Bad hires seemed to haunt me forever which is why I quickly took to perfecting my own secret interview technique.
Not exact matches
Just as an employer wouldn't
hire an employee who
seems like a
bad business partner, an investor feels the same.
Sitting in the mint green van - dubbed Maisy by the
hire firm - with the rain hammering on the roof, parked up on a campsite outside Bude, it suddenly
seemed like the
worst idea in the world.
It
seems early on to follow in the footsteps of EXTRACT and CHLOE (low - grossers both, so maybe
bad idea) in that a woman tries to
hire Elektra (Gugino) to seduce her husband so they can be even in the «having affairs» department, but this is one of many notions that goes nowhere.
That Cattrall's accent is so
bad and no - one
seems to have realised during production is astonishing, and one wonders why Polanski didn't just throw in the towel and
hire a British actress to play this British character.
The
worst case is «
hire Greed and Panic to manage your investments,» though that
seems awfully popular.
In a victory for common sense (the least common sense of all, as we know...) I am happy to attest that while GOOD lateral
hiring is good for business,
BAD lateral hiring is bad for business, and the figures in this second piece of research seem to underline that quite neat
BAD lateral
hiring is
bad for business, and the figures in this second piece of research seem to underline that quite neat
bad for business, and the figures in this second piece of research
seem to underline that quite neatly.
Maybe
hiring a PR firm will help the Bar advance its message, but right now it just
seems to be making things
worse.
For better or for
worse, the belief
seems to be that you have to have a big case to warrant
hiring a litigation consultant.
So if they
seem bored and uninterested, it might be a sign your interview went
badly, or your interview answers missed the mark and didn't show the
hiring manager what they wanted.