When
babies die because of the philosophy of normal birth, they have two choices to reduce cognitive dissonance.
When
babies die because of aggressive breastfeeding promotion, they have two choices.
The problem is that the lay midwives who generally attend OOH births tend to object to such analysis (using such slogans as «
babies die in hospitals, too») and, in fact, to any regulations whatsoever.
That last point is important because a shocking 3,700
babies die in their sleep every year.
Babies die in hospitals as well, and for me I believe the risks are worse there for a healthy woman with ahealthy pregnancy.
The posters that say «
babies die at home,
babies die in the hospital» show a remarkable lack of emotional connection for the dead babies and their grieving mothers and fathers etc..
People die,
babies die — in all kinds of situations.
And about 1,200 more
babies die each year during sleep for reasons that are unknown.
Yes, «some»
babies die, but those are born prematurely or born to women who would never have been candidates for homebirth.
If all else fails, just declare that «
babies die.»
This also ignores the fact that MORE
babies die at home than in the hospital.
It's true that
babies die in the hospital too.
Babies die in the hospital and they die at home.
Both her mother and her daughter had
babies die.
I wonder how many women have been supported and encouraged by homebirth websites to risk their babies» lives at homebirth and then have
those babies die.
fed
babies die, then I blame the milk in formula.
Yes,
some babies die in the hospital, but those babies are almost always premature or have congenital anomalies incompatible with life.
So you think the kind thing would be for us to sit back and let more and more
babies die because women get encouraged by idiots on the internet to do foolish things.
The issue is not whether
some babies die in hospitals, but whether babies die of preventable causes in the hospital.
Anybody can lower his C - section rate if he is he content to let
babies die.
What Dr. Klein is actually saying is this: it's worth letting
babies die in order to lower the C - section rate.
Some babies die in the hospital, right?
Ignoring your insane, made - up statistics, your argument is that because
babies die in hospitals and elsewhere by other means that we should all accept home birth deaths as well and refrain from discussing how to prevent them?
In the wake of the Karen Carr homebirth debacle, homebirth advocates have trotted out a classic homebirth lie: «
Babies die in the hospital, too.»
So, yes,
babies die in hospital too — but they die at a much higher rate at home.
And yet, in a lot of the stories where
babies die, the mom talks about watching the midwife do CPR on the bed.
Also I can't prove statistically that 68 % of
babies die but that number sounds terribly high.
many more
babies die in cribs than parents» beds.
«
Babies die in hospitals, too.»
I wonder why he didn't just say» Homebirth attended by a CPM is safe or safer than hospital birth if you don't count the fact that 3 times as many
babies die»?
Babies die all the time at homebirth, and the biggest risk factors lead to the greatest number of deaths.
And the numbers nation wide show that
babies die in homebirth three times more often.
Arguing that
babies die in hospitals does not excuse homebirth midwives or advocates.
Yes,
babies die in the hospital, but they die at rates 3 - 10 times higher at homebirth because HOMEBIRTH INJURES AND KILLS BABIES.
I will now translate «but
babies die in hospitals too» as «So I effed up.
Yes, women and
babies die in both locations, just like people die in car crashes and in plane crashes.
I think clowns like Gaskin who award themselves the title of midwife and let
babies die preventable deaths are the lowest form of evil.
I think no matter how many
babies die or how they die, it's too many, but let» t not pretend that midwives are the only ones who make mistakes.
We have had several home birth
babies die in our community over the past year, and looking at the medical records it seems very unlikely that any of them would have died had they been born in a hospital.
I would have thought she'd go with the more tried and true «
babies die in hospital too» especially as she could have tried to claim that most of the Oregon babies died in hospital and that it was therefore unfair to blame intended OOH for their demise Shows home birth advocates are getting desperate if they are willing to slice and dice the data in completely nonsensical ways to still try and make their point that OOH birth is safe.
No, I am a hater of letting
babies die preventable deaths for no better reason than bragging rights.
What hardly ever gets pointed out, in the «
babies die in hospitals» [faux] argument is that, while, yes, babies do die in hospitals, it is after everything possible has been done to save them, whereas in homebirth babies are put at the utmost risk of death by not having proper staff / equipment / conditions, etc. to save them.
Babies die in the hospital because they have congenital defects or because they are born prematurely.
Every year more than 5,500
babies die from it in the US.
I have counseled women who have had
their babies die for many years.
Even in 2015 women all over the world in 3rd world counties DIE in birth and
their babies DIE too.
Though rare, over 2000
babies die from SIDS each year in the United States.
3) how many mothers /
babies die of hospital acquired MRSA?
Yes and
babies die in the hospital, too.
The problem is that a much higher percentage of
babies die at homebirth.