Sentences with phrase «bigger mean then»

Not exact matches

Best of all, these sorts of innovations can be patented and then licensed to major corporations, which means potentially big bucks to the inventors for a very long time.

These batteries then in turn take up more space, weigh the car down and demand even more power, which means the battery needs to be bigger, and so on.

«If equivalence plays a much bigger role than it plays today then we need enhanced equivalence, that means putting on the table how does this equivalence work,» he told Reuters during a visit to London.

In recent history missing the big game meant having to wait until then following morning when you could read about the results in the newspaper, or hear them from your friends.

Barbara grew up in a big family, meager means, made to believe she was deficient according to the standards of a grossly outdated education system, betrayed by a boyfriend and then went on to become a BOSS in real estate.

Value per user If a bigger audience means greater opportunity for growth and monetization, then in theory, Facebook's (NASDAQ: FB) user base should be worth more than either Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google + or Twitter.

«That means if you had the card in the last 24 months, then cancelled it, you probably won't get that big point boost again.»

And at the same time, I mean, fundamentally, it's so easy to buy the big easy late in a bull market that a lot of people don't wan na do it, so then they underperform.

If you have a big site that has a lot of different product categories and you need to develop some sort of value proposition, when I say value proposition, I mean you know a headline, some context in terms of additional copy and then an image.

Actually few months before what is happening now in my country I saw big flood flooding over the city but not in to my place of my living... although people were some screaming and some as riding it smiling but all were being washed away... then have asked a freind about it who said it might mean no much money or business will be coming to me which I doubted if it meant that, but today I know what it was about...!

To the religinuts: If by god, you mean the force behind the big bang then most atheist believe in god and we can have a discussion... if you mean that you join dead jesus» fan club and follow his club rules, (which were written by... strangers) you go to disney land in the sky forever....

If the events were meant to happen, Judas would then be the biggest martyr.

I mean if your issue is paying for things you do not use then your issue is much bigger than just contraceptives and I hope you are speaking out against the rest of it as well.

If it means anything (and probably won't to anyone) after reading all the comments I dreamed Shiva was in a big muddy river with no skin on his body and the snake around his neck split into two heads and one bit me... and then I woke up sick.»

That means knowing the big story, knowing the people's stories and their capacities, and then serving them with care.

For when in summer the peasant's horse stands in the meadow and throws up his head or shakes it, surely no one can know with certainty what that means; or when two of them who throughout their lives have walked side by side pulling in the same yoke are turned out at night, when they approach one another as if in intimacy, when they almost caress each other by movements of the head; or when the free horses neigh to one another so that the woods echo, when they are gathered on the plains in a big herd as if at a public meeting — assume then that they really could make themselves understood to one another.

First the earth doesn't rotate around the sun, then evolution is a farce and dinosaurs fossils are tricks placed by the devil to tempt people into not believing, and now the big bang is more proof that when the bible said the world was 6000 years old... it meant 18 billion years old.

Unless, by «heaven,» you mean a 10oz filet (medium, of course) with a side of mashed sweet potatoes and a big glass of pinot noir... then, count me in.

So now since no religion accepts these acts which are forbidden by God as a one of the biggest sins then would that mean establishing them a new party, religion or would be joined as to under the umbrella of Druids?!

Anyhow rather take this short journey to death thinking I know the big man than to die and be nothing but dust (my spirit not the body, it will be dust) It gives life meaning if you die and you become nothing then it don't matter anyway.

If Christians believe that the church and the worship it offers to God ought in some ways to counter the norms and practices of the surrounding culture, then what does it mean that after spending so much of our time each week in front of computer monitors, cell phones, and sports bar TVs, we come to church on Sunday and happily position ourselves in front of the biggest screen of all?

That doesn't mean I think I'm better than you - it means truth is absolute and not subjective - and wish you all believed that and I'd love to help you with that and then baptize all of you (with a big smile).»

Which also means, if the universe began with the big bang, then time came into existence, and then he also existed before and transcends time.

Then we turned around and saw it was a big, mean world out there, and we didn't belong in it anymore.

If religion is the only thing that gives your life meaning then you are missing out big time.

Many churches talk about vision casting, and this generally means envisioning how big and influential the church can be in ten or twenty years, and then deciding what steps need to be taken to get there.

Sometimes the little shortcuts make a big difference in a busy day though, so if this helps, then by all means do so.

When you say line a springform with parchment, do you just mean to cover the bottom, then assemble the springform and leave edges sticking out all around the bottom, or do you put a big piece over the top once the springform is put together and then push it down into the bottom, with edges sticking out around the top, or cutting two pieces of parchment to line the bottom (with a circle) and sides (with a strip) perfectly?

