Sentences with phrase «australian federal court decision»

In December 2016 an Australian Federal Court decision decided Woolworths» Mind the Gap program was not unconscionable.

Not exact matches

The public benefit test was recently considered, albeit not in a media merger context, by the Full Federal Court in ACCC v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 (Tabcorp) where the Court applied a broad concept of public benefit consistent with the Fairfax decision in New Zealand:

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said it will not appeal the Federal Court decision which dismissed its claim that Woolworths had engaged in unconscionable conduct through its «Mind the Gap» scheme.

The Full Federal Court (comprising Justice Besanko, Justice Perram and Justice Robertson) handed down its judgment on the appeals by ACCC and Crownbet against the decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal in relation to the Tatts / Tabcorp merger authorisation.

The ACCC has applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal's recent Tabcorp / Tatts merger authorisation decision.

The Federal Court Registry lists the ACCC and Crownbet appeals against the decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal for judgment at 2:15 pm today.

The ACCC today filed a Notice of Appeal from the Federal Court's decision dismissing the ACCC's proceedings against the Australian Egg Corporation Ltd and others, which commenced in May 2014.

The Full Federal Court today handed down its decision in relation to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's appeal against the judgment in ACCC v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd..

«The Federal Court's decision reinforces that foreign based businesses selling goods and / or services to Australian consumers can be subject to Australian Consumer Law obligations, including the consumer guarantees,» said ACCC Chairman, Rod Sim.

Michael Kennedy, HSI / Australia director, said: «If the Japanese Government sanctions whaling in Antarctic waters by Kyodo again this year, as we fear it will, and Kyodo continues to ignore the 2008 injunction and the decision of the Federal Court, it is critical that the Australian Government raises this issue with the Japanese Government in the most forceful way possible.»

The ACCC has applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal's recent Tabcorp / Tatts merger authorisation decision.

The Federal Court yesterday upheld the ACCC's application for Judicial Review, setting aside the decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal on 22 June 2017 to authorise the proposed merger between Tabcorp at Tatts.