Sentences with phrase «at oral argument in»

This issue was raised at oral argument in Trial Lawyers, and it is true that an expansive reading of that decision might be used to argue for the invalidity of such rules, since both their purpose and, surely, their effect, is to make some litigants forgo trials.

At oral argument in that court, they withdrew their objections to these rules, conceding

The answer to that question isn't obvious at all; indeed, it's the subject that the Supreme Court took up yesterday at oral argument in KSR International v. Teleflex and covered by Tony Mauro in this article, Justices Slam Nation's Patent System (Law.com, 11/29/06).

At oral argument in January, the justices were torn.

Justice Scalia explained this best at oral arguments in Friedrichs v. CTA.

Not exact matches

At Wednesday's oral arguments, the court's conservative majority appeared to have the votes to allow the public prayers to continue in some form, but both sides expressed concerns about the level of judicial and government oversight over prayers presented by members of a particular faith.

«This is a huge win for religious liberty,» said Douglas Laycock, a University of Virginia Law School professor who represented the church at the Supreme Court's oral arguments in October.

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

Next Monday, March 24 — the day before oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby andConestoga Wood Products cases — the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University's Berkley Center will host an event, «Everybody's Business: The Legal, Economic, and Political Implications of....

In his words, «Furthermore, since between 95 and 97 percent of the Jewish state was illiterate at the time of Jesus, it must be presumed that Jesus also was illiterate, that he knew, like the vast majority of his contemporaries in an oral culture, the foundational narratives, basic stories, and general expectations of his tradition but not the exact texts, precise citations, or intricate arguments of its scribal elites» (Ibid: 25 - 26In his words, «Furthermore, since between 95 and 97 percent of the Jewish state was illiterate at the time of Jesus, it must be presumed that Jesus also was illiterate, that he knew, like the vast majority of his contemporaries in an oral culture, the foundational narratives, basic stories, and general expectations of his tradition but not the exact texts, precise citations, or intricate arguments of its scribal elites» (Ibid: 25 - 26in an oral culture, the foundational narratives, basic stories, and general expectations of his tradition but not the exact texts, precise citations, or intricate arguments of its scribal elites» (Ibid: 25 - 26).

At this point we will look at the arguments based on (1) the empty tomb; (2) the absence of appearance narratives in Mark; (3) the testimony of Paul; and (4) the evidence of the oral traditionAt this point we will look at the arguments based on (1) the empty tomb; (2) the absence of appearance narratives in Mark; (3) the testimony of Paul; and (4) the evidence of the oral traditionat the arguments based on (1) the empty tomb; (2) the absence of appearance narratives in Mark; (3) the testimony of Paul; and (4) the evidence of the oral traditions.

At the 3:28 - minute mark in the video that appears below, Gillibrand expressed disappointment that today's oral arguments on challenges to the health care reform law — Day One of what will be a three - day marathon — are not widely viewable by the general public.

At 10:15 a.m., leaders from New York's organized labor movement will hold a news conference as the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, the latest in a series of attacks by the wealthy and corporate interests against ordinary working people, outside the Senate lounge, 3rd Floor, state Capitol, Albany.

Also at 1 p.m., the New York Civil Liberties Union presents oral arguments in the Albany County Supreme Court challenging the exclusion of farmworkers from the state labor law that protects employees who organize, Albany County Courthouse, 16 Eagle St., Albany.

Also at 9 a.m., parents and students from Middle Village Preparatory Charter School in Queens rally outside the Queens County Courthouse before oral arguments are heard in its case, 88 - 11 Sutphin Blvd., Queens.

Both agencies acted with official city and state misconduct, and in both cases, honest, credible evidence was repeatedly dismissed and ignored, and so was the corruption that remains to date — where knowingly false statements were made to discredit me (then later completely reversed during oral argument by my accusers), and both the DOI investigators (who appeared at my doorstep many times to collect evidence) and MTA Office of the Inspector General investigators invited me back to their headquarters (more than six times), from 1989 to 2008), and continued to take no action to restore and reinstate my city job, pension and social security contributions.

At 10 a.m., a Long Island man seeking exoneration after he pleaded guilty as an 18 - year - old in 1988 to sexually abusing boys and served 13 years in prison, Jesse Friedman, attends oral arguments in a state appeals court hearing seeking Nassau County DA and police files in the case; 45 Monroe Pl., Brooklyn.

At the end of the oral arguments, Fisher asked the plaintiffs to submit further written arguments concerning whether they have standing in the case, and on the «political question» — presumably, whether or not this is a matter to be decided by the courts or political system.

The Maine Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Nader v Democratic National Committee on September 14, at 2 p.m..

Oral arguments were held before Judge Eugene Devine this morning, with the attorney for the nine Senate Republicans involved involved in the suit arguing that a law requiring prisoners to be counted at their last - known address rather than where they are incarcerated is unconstitutional.

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a Rhode Island case that tests the constitutionality of prayers at public school graduation ceremonies.

Josh Dunn, an associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado - Colorado Springs, joins EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West to discuss the oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court on Monday, February 26, in Janus v. AFSCME.

