This one statistic alone should make all employers more interested in boosting bliss: Truly cheerful employees spend about 80 % of their time at work doing what they're there to do; the least content spend only 40 % of their time on job - related activities, according to a survey by workplace happiness consultant and author Jessica Pryce - Jones.

And yet very few of them said yeah, pay me $ 2 and I'd be happy to do word puzzles»cause at least I'll be having fun,» Peter Ubel, an author of the study and a professor of marketing and public policy at Duke University, told NPR.

Women who used sprays or other cleaning products at least once per week had a more accelerated decline than women who didn't, the study authors wrote.

The study authors suggest that the prime takeaway is that cutting yourself some slack about, well, slacking off is good for you (at least if you're tightly wound), or, as BPS puts it, «the people who could most benefit from the restorative effects of lounge - based downtime... are the least likely to do so.»

The following statistic alone should make all employers more interested in boosting bliss: Truly cheerful employees spend about 80 % of their time at work doing what they're there to do (even happy people need an Instagram break); the least content spend only 40 % of their day on job - related activities, according to a survey by workplace happiness consultant and author Jessica Pryce - Jones.

It would be great to see the author maintain an up to date set of data (or at least checked links) on his website for the book and guarantee to do this for as long as the book is on sale at least.

The author above at least made an attempt at doing so about the myths in this article.

The author argues that the view that the process account rests on experiences in some sense while other metaphysical and theological accounts do not, is at the very least thoroughly misleading, and at the very worst quite false.

Because there are others who believe the same way I do, and we have the best Bible scholars, and the best seminaries, and the biggest churches, and the most authors, and our missionaries are very active overseas, and we agree with most of the teachings of the church throughout history... at least since the Reformation anyway... and I believe that with time, and a little education of how to really study the Bible, people will eventually see that what I believe is the right way to believe.

Actually, I think the most accurate would be to state that the anonymous author who wrote the gospel of John attributed those words to Jesus that he or she received second hand (or more) and didn't bother to put into writing until at least many decades after the words were said.

2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiat the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hiAt the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

That, at least, is what the author of the article and, though not so assertively, the scientists who produced the study, have done.

The way I interpreted the article was that AA is designed to fix the later by instilling the former, and the author was just saying that this isn't necessary, and that people who want to find help don't necessarily need to find religion (or at the very least, not Christianity).

The new article's authors claim the original scholar committed «classification errors» because some of the same - sex relationships were very brief, even evanescent affairs, and so what he should have done is what they proceed to do: toss out data until they get a handful of same - sex households where a couple stayed together at least several years.

Nor do the authors pick up on the same pope's astonishing invitation of the leaders of other churches and their theologians to a «patient and fraternal dialogue» to help find ways in which the pastoral and doctrinal ministry of Peter might be differently exercised in the service of universal Christian unity» a move that opened the prospect of a «reformed papacy» such as Luther, at least, was willing to contemplate.

Then again, what does it say about the coherence of those intentions when, by Hamburger's own account, at least three of our first seven presidents, including an influential drafter of the Constitution and the author of the Declaration of Independence, seem to have held separationist views outside the mainstream of their time?

The author states «We don't know the reason God allows evil and suffering to continue, or why it is so random, but now at least we know what the reason isn't, what it can't be.

A LOT of us don't see the same appeal in Jackson (or at least not at this time) and, as requested by the author, we've expressed that.

however as the author says some of the blame has to be apportioned to the fanz who create a toxic atmosphere... anyone believing that did not cost at least the point we needed for CL is deluded.

[1 - 9] As a 2013 research paper [7] and a number of other recent studies [12 - 15] show, education alone (or at least that which focuses on educating athletes about the signs and symptoms of concussion and not changing attitudes about reporting behavior) does not appear capable of solving the problem, because the reasons for under - reporting are largely cultural, [2,3,9,10, 12 - 15] leading the paper's author to conclude that «other approaches might be needed to identify injured athletes.»

Having so much on your plate, author, blogger, neuroscientist, homeschooler, and obviously Big Bang Theory, and with attachment parenting being the most hands - on parenting philosophy, at least the most hands - on I know of, how do you strive for balance?

I have to decide which collection of book by an author I'll do, but it will be at least 5 books.

The authors report that 31 women (38.3 percent) who did not breastfeed exclusively had MS relapse within the first six months postpartum compared with 29 women (24.2 percent) who intended to breastfeed exclusively for at least two months.

In at least one case, the authors of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the journal's editors invited the fake review instead.

