Sentences with phrase «bad owners do»

Bad owners don't make it because they do nt know how to work with vendors and the ins and outs of the industry.

Not exact matches

Many small - business owners don't pay attention to financial statements or, worse yet, don't even do them on a regular basis.

«There's an emotional thing when you get a pretty ominous - looking letter from the IRS, [saying] you might have done bad things,» Tom Reese, owner of a hearing - aid retailer in Tennessee, told the Journal.

And the higher inflation goes, the worse an owner will do.

Ask any business owner how the economy is doing and you'll probably hear, «not bad.»

We did all the things Rutherford and Neil (and all the other modern dog - owner manuals) tell one never to do — we punished the dog, yelling at him when he was bad, and hit him when he was very bad.

For Hispanics (and possibly even for Asians — among whom Romney did even worse than among Hispanics), the message was that Romney's love for business owners was exceeded only by contempt for immigrants (legal and illegal).

If guns are bad, aren't a good deterrent to crime, and can get the owner shot (which, if you discount suicides, barely registers as a single percentage of gun injuries), why then do police and the military have them?

And then to make the issue worse, people thought it was a good idea to go to the LOCAL store, which is owned by a franchise owner, who may or may not have the same opinion as the franchisor and do what...?

We even come out and publicly declare it — our owner does, our CEO does and worst the manager does it too.

I can't wish a team i support bad simply because the coach, board and owner don't care about the team like i do.

There are so many issues that the memory fades from many of them, however I always thought the Suarez debarcle was one of the worst, Regardless of if Suarez was an «Arsenal Player» or not noone can doubt that he would have scores all of the goals that welbeck, Walcott and Giroud have missed and scored a number on top of that had he played for the AFC, the problem came with the desultory bid of $ 6 million plus a pound, this was always going to get right up the liverpool owners nose and was an insult from the offset in my mind this was done deliberately by Wenger and the board in order to say to the AFC fans that «well we tried to get him but....»

Just because fans hate their team's owner doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the league thinks the owner is bad.

Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend

What we do have is a Russian / American / British billionaire owner who is going through a billion dollar divorce, a billion dollar bad investment in NYC real estate, and a billion dollar stadium upgrade.

If a company is performing worse than expected, you don't blame the staff, you blame the manager, director, and owner.

Nobody's going to defend tax evasion here, but dabbling in it on a personal level doesn't really mean you're going to be a bad owner of a football club.

You didn't have to see Eddie DeBartolo Jr. and his bodyguard rough up two Packers fans outside Lambeau Field last January — Green Bay had just beaten Eddie D's boys for the third straight time, knocking them out of the playoffs for the second consecutive season — to know that the 49ers» owner was in a bad mood.

Are some of you on here missing a few brain cells as fans There is nothing Arsenal or Wenger can do with the Sanchez situation He wants to leave and has been offered 400k a week in wages who in their right mind is going to turn that down as a player As for blaming wenger who has been our most successful manager helped us build a stadium gave us 20 years of cl football and some of the best teams the ol has seen Including the invincible and you all have the Gaul to trash the man as if he has done nothing for the club I suggest you should look at the plastic fans in the Arsenal blogs that have created a toxic atmosphere at the club They attack their own players in a daily basis why would any top player come to s club where the manager the owners and players are shamelessly attached constantly Yet Wenger wins trophies regularly even them that is derided Look at Spurs Liverpool they win fuk all every year yet their fans back then Look at yourselves and all the negativity that you have created striking the club before you blame Wenger for everything I have been a season ticket holder since the 70s and never have I seen our fanbase been so full of entitled morons who have stopped backing the club and constantly deride the club snd attack it We have the worst fanbase in football you have made this great club a lagging stock in world football All you now us fans constantly moaning If you don't like Arsenal fc then buy out kronke and run the club or fuk off and support someone else You won't be missed Coyg

It also shows, that not only are we in a terrible state on the pitch, we are also in one just as bad off the pitch, because the required rebuilding of the squad, can not be done without new investment from the club / board / owner.

(unfortunately banks do nt buy in to we will win the league for the next decade to give out money) from the cub before they lend then shed lots of cash, and this unfortunately leads to clubs putting up there ticket prices to reflect the cost of big progress, so people sometimes have to realize that the club has to find a way to make club grow, and if they do nt have deep pocketed owners then they have to pitch to the banks for a loan, like we did all those years ago an we are just over the worst of it now we have paid our dues and are now getting back among the big boys again.

We can argue the pro's and cons of an oligarch owner all day but if he invests in the club and makes a manager accountable and therefore do his job, can it really be a bad thing?

who doesn't want to b behind their team... every arsenal fan want team to win and b the mighty arsenal again but whn things are as bad as whn the owner says he is not here to win, the club is sagnant in its approch for 12 years, the manager blames the fans for his failure and players pkay without the fighting spirit its very hard for fans to motivate themselves whn they know what is stored for them again the next season TIME FOR CHANGE!!

What I do not believe, is that you think Kroenke is anything more than very bad for arsenal, and that with a better more ambitious owner, arsenal wouldn't have done a lot better since 2007.

