Not exact matches
In 1989, at a meeting of ministers of education, the
Australian Educational Council ratified an historic
agreement to develop a
framework for a national curriculum in eight areas of learning.
Australia is in a unique situation, compared to many other countries, with its previous joint
agreements that provide excellent
frameworks for the betterment of education for all
Australians.
The Western
Australian Aboriginal Native Title Working Group (WAANTWG) has proposed that Indigenous parties provide a negotiation report rather than a connection report to clarify issues among relevant Indigenous groups in relation to what interests should be addressed in
framework agreements and resulting negotiations.
That the
Australian Government, through COAG, develop a remote education strategy and accountability
framework to be embedded in the National Indigenous Reform
Agreement and in the relevant National Partnership
Agreements.
The South
Australian Government, Farmers Federation and Chamber of Commerce are working with native title groups and the representative body, Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, to establish a state - wide
framework agreement in which an enormous range of issues, including, native title determinations, access
agreements, service provision, public health, heritage protection, intellectual property rights, water management, environmental management infrastructure, heritage clearance and notification procedures are on the table.
Under this
framework agreement, the
Australian Government also provided funding for the establishment of a new community housing organisation called Central
Australian Affordable Housing Company (CAAHC).
In its submission in response to the
Agreements Discussion Paper, the
Australian Human Rights Commission recommended that the Native Title Act should be amended to include explicit criteria as to what constitutes good faith, and be supplemented by a code or
framework to guide parties and the NNTT as to the requirements of good faith negotiation.
This has been through the processes of the Council of
Australian Governments (COAG) that has made a number of commitments to address Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage as well as through the
agreement of a specific health sector
framework for addressing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health issues.
It must be recognised, however, that the COAG Principles for government service delivery to Indigenous
Australians already require governments to work together to better coordinate their service delivery and so, strictly speaking, the alignment of health service delivery with the new arrangements is not dependent on the re-negotiation of the
framework agreements.
The South
Australian Government developed a State - wide
framework for negotiations, the South
Australian Indigenous Land Use
Agreement (ILUA) State - wide Negotiations to South
Australian Native Title Resolution.
The working group will consider how to build clearer links between the OID
framework, the National
Framework of Principles for Delivering Services to Indigenous
Australians, the COAG Reconciliation
Framework and the bilateral
agreements between the Commonwealth and State and Territory Governments.
the social inclusion performance
framework developed by the COAG Health and Ageing Working Group and the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission in relation to the
Australian Health Care
Agreements; and