Josh Dunn, an associate professor of political science at the University of Colorado - Colorado Springs, joins EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West to discuss the Supreme Court's oral arguments on Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.

Oral arguments in Schwartz v. Lopez, the Carson City case, begin at 10 a.m. at the Regional Justice Center, 200 Lewis Ave., in downtown Las Vegas.

Virginia Rutledge, counsel for The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (which filed a friend of the court brief in the case), told A.i.A., «The outcome can't be predicted based on questions raised during oral argument, but the Court has before it very compelling arguments for Prince's transformative use of Cariou's imagery and the significance of the First Amendment speech interests at stake, and was openly dismissive of allegations of market harm.»

Oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit begin at 9:00 am CST in the Warren E. Burger Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse at 316 North Robert Street in St. Paul and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.

Oral arguments begin at 10:00 am CST in the William L. Guy Federal Building, located at 220 East Rosser Avenue in Bismarck, North Dakota, and will immediately be followed by a press conference on the courthouse steps.

In the wake of a New York Times article pointing out that five years have elapsed since the last time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a high court oral argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance of this lengthy silencIn the wake of a New York Times article pointing out that five years have elapsed since the last time Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a high court oral argument, legal observers have been weighing in on the significance of this lengthy silencin on the significance of this lengthy silence.

LEAF and West Coast LEAF presented oral arguments in Rick v Brandsema at the Supreme Court of Canada on October 14, 2008.

More importantly, Reeve made an important step in skills training: he introduced formal moot courts as a part of the Litchfield curriculum, though on an optional basis.53 Initially, the students themselves conducted the moots, though by 1803, when James Gould was teaching at Litchfield, he presided over the arguments.54 The rules Gould imposed for the moots required not only oral argument, but also written argument, because the litigants had to produce writs and pleadings as well.55 Although a far cry from modern legal writing programs, these moot courts at least endeavored to provide some practical training in the production of persuasive writing.56

Second is today's oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which «concerns the torture of Ogoni leaders in Nigeria, but at stake is the future of the law under which this case was brought, the Alien Tort Statute.»

At 11 a.m. ET today, C - SPAN will stream the oral arguments in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, involving the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, requiring universities to allow military recruiters on campus or lose federal funds.

Access online the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., No. 05 - 1342: The transcript can be accessed at this link.

The weekly posts here offer an insider's perspective on oral arguments in major cases at the federal appellate level and news stories about sitting Supreme Court justices.

Other times, I can find oral arguments in the federal circuits or at SCOTUS, the audio files or transcripts, that tip where the appellate benches are going on issues.

The judge, Robert Castellani, had, at oral argument, expressed surprise that Reed would actually dispute the existence of such a right, according to an October article in the Fulton County Daily Report.

You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Abramski v. United States, No. 12 - 1493.

Update: You can access at this link the transcript of today's U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Paroline v. United States, No. 12 - 8561.

You'll see what's compelling at oral argument and in briefs, and you'll get a chance to peek behind the scenes and see how judges actually decide cases.

Shortly before oral arguments he went to New York City to prepare and stayed at the Ginsburgs» apartment, sleeping in one of the children's rooms.

He notes that at the oral argument of the case, one of the plaintiffs» lawyers proudly described himself as a «bounty hunter,» to which the court in its opinion remarked, «We will have more to say about exactly who Proposition 65 was created for later, but it wasn't bounty hunters.»

I had the strong impression at oral argument that the panel had not understood (or perhaps even read) the briefs we or the government had submitted, and was in any event not particularly interested in the real issues in the case.

At oral argument, counsel for Cuozzo argued that the PTAB should apply the Phillips claim construction analysis to IPR proceedings for several reasons: 1) BRI only applies when a claim under review may be freely amended; 2) Congress intended the IPR process to be «adjudicatory» rather than «examinational;» and 3) the two different standards would result in anomalies, including situations where claims mean «one thing for patentability in the Board, but a wholly different thing for infringement in the district courts.»

That is because a narrow escape tunnel was constructed at the suggestion of Elias LJ in oral argument at the Mitchell appeal.

It was Alito's first written opinion this term, Kimberly Atkins at DC Dicta notes, adding, «The decision was not entirely surprising, given the comments from the justices during oral arguments in the case.»

When longtime courtroom sketch artist William J. Hennessy Jr. showed up last week at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, supplies in hand, to capture oral arguments in a high - profile Guantanamo detainee case, the court's chief deputy clerk stopped him short.

Although none of the 2006 term's blockbuster opinions may emerge from the Court's very first oral argument session, it does appear that the 9th Circuit is well on its way to being reversed in at least three of the four cases to be argued in October.

I think one of the things that has come about for me in doing this over the last 10 or 15 years is that I really noticed and heard a lot of more experienced attorneys complaining to me that they think younger attorneys are less adept at oral arguments because they don't practice formulating their SOPs.

Ms. Wydler has developed an effective appellate practice for the firm through incisive brief writing and presenting oral arguments at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and district courts of appeal in Florida.

After all, if a Supreme Court advocate like Morrison, with twenty oral arguments under his belt and who played a substantial role in researching and drafting the District's 15,000 word brief due at the Court tomorrow is regarded as fungible, what hope is there for the rest of us?