Another season done and dusted and we didn't even make it until Xmas this time... seriously, what has to happen before the Gunner fans in North London grow a pair and rid our club of these overpaid losers (Wenger & Gazidis) and our absentee landlord of an owner... I warned you plenty of times what was going to happen but, as per usual, the spineless season ticket holders fell for the usual trappings and failed to see the writing on the wall... mark my words, things are going to get much worse come January and beyond

Stan doesn't rank among one of the worst owners?

Its right that it is ambition but you should consider the amount of Money so called Pep has spent because of oil king owner... You can not go and randomly compare the situation... Wenger is bad in recent years but it doesn't mean that Pep is world class... Look at his record??

Um pesonal experiments sorry nobody gave him 150million pounds to sign eonaldo or messi or 100 million pounds to sign a player oh plus another 400million to fill out the other ten sorry he was given ants and has still won our record signing 55million i mean other teams are able to spend more on bench sore pine slivered second strings than hes been on starters over the years and hes still won only manager invincible oh and then when the other clubs new we were low on cash and winning started injuring our star players and do nt say it does nt happen cause it does um he still won whole given ants to spend hes done amazing extend please one or to bad seasons compared to twenty great seasons and had our strikers finished their chances this year in 5 or six key matches we'd be sitting pretty reall only 3 or two and a draw or saw and we'd be sittingin the thick of itextend now that the board an owner are willing to spend snails for him finally atleast a little more than ants cause of inflation

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

I don't like the way he took money out last year, but him not interfering with the club isn't really a bad thing, at least he doesn't try and rebrand Arsenal and go against the supporters like owners at some other clubs have done.

And a new owner With Wenger still at the club, we shall always have more of such complains, bad referee, biased FA, etc.Winners never complain.I do nt remember seeing such complaints in our unbeaten season

Its not about the money he takes out of the club or that he doesn't invest, being self sufficient is not a bad thing to be... its certainly better than being loaded down with debt like some of our rivals owners have done to their clubs.

I'm obviously nobody related to this, but looking at this from the outside, if I were a Manager or owner, I'd be thinking, this guy is a great player, no doubt, but if he doesn't get his way he could be an annoyance or worse.

And it's only gonna get worse trust me don't fall for wengers or arsenal rubbish it's all about creating a delusion for them tiny petty owners and manager so they can make money

Remember we do not appear to be being run by a football loving owner but a business man and he could well bring in someone far worse than what we have.

I'd say it can't get any worse, but we are kroenke's best performing team, the rest of his clubs generally do a lot worse in their leagues, I wonder how far we could potentially sink and it still be acceptable to an owner who is used to garbage clubs???

Things didn't work out for Mourinho either, with the Portuguese manager being dismissed from his post in the Stamford Bridge hot - seat by the club's Russian billionaire owner Roman Abramovich in December, having led Chelsea to their worst start to a top - flight campaign since the 1960s.

It is a fact that our net spend is less than the interest the owners receive on loans to the club The money spent on players only makes up part of what we didn't spend last year Other clubs spending about # 60 million outside top 6 We should try for Barkley for # 30m pay Lanzini # 100 k a week which we pay to less good players and plan to play Rice with Reid at CB as he's better than all the other CB's we have Buying Kone for more than # 6 mill would be a waste of money Sunderland supporters think he's the worst CB in premiership last season!

FSG aren't bad owners but that doesn't make them the right owners.

For the record we don't think FSG are the worst owners but we also don't believe they are the best owners.

Matters have taken such a turn for the worse that folk are even suggesting that the defending champions may struggle to even retain their status as a Champions League competitor for 2011/2012, and with this in mind it does make you wonder just how many more setbacks club owner Roman Abrahimovich, who does have a ruthless reputation when it comes to hiring and firing of manager's at Stamford Bridge, is willing to tolerate.

Results in the Premier League are really bad, but I think the owner knows who I am, what I gave to the club and the owner believes I am the right person to do the job.»

This is in contrast to other kinds of organizations for which the members / owners would be personally liable if the organization did something bad.

SEO Blog Ireland About - Lots of business owners waste money on SEO that doesn't work or, worse still, actually damages rankings.

If you are thinking online teen dating and joining a new site it's so important to do your research first and make sure you don't end up somewhere that has been created purely as a financial venture for the owner or one that is notorious for having bad security features as these types of sites will not give you the results you are after and could cause you many problems.

Furthermore, Nowhere in the article does the author mention how this is bad for the Wii U, unless you count the part where the author says «it's a blow for Wii U owners waiting for another game»; paraphrased) which is just an opinionated fact.

It's a free open beta for everyone globally, including console owners (which is why it's called the «Second Beta») although it is specifically for PC via Steam, so if you don't use Steam - bad luck.

Don't feel too bad for the R's owners — the R is still worth roughly double its original MSRP.

It will be fine for many owners» purposes, but if cargo capacity is your main consideration, the Aygo does lose out badly to the Hyundai i10, VW Up, Skoda Citigo and SEAT Mii, all of which offer capacities north of 250 litres.

Realistically, many truck owners — even those in the biggest - «n» - baddest 4x4s — never use their vehicles anywhere close to capacity, and the Ridgeline can handle most of the tasks they actually do.