Not exact matches
Create a mood ideal for showcasing your home such
as playing relaxing
background music, lighting a fire, adding plants and flowers, maximizing lighting and fine - tuning the
temperature
Fritz Zwicky used it for the first time to declare the observed phenomena consistent with dark matter observations
as the rotational speeds of galaxies and orbital velocities of galaxies in clusters, gravitational lensing of
background objects by galaxy clusters such
as the Bullet cluster, and the
temperature distribution of hot gas in galaxies and clusters of galaxies.
The universe's age can be gleaned from the sizes of
temperature ripples in the cosmic microwave
background, such
as these from the DASI telescope.
Working with a tough mentor named Yakov Zel «dovich, Sunyaev showed that the tiny acoustic vibrations in the universe moments after the Big Bang could be observed
as temperature and density variations in the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) radiation, the faint afterglow of the Big Bang that suffuses the universe.
In addition to measuring the
temperature of the cosmic microwave
background, Planck can determine its polarization, the direction in which the waves of light vibrate
as they move through space.
The point at which a trend becomes clear within the average
temperature data for a given region — known
as the «time of emergence» — depends on when the source of the warming begins, how fast it happens and the amount of
background «noise» obscuring the signal.
After scientists have done the hard work of working out these relations, it is possible to use one ice - core record to represent broader regions IF you restrict consideration to the parts that are widely coherent, so it is O.K. to plot a smoothed version of an Antarctic
temperature record against CO2 over long times and discuss the relation
as if it is global, but a lot of
background is required.
point triumphantly to the cosmic microwave
background temperature of the last century and declarethat warming impossible on the grounds that it's only 4.6 Kelvin in all directions
as far
as you can look.
Here's the
background: «
As far as the NOAA issue goes, the use of a baseline to calculate temperature anomalies relates to the issue of what is meant by «anomaly»
As far
as the NOAA issue goes, the use of a baseline to calculate temperature anomalies relates to the issue of what is meant by «anomaly»
as the NOAA issue goes, the use of a baseline to calculate
temperature anomalies relates to the issue of what is meant by «anomaly».
Elsewhere, the
background forecast model plays a stronger role, helping values of surface air
temperature to be derived from other types of observation, such
as sea - surface
temperatures and winds.
The atmospheric Greenhouse Effect merely sets a theoretical
background atmospheric
temperature level that is continually overridden
as a result of the size of the constant interlinked changes in both the solar and oceanic heat inputs.
Furthermore natural global
temperature swings alter the natural
background greenhouse effect constantly
as water vapour held in the atmosphere increases and decreases naturally with changing global
temperatures.
Hansen» rationalization of why, (
as he states) «the five - year mean global
temperature has been flat for the last decade», is interesting
background information, but, of course, does not change the observed fact that there is this standstill, which he acknowledges.
lolwot — people with an agricultural
background point out that northern latitude areas that can not grow certain
temperature sensitive crops today, whereas in past years, such
as the MWP, the same crops could be grown in those areas disprove Mann's hockey stick
temperature reconstruction.
In fact,
as noted above, Bradley is cited not once and not in «another section», but six times all in section 2.1 «
Background on Paleoclimate
Temperature Reconstruction»,
as well
as in the bibliography.
I would probably generally state it
as «human CO2 activity has a measurable warming impact on global average
temperature that can be readily discerned from the
background of natural climate change and other human effects that may cause cooling, and this warming impact will be, in general, neutral in impact for humanity and the biosphere».
«An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol
background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface
temperature by
as much
as 3.5 ° K.»
Although the sunspot effect may very well be minimal over 100 years or so the cumulative effect over 500 years does seem capable of providing a
background temperature trend that eventually does rank significantly
as compared to ENSO on its own.
b Trends surface
temperature from the GOGA CAM3 simulations (
background colorscale; air
temperature over sea ice and SST elsewhere) along with the Z850 trend produced by the model simulations (black contours; negative dashed and positive solid; interval of 3 m / decade) and the simulated convective precipitation trends (positive green contours, negative red contours, contoured at − 0.7, − 0.3, − 0.1, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.7 mm / day / decade, shown only for 45 ° S — 45 ° N. (c)
As in (b) but for the TOGA CAM3 simulations.
NecktopPC From the abstract for the Rassol and Schneider paper from 1971: «An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol
background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface
temperature by
as much
as 3.5 ° K.
As to the question about documentation, the basic «GISS Surface
Temperature Analysis» page starts with a «
Background» section whose first paragraph contains the sentence: «Input data for the analysis,..., is the unadjusted data of GHCN, except that the USHCN station records were replaced by a later corrected version».
An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol
background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface
temperature by
as much
as 3.5 deg.K.
The sensitivity ocean circulation and energy balance to
background mixing and the criticality of ocean heat and freshwater fluxes, suggest that
as the Arctic Ocean changes, we should be tracking
background mixing the way we track
temperature and salinity.
The fact
background temperatures in 1977 were not
as hot very likely had something to do with the far less dire snowpack situation.
Bleaching should have been ongoing for millions of years,
as background temperatures have risen and fallen.
But even
as climate change probably isn't driving the weather pattern behind the drought, it is directing the
background temperatures: up.