Sentences with phrase «authors of this review suggest»

Authors of this review suggest it's unsafe to consume more than 2.5 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight — more than 1.14 grams per pound of body weight — daily.

The authors of the review suggested that cirrhosis can affect function in the area of the brain that regulates our circadian rhythm and this explains the sleep disruption associated with liver disease.

Authors of this review suggest a maximum safe daily intake of protein is 2.5 grams per kilogram of body weight, or about 1.14 gram of protein per pound of body weight each day.

Not exact matches

Research also suggests that women who use hospital - based birthing centers are more likely to have a normal vaginal birth and more likely to be breast - feeding six to eight weeks after delivery than those who give birth in a typical hospital setting, said Ellen Hodnett, a professor of nursing at the University of Toronto and a review author for the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.

«This suggests the presence of children contributes meaningfully to the gender wage gap,» the authors write in the May issue of American Economic Review, though they also note that «[t] hese results should be interpreted with caution» because of various complicating factors.

Wager's team compared editor - chosen and author - suggested reviews submitted to 40 of BioMed Central's journals.

In at least one case, the authors of a retracted article claim they didn't use an agency and did not propose fake reviewers — which suggests the journal's editors invited the fake review instead.

The Review's lead author, Professor Theresa Marteau, Director of the Behaviour and Health Research Unit at the University of Cambridge, UK, says: «This evidence suggests that using nutritional labelling could help reduce calorie intake and make a useful impact as part of a wider set of measures aimed at tackling obesity,» She added, «There is no «magic bullet» to solve the obesity problem, so while calorie labelling may help, other measures to reduce calorie intake are also needed.»

«The new guidelines suggest that journals include in their information for authors their policies for statistical analysis and how they review the statistical accuracy of work under consideration.

The authors suggest the NFL and other sports leagues should review the procedures for stem cell treatment to determine how best to support, evaluate and possibly regulate stem cell treatments to ensure the safety of their players and their followers.

Lee and Moher suggest that large experimental studies are needed to judge the effectiveness of different web - based peer review templates to enforce reporting standards, and of ways one might train authors, reviewers and editors to use such tools and evaluate research.

The authors of a new study reviewing the volume data, detailed on Monday in the journal Nature Geoscience, are quick to caution, though, that one single year of rebound doesn't suggest any sea ice recovery, as the overall trend is still downward.

Aim to complete more than 250 minutes of aerobic exercise weekly — equivalent to more than 50 minutes, five days weekly — for effective weight loss, suggest authors of a review published in 2009 in «Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.»

Safely eat up to 2.5 grams of protein per kilogram of your body weight daily, suggest authors of a review published in 2009 in «Nutrition and Metabolism.»

While the authors of this narrative review cite one trial suggesting that a low - carb diet may even do better than a Mediterranean Diet, it is important to note that people on the low - carb diet «were counseled to choose vegetarian sources of fat and protein».

However, the authors of the review state that this data was not reported well enough to be taken in total confidence even though the findings do suggest «several potential benefits» for students.

The authors suggest that the literacy coach begin by connecting a new initiative to current practice to validate teachers» prior efforts, choose generative practices that raise important questions about teaching, establish teaching credentials by spending significant amounts of time teaching in the classroom, focus teacher training on student learning, use a repertoire of coaching strategies, and get into the habit of regularly videotaping and reviewing lessons and demonstrations.

Upon the publication of Jonathan Franzen's Freedom, BookPage reader favorite Jennifer Weiner suggested that the New York Times reviews male authors more often than female authors (and takes them more seriously, overall).

When my newest book came out last January, THE TRUTH (I'm Smart, I'm a Girl and I Know Everything), The Cadence Group suggested that I have a profile page and do reviews of other authors.

You're not the first author I've heard about who found errors in royalty statements and the agent Kristin Nelson has spoken often in the past about how she reviews all the statements that come into her office and finds a surprising number of errors (and suggests there are likely many authors out there who are losing money because they're not taking a close enough look at their statements).

Once the author reviews the edited manuscript and makes suggested changes / adjustments, another edit of the entire manuscript will be completed by a second editor on staff.

Honestly, Amazon's services with respect to authors are actually pretty poor: You're limited in sales, there's no way to send out review copies short of making an unofficial one yourself or, as Amazon suggests, making the book free for a day and urging the reviewer to download it during that period.

After the final meeting, I recommend author's review their writing through the eyes of a reader to understand why the edits were suggested.

The study follows ongoing concern in the UK that women authors struggle to get the same review and media coverage, as well as prize shortlistings and winnings, which prompted writer Kamila Shamsie to suggest a Year of Publishing Women in 2018.

You might launch the program by suggesting a list of authors of recent books they've purchased or reviewed.

And in «The Laws of the Amazon Jungle,» I suggested some steps authors can to take to stay safe from the Amazon review trolls and Goodreads bullies.

Are you suggesting that someone on a blog who has published peer - reviewed work that disagrees with the authors of the other papers, somehow has some right to expect a response, or to be listened to?

The purpose of allowing an author to suggest reviewers to a Journal is so that the Journal may more easily find people knowledgeable in the field to critically review the paper.

And in response, NASA's chief scientist politely suggested that the letter's authors and signers should publish any contrary hypotheses and data in peer - reviewed scientific journals instead of trying to censor the publication of scientific conclusions from NASA climate scientists.

From Civil Eats: «Maricel Maffini [author of a 2013 study on data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in U.S. foods] suggests the FDA's current system of approving food additives could be improved by requiring additive safety to be reviewed periodically and by basing safety information on how much people actually eat.»

I suggested that I would be most appreciative of reviews from some of the authors that I referenced in the bibliography.

It appears mostly sensible and has a lot of useful things to say about improving IPCC processes â $ «from suggesting a new Executive to be able to speak for IPCC in - between reports, a new communications strategy, better consistency among working groups and ideas for how to reduce the burden on lead authors in responding to rapidly increasing review comments.

It appears mostly sensible and has a lot of useful things to say about improving IPCC processes — from suggesting a new Executive to be able to speak for IPCC in - between reports, a new communications strategy, better consistency among working groups and ideas for how to reduce the burden on lead authors in responding to rapidly increasing review comments.

The authors suggest that even firms that opt for the status quo will require a review of their talent strategy.

But this letter was sent for a positive review which linked to the site, and did not originate from a questionable domain, which seems to suggest to me that the authors of the letter did not fully understand the implications of Penguin (or was an unintended recipient of a mass e-mail).

First: May I suggest that the author shows a lack of understanding of the role and function of the Senate, which is to provide intelligent, informed and impartial review of the actions of the elected Parliamentarians in the House of Commons.

However, for both child abuse and parent stress, the average effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack of evidence for effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack of sizable effects in preventing child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity of surveillance of families in the treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing on the quality of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall effect of home - visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing maltreatment and childhood injuries.

While existing reviews report positive outcomes for cognitive - behavioral therapy, behaviour management, and parenting interventions, either alone or in combination with family - based approaches, the authors suggest that evidence for interventions with a child - only component was limited because of the small number of studies and that the estimate for child - only interventions was imprecise.