This means that I boil the broccoli for one or two minutes and then plunge it into a big bowl full of ice water.

Then add the cooled quinoa and process until you have a mixture that looks like ground «meat», meaning there should not be big lumps of nuts or mushrooms.

It is a disgrace when you are able to be complete and always you come short, it grows frustration among fans, pundits, and everyone who bet on you... Other so called big teams manged to fulfill their expectations and potential, I mean city, chelsea and man city, and that's why the media stands by their sides, however, our management either has ego or ignorance so much that they decline everyone call to stand as a big club and fix their flaws... Now the pundits and the media wait for us to slip and then say «see we told you»...

well if u lose to PSG, u finish runner - up which means u have a very good chance to face a UCL big boy like say Barca fr xample n then we have a very good chance of getting knocked outta the R16 AGAIN!!

it seems wenger does nt have the courage to play big... he does nt take risks... then he says he was looking at the player of the moment, or he said the same speech u already gave to us to defend something that is, for me, only stubborness and lack of diligence... about granit: do nt start with formal arguments, go to the bone, u know what i mean... u cant said xhaka was the good choise while we did nt see hin play for our colours... i hope he could be the player that we need, but nobody can said that today

If we do, then it just means we have one less of the big boss to play.

when well» beckperez, then we can have a bigger 4ward line for rotation.that would mean AW can rest any of our front men without distracting our play style.miss our 90 + min match winner DW23.!

We spent big the following year, multiple buys meant we spent over double what we spent the year before on Ozil... Maybe this had a knock on effect because the following year we only got Cech in the main transfer window and then the unknown but brilliant Elneny in the winter window.

Arsenal have to secure the attack and get Alexis ready for the match against Barca and the remaining fixtures against top premier league sides.The team has to win against Barca and then beat them at Nou - Camp causes it really is irritating to see Wenger playing bad players in the big matches in the past, Arsenal have allowed themselves to be weak where Wenger is after the league means these Southhampton, Stoke, Chelsea get the luck against this side.

Overseeded South Carolina vs. Marquette might be the biggest dud game of the first round, which means Duke walks to the second weekend and then takes care of Shake Milton and company to set up the regional final we all want to see.

but we know talent wins in the league more than anything else, and if you have someone guys like, someone guys will play hard for, someone who guys want around because they know it'll mean good things for their career, then that's a big part of getting to a good place

If we play 3 -4-2-1 again then we need a strong presence who can hold the ball up which in the PL usually means a bigger physique (but not always).

He will then say we need to secure qualification (through play offs) before we can attract big players, which will then mean end of august or last two weeks of August.

If United retain the big shiny silver one, then the result will go down in history either as a blip or as «the moment that galvanised Ferguson's men / meant Jonny Evans was finally, mercifully, put out to pasture / saw Phil Jones take the armband».

If Arsenal making big signings mean some players will get benched and have their careers killed then so be it!

There are rumours going around about a possible big money move to China for the striker and also about a dispute over his fitness, which could mean that Costa has already made up his mind to accept the massive salary and head east and if that is true then Graeme Souness reckons it could spell the end of their title challenge, as a Sky Sports report explains.

Podolski was great for arsenal during his glory days and like «sylvain wiltord» said, he did a pretty decent job to help arsenal maintain the top 4 status back then but its obvious AFC has bigger aspirations now which means the big guns of football is what we need right now... but what baffles me is the fact that only a Turkish club is interested in him... really f * #ked up!

wenger and mourinho made me believe the saying once beaten, twice shy... by no means is it a coincidence that wenger has never beaten mourinho in over 13matches... This is not even laughable, its total domination... You are probably the guys who yap all transfer period of how we have great squad and then shit on your pants on big games math days

Chambers is still too raw, I don't know why Hayden and Ajayi have not been given a chance, but I figure it means they are not trusted enough, and then there would be the point in wanting to maintain stability by not bringing in a big ego but I am sure there are many defenders that are the same level or nearly the same as, or best but not too big as to want to call the shots.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Ask yourself why Ferguson was happy to allow the likes of David Beckham, Ruud Van Nistelrooy, Jaap Stam and Cristiano Ronaldo to leave the club, when seemingly their intentions to do so were not motivated by greed, yet a young upstart tells the club «I want an obscene wage like the players at Man City, if you don't give it to me then I am off» and for some reason rather than choosing to cash in on a player who appears to not know the meaning of the word «loyalty» (just ask Everton supporters), instead hands the player the biggest deal in the club's rich history.