2017 [Collective] BASH, Farnsworth
Art Museum at 449 Main St., Rockland, Maine 2016 Belfast Poetry Festival, Barbara Kramer Gallery, Belfast, Maine From A to
B (solo exhibition), Perimeter Gallery, Belfast, Maine Cranbrook + / -25 years (traveling group exhibition)- 2016 NCECA 50th Annual Conference, Kansas City, Missouri - University
Art Gallery, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico - Ceramic Research and Brickyard Gallery, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Winter Windows, fourTWELVE, Rockland, Maine 2015 Panels, Perimeter Gallery, Belfast, Maine 2014 Vessels, The Qube, Detroit, Michigan Small Favors IX, The Clay Studio, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2014 Graduate
Degree Exhibition, Cranbrook
Art Museum, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 2013 The Balance, Forum Gallery, Cranbrook Academy of
Art, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
Art Y ’ All, Nasher Sculpture Center, Dallas, Texas A New Interior, Forum Gallery, Cranbrook Academy of
Art, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan Experiencing Perspectives 2013 - 14, Mercedes Benz Financial Services, Farmington Hills, Michigan CERAMICA: Contemporary Clay, Galleries of Contemporary
Art, UCCS, Colorado Springs, Colorado 2011 1:1, Ice Cube Gallery, Denver, Colorado HIVE, Galleries of Contemporary
Art, UCCS, Colorado Springs, Colorado 2010 2010 Visions
In Clay, National Juried Exhibition, LH Horton Jr..
Walker graduated from the High School of Music &
Art, after which he received his BS in art education and MA degree in drawing and painting from Wayne State University in Detro
Art, after which he received his
BS in art education and MA degree in drawing and painting from Wayne State University in Detro
art education and MA
degree in drawing and painting from Wayne State University
in Detroit.
The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled
in the
art»; (
b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim
in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as forming part of the «state of the
art» and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed; (4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled
in the
art or do they require any
degree of invention?