Sentences with phrase «at least they understand about»

Not exact matches

They can talk about neural pathways and neurotransmitters as if those big words definitively concluded anything, which they don't, at least with our current understanding of such things.

Fortunately, the type of annuity you're asking about — an immediate annuity — is (by annuity standards at least) the easiest to understand and, to my mind the type with the greatest potential for helping people who want more guaranteed lifetime income than Social Security alone will provide.

I've been able to accommodate faith and science, at least to a degree by Paul's words about our flawed human understanding and seeing through a glass darkly..

Anyway, maybe this material will help readers in expanding their context (or at least in understanding my opinion) on why the calling out of those who may be considered Commenders could help bring light and resolution to questions about Emergent Village system toxicity.

If there really were a god, why hasn't he inspired and guided sincere seekers to understand at least something about his nature?

That perhaps there is logic to at least be open to consider the possibility that us, life, nature, the universe, and everything may have come about through design in some sort of fashion or another and just because you may not understand it all doesn't necessarily mean that that there is no purpose behind it all.

If you understood the purpose of what Jesus preached about and I mean all of it, you might at least admire Jesus or him wanting do something right for humanity.

If you don't know about Islam, then learn about it to understand and be able to at least speak out of knowledge, not just opinion by association (that is to Christianity).

You do not understand everything the Christian church teaches, you say, and some things that you think you do understand you do not believe, but you at least see enough in the kind of faith and life for which Christianity stands so that you would like to do something about it.

Politics is about making prudential judgements, and an awareness that any such judgement has at least some chance of being wrong should add a bit of humility and understanding to political debate.

This much is obvious to any geometer, and it simply seems to me that Russell had the genius to recognize that, in like manner, propositions about other propositions had to be understood as of a logical order at least one «step» beyond that of the propositions they described.

Ok, let's forget about scientific explanations for a minute and turn to those people who REALLY know and understand the text of the Hebrew Bible - Orthodox Jews or, at the very least, Talmudic scholars.

If I understand his thesis correctly, it is very similar to what I have argued here — that the Old Testament must be interpreted in light of the New and that, at least occasionally, reports in the Old Testament (about what God commanded people to do) must be relativized in light of the character of God revealed in Jesus Christ who is the Word of God in person.»

When we study the history of Europe and America we can assume at least a minimal knowledge about the influence of Greek, Jewish, and Christian religious thought and practices, but for the study of the history of Asia we must prepare ourselves by gaining a sympathetic understanding of the quite different religious ideas and practices of that part of the world.

The more we can become clear about precisely where we disagree, the more we can at least understand each other.

It is not my intention to defend everything the encyclical tradition has had to say about sex and marriage but rather to point out that that tradition, especially in Arcanum Divinae, at least had the argument in the right ball park — namely, that what one says about sex is correlative to one's understanding of the nature of the family and what its function is for the preservation of good societies.

Disagreement about theology is one thing, but I take it that from your perspective, material truth is all that you can understand (for the time being, at least), and the notion of anyone claiming to believe (or better yet experience) other truths is abhorrent to you.

at least this guy knows what hes talking about, is constructive and understand the entire picture, unlike most of the articles published which are often opinated or one sided.

At the very least, this helps us understand more about how market - setting sportsbooks value injuries suffered by upper echelon NFL quarterbacks and is an example we can revisit when this scenario presents itself in the future.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

It is, perhaps, just about possible that Anelka could be good enough friends with somebody to want to dedicate a goal to them in their time of strife, yet not know him or his work in enough detail to understand that (a) even though he claims not to be anti-Semitic, that it is at least a subject of debate; that (b) despite his denials, much of his work looks to both the casual observer and the careful analyst to be flamingly and blatantly anti-Semitic; and (c) that this alleged / obvious and disputed / well - established anti-Semitism is the very basis of the strife in which said friends finds himself.

give me a break... Say all you want about the fight or if it did not excite you e.g. Nate tweeted about the fight claiming it did not excite him, I'd understand, although I enjoyed the fight personally I see where Nate would be coming from and at least Nate himself always puts on existing fights.

so its all about finding better attacking options do nt understand why he does nt put in big bids for reus or griezman... with sanchez and some combo of giroud walcott or ox that could offer all kind of options to creative midfield... or at least bring in drexler and push him further forward he has the right physique and skill set to be a dangerous attacking force... as it is is another 3rd or 4th place looks likeliest outcome

We will talk about what a blog is, why it's a useful marketing tool for your online shop and a few tips to make your blog more successful — or at least begin to understand why it is not already drawing in the readers in their 1000's!

