So if, for example, somebody comes up with a new method that seems to wipe out a lot of
details of contemperaneously - recorded history, uses non-standard
statistical methods and refuses to release the data on which it is based, I do not immediately claim the
author to be the greatest scientist since Newton and grab his work to my (metaphorical) bosom with little squeals of girlish delight.
In support of CanLII's upcoming hackathon, the study
author Thom Neale has developed an interactive website that will show all the fun
statistical details about these cases (including style of cause) as well as cool graphs that show their influence over time and in comparison to other or groups of other cases.