Not exact matches
Explore how Smarter
Balanced uses key considerations related to the concepts of universal design, accessibility, bias, and sensitivity to develop and
review items and tasks.
The following resources, which are also referenced in other parts of the collection, were developed to build educators» capacity to develop and
review items and tasks for the Smarter
Balanced Summative assessment.
Working with K - 12 educators and higher education faculty, Smarter
Balanced developed,
reviewed, and tested thousands of assessment
items and performance tasks.
On behalf of parents of public school students across Connecticut, I am writing to request that you add an agenda
item to the April 6, 2015 State Board of Education Committee meeting to
review and address the actions taken by your Interim Commissioner of Education and other State Department of Education staff as they relate to the issue of a parent's fundamental and inalienable right to opt their children out of the Common Core Smarter
Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) testing program and how local school districts should deal with children whose parents have opted them out of the SBAC testing.
To determine these facets of alignment, HumRRO conducted a series of workshops during which participants
reviewed the alignment among the Smarter
Balanced content and
item specifications, the Smarter
Balanced blueprint, and the Common Core State Standards.
Our firm offers free case
reviews at no cost to you to help protect your consumer rights anytime you: • Receive contact from a creditor or debt collector to collect a debt; • Receive unwanted computerized robocalls or texts to your cell phone (even after you've told them to stop); • Notice inaccurate information on your credit report (even after you disputed with the credit bureaus); • Obtain a loan, lease, or purchase an
item on credit; • Enter into an autopay arrangement with a creditor (i.e., gym membership, car loan, etc.); • Purchase a lemon vehicle or other consumer product; • Need help settling debts for less than the full
balance; or, • Have any other consumer issue you would like us to look into at no cost to you.
Re: # 46 The factcheck.org
item strikes me as a good - faith attempt at
balance that fell prey to the usual journalistic pitfall; that is, it poses on one side the IPCC consensus view and on the other individual detractors like Patrick Michaels (citing 3 blog entries by him, no less — not peer -
reviewed papers).
An extensive
review of the sales records, reconciling them to purchases and stock, analysing work in progress and long term contracts, modelling customer purchasing patterns, and an analytical
review of debtors and creditors, showed that the directors had fraudulently inflated sales by recording sales before goods despatched, hid increases in debtors in fixed assets and other
balance sheet
items, and had double counted invoices and proformas relating to the same sales.