Sentences with phrase «bad game performance»

Not exact matches

Tuesday's performance was the country's worst defeat since losing the 1950 final game to Uruguay in a tournament held in Brazil, a black mark on the nation's psyche known as the Maracanazo.
I noticed that after every bad game players with sh $ t performance (e.g flamini, mert) speaking on Arsenal.com about how sh $ t we were and how can we bounce back.
Ozil doesn't have bad games in between world class ones, he just has pitiful performances non-stop.
Non zat game is all about ze result but if wee lose it is about the performance and if it's bad it's a how you say a wake up call for us to do better with what we have
I can nitpick on each of our 14 players performance in this game if i want, but I happen to think that overall, obtaining a draw against a title contender playing away, especially playing with 10 men for almost 45 minutes, was not such a bad result after all, not only if the standard is applied to a fragile team such as AFC, but also if it were to be applied to some other «fantastic» team such as for example, Leicester... I can imagine that if we were to loose the game the way Leicester did at the Emirates, many (visitors to this site) would be condemning our players bottlers, chokers instead of hailing them for defending bravely for 20 minutes with 10 men... LOL..
You don't stay in the team because of your performance last season, its the last few games that should determine if you should play or not, until someone else has a bad run.
Six passes into the game, Appleby was on pace for his worst performance ever.
-- Wenger 2015 is stubborn, disinterested, old fashioned, clueless, no energy, no game plan, nothing to prove, COMFORTABLE = good / average players but the worst Arsenal performances av seen in a very long time
well its a yes we had a bad performance last night but to conclude that a striker is the priority then u did nt watch the game closely..
This may look bad and not be fun to watch, but both times it has produced games that were there for the winning if the offense delivered a decent performance.
All of our forwards had bad games, esp Ozil and Walcott, but luckily we had the personnel for a strong defensive performance.
The Coquelin — Cazorla combo should be scrapped after one bad performance and neglect all the games where they've absolutely dominated together..
I would also stop well short of calling it a great pitched game... but it was certainly effective, and I think to chalk it up as mostly luck and bad performance by the Nats is selling Bettis short a little bit.
But no one care to mention it is one of the best performance in defence — rather giving credits to Sunderland as the worst team in the league (fact is they never lose a single home game this season before this match).
X player can go with having 5 man of the match performances and be labeled as sh % t in the end bec of one bad game.
Every little bit counts for each of those teams, and with the committee referencing the concept of «controlling the game» last Tuesday, a 20 - 14 deficit against a bad Hoosiers team with 18 minutes to go will not help the Buckeyes much (TCU fell from No. 4 to 5 after a similar performance against Kansas).
Players should get the blame for their poor performance (coaches aren't teaching the players to play badly and they are as responsible for their game prep).
Wenger said, «It's always good to watch a game again because our second - half performance was not that bad, but we lost urgency and maybe we moved a little bit from team targets to individual targets.
There was a lot of bad football this past weekend, but the Miami Dolphins vs. Kansas City Chiefs game was the pinnacle of all the hot - garbage performances, in my eyes.
Baltimore harassed Ryan Tannehill into one of his worst performances of the year last weekend and has held opponents to just 222 passing yards per game in 2016.
Overall we showed that we are not that bad and that we can play against good teams, but we've seen good performances in individual games before, it's about making it through the entire season with that sort of commitment and it's all I've really asked for.
I cant even call you fans, get behind the team, our performance today was far from bad or average, fact is we controlled the whole game from minute 1 to the 98th minute.
As the current season hots up and enters one of the busiest and most important periods, for clubs like Arsenal that are still in the Champions League and the FA cup that is, Arsene Wenger knows that each game takes on more importance and a bad performance or two could really damage our hopes of success.
Bad performances come around sometimes, but gone are the days of humiliating scorelines in big games.
Tom Izzo said of Appling's performance against Miami that it was his worst game of the season.
Our best performances in recent years have often come in games we were not fancied for, and conversely some of the worst have been in games we were expected to win at a canter.
As for Ozil, pay him what he wants and make commensurate demands of him namely he is not allowed more than two bad games a season (and I don't mean crucial games) or else he will see the bench like any other inconsistent player, if he wants ballon d'or salary, we need ballon d'or performances from him on a consistent basis.
OK, I expected a bad performance because they haven't got much game time, but you can't do BASICS right.
Very very poor performance and got away with murder.If we do not get re inforcement in the key places we BADLY meed then no chance to do week in UCL nor to be able to hold to this slim lead at the top.i just digested man city game and that's what we lack.AMBITION and GUILE..
It was not the young Frenchman's best game since he returned to Arsenal from his loan spell with Charlton, but it was not a bad performance from him either and he was certainly not helped much by those around him.
There's judging numbers in games in January or December, when a team still has a lot of season left to potentially make up whatever bad loss or poor performance there is, and then there are games that have a bit higher leverage.
Scum came with a game plan to fustrate us yesterday none of our players played bad and none played really great but was a good team performance but I think it suprised us how much lack of ambition they had even palace had more ambition wen they came to us their bus was even bigger then Chelsea's COYG
Nacho is 29 now, but that is not too old for a defender in this day and age, and he is fantastic going forward as well as in defence, and I would be hard pressed to find a game where he gave a bad performance.
It was a bad performance but even though we lost last week the most important in football is to bounce back the week after and keep your faith in your game, which is what we tried to do and succeeded to do today.»
Looking back at Arsenal's game against Chelsea yesterday, I must say that our performance wasn't bad.
One of the worst performances I've ever seen from an Arsenal team, and we've had some really horrible games in recent years.
Why was Holding out of the squad completely after 1 bad game when Walcott and Ramsey have had years of mediocre performances?
The game was one of the worst Arsenal performances I have seen.
It appears to me that most of the people who comment negatively on Holding's two bad performances this season did not watch the games close enough.
Arsenal is having worst performance ever We will loose all matches, be relegated then silent Stan will wire all money this account and we will be left in huge debts Then we will have to sell emirates stadium and have our home games at stamford bridge Then Mourinho and all chelsea fans will laugh at us forever and ever and ever and we will live sadly ever after
«As well, we realised what we delivered was not good enough overall, but I must say we are all human beings and when you play 50 or 55 games it can happen that there's a bad performance, unfortunately.
how the heck can you pick out ozil from that performance when there was clearly other players who had a much worse game.
Knicks fans were less than thrilled with the performance — much like Lakers fans last week — since it leaves New York with just a half game advantage over the Timberwolves (who play later Saturday night) in the race for the worst record in the league.
In the interview, O'Conner discusses the league's financial performance this year, saying, «It wasn't a great year, it was a good year» because of bad weather that affected multiple teams» games and schedules.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The performances were still poor, and more importantly, the results were bad, especially in the big games.
(And yes, ranking 105th with an adjusted point total of 22.4 points per game qualified as massive progress in 2015, coming off of 2014's «maybe the worst offense I've ever seen» performance.)
They come after victories and defeats, good performances and bad, before games and after them and any other time he happens to feel like it.
He definitely did nt have a bad game, I thought he was good, but we've seen him pull out better performances.
It's too funny that no one said nothing about Cech 8 goals in 3 games but for the fans, he is a super star and you do not notice that from the day that Arsenal Bougth Cech the team is doing very bad or look no champions league and poor performance.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z