«Our findings mean that Maynard Smith's theory does apply to this complex natural system, and sexual females do pay at least a two-fold cost of sex,» said Dr. Amanda Gibson, lead author of the Evolution Letters study.

The 35 percent lower rate of endophthalmitis seen in Avastin wasn't statistically significant, but the authors say the data at least suggest strongly that on a nationwide basis, Avastin repackaged by compounding pharmacies doesn't involve greater endophthalmitis risk than Lucentis packaged by its manufacturer.

Studies were included if their authors provided the requisite original data, they comprised adult outpatients, they included a medication vs placebo comparison for at least 6 weeks, they did not exclude patients on the basis of a placebo washout period, and they used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).

Okay, this one's a bit of a long shot, but a number of authors are willing to at least to do a Skype conversation with book and cookbook clubs.

According to a local Michigan author, 97.5 % of the almost 300 online daters she interviewed did fudge the facts about at least one aspect of their dating profile.

... dating expert and author of «The Perils of Cyber-Dating: Confessions of a Hopeful Romantic Looking for Love Online,» said that it would be helpful for sites to at least give users the option to do a background check on other...

Perhaps because of the authoring challenges, the Blu - ray did not resume unfinished playback, at least of the US theatrical cut.

Though at least one of the authors (Krueger) is a known skeptic of vouchers, they do not tip their hands here.

Third, as can be seen from the above paragraph, a good authoring tool package can «do it all» — or at least most of what you need.

The authors do not suggest that online learning is a «panacea» for the nation's education problems, but note that «well - designed interactive systems in higher education have the potential to achieve at least equivalent educational outcomes while opening up the possibility of freeing up resources that could be redeployed more productively.»

According to the authors of the Common Core, the most important implication of the study was this: what students can read, in terms of its complexity, is at least as important as what they can do with what they read.

The authors also looked at the dynamics of the principal labor market, and noted that, constrained by salary inertia and the absence of good performance measures, the market does not effectively weed out principals who are least successful in raising student achievement.

Romance doesn't have a lot of conventions, unlike SFF, (or at least it didn't — it's expanding too,) so it's not surprising Romantic Times got inundated, as romance has been at the forefront of e-books, self - pub romances, small press publication, shorter fiction publications (novellas & collections,) and author - reader interaction.

Now, however, with digital book formats and the ability to publish on your own through a couple dozen different outlets that all share revenues on about a 70:30 split with the author, maybe there's a lot more work to do as an author, but at least the system is set up to reward you the right way.

Recognizing that this could cause consternation when the royalty reports came out and the numbers didn't match, Amazon sent out an email explaining that for July, at least, all downloads through the KU program would result in payouts to their authors.

One of the best things we can do to find beta readers for our work (at least among our network of author friends) is to offer to beta read for others.

We authors tend to look for «social proof» to help us determine the right course of action, and it always seems, from the surface at least, that if we don't have our own personal army of followers then we're flops, failures, frauds... and other «F» words that shall go unmentioned.

Most indie authors know that, for all its problems, traditional publishing does offer certain benefits we don't have, or at least not easily, as indies.

Over the last two years since I jumped into the blogging game, I have seen at least half a dozen cases of well - known authors doing something equivalent to sticking their foot in it and pissing readers off either in small numbers or large.

> Map out your writing empire, including all the things you love to do > Start setting up and implementing the systems and structures you need to support your empire (including an author website, if you don't already have one) > Overhaul your writing life so you're aligned with and set up for the success you want to create > Get your nonfiction eBook written and published (at least one, but possibly more than one, if you're up for it) > Grow your following > Sell more books

Though I don't save names, at a guess I'd say at least half of this year's authors were first - time respondents.

Amazon Author Page: 4 out of 5 of these authors have pages Number of Reviews: each book has at least 186 reviews / 4.5 out of 5 star average Formats Available: 5 of these books are available in e-book, hardcover, paperback, audio download formats, 3 of them are available in mp3 CDs as well Publication date: These books were released between March 4 and September 23, 2014 Website: There doesn't appear to be a website for one of these authors.

Even if you don't deem us «professional authors» (although I've sold 50,000 copies of just one of my books, so...) at least we use professional standards in our writing, which is apparently more than can be said for your writing.

Indie authors expect to be able to do everything for free, or at least very cheaply — and it's true that they can, though paying someone often results in better quality work.

today's blog is about a less eternal but no less fascinating, at least for me, question, what does it mean to be an author at a time when the industry is undergoing such upheaval?