And Eden Baylee has a great post on Bad Reviews and
Bad Author Behavior on her blog this week.
Not exact matches
The
authors also suggest that
bad actors could use AI to create «automated, hyper - personalized disinformation campaigns,» in which «Individuals are targeted in swing districts with personalized messages in order to affect their voting
behavior.»
God is not the
author of evil.8 However, God does reward and punish on the basis of good and
bad behavior.
Author Paul Tough says that outbursts and
bad behavior that point to trauma have the potential to be overlooked in order to deal with unruly students.
Susan Newman, social psychologist and
author of «Little Things Long Remembered: Making Your Children Feel Special Every Day,» said parents should discourage
bad behaviors by taking away privileges such as dessert, or setting an earlier bedtime.
This preference for seeing
bad people could be protective, the
authors suggest, because it might allow us to monitor threatening
behavior from afar.
«GVROs allow family members or intimate partners who identify a pattern of dangerous
behavior to intervene in advance of something
bad happening,» says lead
author Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH, an associate professor with the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research.
Opportunities for
bad behavior abound in Waldman's novel - the
author's prerogative.
A lot of people blame the indie movement, but some of the
worst social media
behavior I've seen comes from Big 5
authors who are following the dictates of their marketing departments.
With its claims that it was a reader - centric site and not a site for
authors — coupled with the admittedly
bad behavior of a few
authors — Amazon - owned Goodreads became a no man's land of review traffic for a while.
And while much of this might seem like nothing more than petty playground
behavior between children who honestly do not have a clear good guy or
bad guy, keep in mind that several ebook retailers incorporate the Goodreads» API into their sales pages, effectively posting book reviews that many in the Goodreads community knew to be false, and nothing more than an act of revenge against an
author; real - world sales decisions have been made by consumers based on these reviews.
Sites that allowed
authors to purchase blocks of reviews by the hundreds or even thousands gave consumers a legitimate reason to be mistrustful of any reviews, and the case of
bad behavior painting all indie
authors with the same brush was all to... [Read more...]
A lot of people blame the indie movement, but some of the
worst social media
behavior I've seen comes from traditionally published
authors who are following the dictates of their marketing departments.
I hope that you will keep in mind that the vast majority of
authors behave professionally and supportively and that almost all books provide much value to readers, and not let the
behavior of a few
bad eggs adversely affect your image of books and publishing at large.
If an
author dares respond, they gang up on him, panning all his books on multiple sites, and share the
author's «
bad behavior» publicly across their social networks.
The
authors hired actors to pose as clients displaying signs of the
worst self - defeating investment
behavior.
Cara also is the
Author of «
Bad to the Bone: Analyzing and Assessing Dog Bites,» a DVD designed to teach other dog
behavior consultants to assess the severity of dogs bites.
It was unclear what the
author thought was the best way to correct a really
bad behavior or issue.
Going beyond the common approach of teaching sit, stay, the
author compares the problem of
bad behavior from the owner's and the dog's perspective.
According to Steve Tobak, who is a consultant and
author, social media is at the root of selfish networking because it reinforces
bad behavior.
Interestingly, when wrongdoing partners do try to make up for
bad behavior, forgiving them boosts victims» self - respect and self - concept clarity.3 The
authors reasoned that offering amends signals to victims that they are safe and valued in their relationships, and so when partners apologize for
bad behavior, victims feel more secure if they choose to forgive.
The
authors of a new study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships2 propose that cheaters feel
bad about their indiscretions but try to feel better by reframing their past infidelities as uncharacteristic or an out - of - the - ordinary
behavior.
The
authors use the example of the locker room mentality which is often used to excuse inappropriate comments or
bad behavior.