There are all kinds of horrible truths about the risks to children and as much as I'd like to be blissfully unaware, as a responsible parent, I owe it to my child to understand all the dangers so that I can at least try to keep her safe.

I understand that breastfeeding is not always successful, but with all that science has told us about the benefits of breastfeeding, aren't your children worth at least an attempt?

They start talking or at least understanding words and communicate, they move around and they understand much more about the world than before.

At the very least, just having him say «yeah, I understand» or «I worry about that too» took that feeling of isolation away.

I took him to the doctor the other day and he said its totally normal that he will learn soon but it's really getting to me because I keep hearing from other moms that he should at least say a word or two by now and as a mom I feel really bad about it although he does understand me saying bye bye then he starts to put his hand up waving «bye bye».

I could almost understand a religious person saying that to your child about God (of course it would be terrible and totally wrong and you'd chuck a fit, but at least could see how it could made sense to them at the time).

Even if you don't use baby sign language and your baby doesn't use signs to communicate with you, you already know many things about your child, and you understand (at least some of those) nonverbal -LSB-...]

Please at least make an effort to educate yourself before bloviating to everyone about things you clearly do not understand.

Even if you don't use baby sign language and your baby doesn't use signs to communicate with you, you already know many things about your child, and you understand (at least some of those) nonverbal cues.

It's over now and at least I was able to get inspiration to write about it I understand about your baby being too small..

Moran concludes that one only need to watch the ascent of Donald Trump to understand that this Presidential contest (at least on the GOP side) is all about performance this year and not about substance.

Despite uncertainty about effectiveness, it can at least be said that Labour are using a strategy rooted in an understanding of the voters that can be justified with the survey evidence.

At the very least I can understand why a party that wins more often than not in Britain thinks twice about dumping a voting system that has delivered them so many decisive victories in the past.

Nevertheless, Cox and his colleagues press on, for the same reasons that researchers flocked to Guam in the 1950s: If BMAA exposure accounts for at least some of the most devastating neurological disorders, learning more about this obscure compound could have huge implications for understanding the underlying disease.

And Barr highlights, «It is important to know how to do things yourself, or at least understand how to do things,» which is why he advises learning «as much as you can from people who really know what they are talking about — that is usually not the person who talks the most in the coffee room.»

Although the amygdala's importance in face recognition and emotional assessment is well - known, little is understood about how these processes work, but research led by investigators at Cedars - Sinai and the California Institute of Technology has found that at least some of the brain cells that specialize in recognizing emotions may represent judgments based on the viewer's preconceptions rather than the true emotion being expressed.

Moreover, because virtually all of us share at least a few narcissistic traits, we may be able to learn something about ourselves from understanding them.

In any case there are ample resources on the internet for you to more fully understand this physics; there is at least one thread about the Antarctic here on RealClimate.

According to our current scientific understanding, at least most galaxies (including our Milky Way and those in Messier's catalog) have formed during a comparatively short period, at about the same time, within the first billion years after the universe started to expand, from an initial hot state.

To understand their proposal, we need to discuss a little - known fact (at least, I didn't know this) about our solar system's largest planet, Jupiter.

At least then I would have a clearer understanding about what's going on in my body and can start working to balance things out!

That is at least a little calming:) although the 60 grams of flax seed seem to be hole seeds that (at least as I understands it) passes pretty much right through the body it may not say so much about the risk of ground seeds?

I'm guessing from your post that you already understand about the importance of a whole plant food diet and have at least a sense of how to implement it.

I was so concerned that I asked Mike Eades about it on his blog and he said that was a common occurrence due to the body releasing cholesterol after the change in diet (at least that's the way I understood it.)

I wouldn't worry about form, speed, or races until at least a year of training and understanding your body.

He felt the Committee might be remiss if it did not at least comment about weight loss, including the fact that the mechanism for weight loss is not well understood.