Sentences with phrase «augustinian doctrine of original sin»

the negation of ideology, the political secularization of the doctrine of original sin, the cautious sentiment tempered by prudence, the product of organic, local human organization observing and reforming its customs, the distaste for a priori principle disassociated from historical experience, the partaking of the mysteries of free will, divine guidance, and human agency by existing in but not of the confusions of modern society, no framework of action, no tenet, no theory, and no article of faith, a distrust of the systems and processes of the idol of self and of the lust for power and status, scorn to all approaches of ideology and meta - narrative.

One of his major treatises, for example, was entitled The Doctrine of Original Sin, According to Scripture, Reason and Experience.

Similarly, the doctrine of Original Sin being passed on by physical generation, hence that we are all descended from the first humans who fell from grace, is indeed defined de Fide.

In this synthesis he diverged from Teilhard de Chardin and from any pantheism or confusion of the orders of matter and spirit, or denial of the doctrine of original sin.

In the Faith pamphlet «The Disaster of Sin», the existence of suffering and evil is confronted, and the doctrine of original sin outlined.

The immoral doctrine of original sin, where children are punished for the sins of their parents is hardly the scheme of a moral god.

Much as we may dislike the doctrine of original sin — and indeed it has often been formulated in a way that must antagonize any man of sense and good will — there would appear to be in human beings the seeds of selfishness, arrogance, brutality, callousness, the lust for power, jealousy, hatred and all the rest of the miserable host of evil.

Yorck gives by way of illustration a re-interpretation of the doctrines of original sin and the atonement.

Paul Tillich in his Systematic Theology would say that «The doctrine of original sin seems to imply a negative evaluation of man and this in radical contrast with the new feeling for life that has been developed in industrial society.»

Is it less «monstrous and repulsive» [as Dilthey had stigmatized the doctrine of original sin] that sickness and misery are inherited from generation to generation?

That is why Reinhold Niebuhr wondered how anyone could doubt the doctrine of original sin — it is, he said, the only Christian doctrine that is verifiable by observation.

On the other hand, there were other men who disagreed: Tertullian, who believed that the soul would live on forever, that the wicked would suffer misery in proportion to the righteous» reward; St. Augustine, who came up with the doctrines of Original Sin and Predestination (some would be saved, the rest would be damned); and Jerome, who would end up retranslating the Latin Bible into what would become the Latin Vulgate and would twist various scriptures that talked about eonian chastening into teaching eternal torment.

-- The Western Church — ALL of the Western Church — has inherited the doctrine of Original Sin.

I don't really know much about Niebuhr but was a bit puzzled about his quote about the empirically verifiable doctrine of original sin.

«The doctrine of original sin is the only empirically verifiable doctrine of the Christian faith.»

And it seems to me that is where postmodernism at its best gets us: it preaches the doctrine of original sin to arrogant modernism.

Calvinists and others add to the Bible when they interpret this verse to arrive at their doctrine of original sin.

Against all soft - centered optimism, Updike salutes the doctrine of original sin for acknowledging this obdurate fact: «The world is fallen, and in a fallen world animals, men, and nations make space for themselves through a willingness to fight.

Convinced of the truth of the doctrine of original sin, Eliot looked to theology for a solution to the human dilemma; he sought a salvation not through reform or education, but through grace.

The doctrine of original sin is not the teaching that human beings have problems (though all human beings do).

As Pagels shows, from the second century to even the early Augustine himself, there was no real precedent for Augustine's doctrine of original sin.

The cross of Christ was not meant to provide a means of forgiveness for a humanity that is universally condemned for the sins they could not avoid if they had wanted to (doctrine of Original Sin) but God gave his Son as a graphic and powerful demonstration that God forgives any and all, and invites everyone into the Kingdom of God wherein a person is given the Holy Spirit to help overcome and be free from sin.

He believed that his doctrine of original sin was but a commentary on Paul's thought, such as in Romans 1:24 - 25: «Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.»

(The only empirically verifiable doctrine of Christianity, he noted on more than one occasion, is the doctrine of original sin.)

Karma like the Christian doctrine of original sin seems to me not so much to explain the inequalities of life as to acknowledge them.

Modern man has rejected the traditional Christian doctrine of original sin.

Niebuhr, taking the doctrine of original sin seriously but not literally, believed that the biblical image of man conveyed a deeper understanding of the human situation than any alternate scheme.

Niebuhr took the traditional Protestant doctrine of original sin, stripped it of its literalism, and used it to explain the real character of modern society.

Hence he does not really enter into the whole investigation with which Christianity begins, into the prius [before] in which sin presupposes itself, and which is Christianly explained by the doctrine of original sin — a dogma to the border of which only we come in this investigation.

On the one hand, Niebuhr denied the orthodox tendency to convert the doctrine of original sin into a doctrine of a literally inherited corruption.

In his return to classical Christian anthropology, Niebuhr used the doctrine of original sin.

An Interpretation of Christian Ethics makes clear that man's tendency to claim more for himself than he ought to claim constitutes the Christian doctrine of original sin.

Niebuhr admitted that he had tried to purge the doctrine of original sin of some of its cruder traditional interpretations, but this effort proved vain for his modern readers.

His disenchantment with the Social Gospel finally began to emerge as a recovery of the doctrine of original sin, and his thought began to move in the direction of theological anthropology.

90 He said that he had changed his vocabulary but not his analysis, and remarked that he still thought that the London Literary Times Supplement was correct when it observed that the «doctrine of original sin is the only empirically verifiable doctrine of the Christian faith.»

The doctrine of original sin has been used for this purpose.

Without all the history and theology behind it, what the doctrine of original sin is basically saying is that because Adam and Eve were broke the rules, we all have the tendency to sin.

By contrast, Putnam's wavering threatened his claim that atheism represented a clear, indisputable rational truth; absent a doctrine of original sin, such weakness has to be expunged.

Augustine certainly assisted in creating a side road with his doctrine of original sin, as have many theologians, scholars and preachers of the past.

We must re-appropriate the doctrine of original sin in such a way that it speaks to our condition, and lends heuristic power to our personal and corporate forms of addressing evil.

Schleiermacher was the first theologian after Bayle to resuscitate the doctrine of original sin without reliance on the myth of Adam.

That error always appears in Christian theology when the doctrine of original sin is not very carefully stated.

This is implied above all in the doctrines of original sin and concupiscence.

For the present, my aim has been to explore new foundations for the old doctrine of original sin, allowing us once again to name its power.

Since Pierre Bayle launched his satirical attacks on Adam in his immensely popular Dictionnaire in the seventeenth century, the doctrine of original sin has never been the same.

Earlier, in The Structure of Christian Existence, he had also developed a system that can yet prove helpful in reconsidering the doctrine of original sin.

Even when the doctrine of original sin has been purged of literalistic errors, Niebuhr's approach has been rejected by the Pelagian temper that the free will can attain righteousness.

Unlike West, she relates her insights to the old doctrine of original sin, stating that «feminism can rediscover the meaning of the fall in a radically new way» (SGT 37).

This is necessary because of the human situation, already described by Niebuhr in terms of the doctrine of original sin.16

Schleiermacher's major influence in the nineteenth century was in areas other than this unique development of the doctrine of original sin and its transmission.