Not exact matches
The
BOJ currently makes the distinction because
buying long - term government
bonds for monetary easing could bind its hands on policy for longer than it wants and make a future exit from ultra-loose easing difficult.
His comment followed Abe's remarks on Monday that
buying foreign
bonds, considered an extreme measure by many officials, may be one policy option for the
BOJ.
Under its current asset -
buying and lending tool, the
BOJ limits the duration of government
bonds it
buys to three years because it wants to push down the cost of borrowing for companies, many of whom work in three - year investment cycles.
Many
bonds trade at negative yields because the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of Japan (
BOJ) continue to
buy bonds as part of their management of monetary policy.
Reuters reported that the
BoJ, as it is colloquially known, is considering making negative interest rates a continued centerpiece of monetary policy, where
bond buying has just not been enough to stimulate the economy.
The big negative incentive, of course, is that if the
BOJ wastes its firepower by easing when things are generally going in an inflationary direction is that ultimately it will have to disappoint by running out of
bonds to
buy once GPIF and Japan Post have sufficiently reduced holdings.
Nonetheless, the
BOJ can not keep
buying 80 trillion yen ($ 775 billion) a year of government
bonds indefinitely.
The intervention should not work, and what will the
BoJ do with all the new Dollar
bonds that they
bought?
The asset -
buying program of the Bank of Japan (
BOJ) has been so substantial it has left interest rates squarely in negative territory and has created a problematic shortage of JGBs in the marketplace, as the
BOJ actively competes with large institutions for existing
bonds (Kawa, 2016).