Sentences with phrase «banning abortion does»

Banning abortion does not make it go away; it only makes it unsafe.»

Furthermore, as I became more involved in the feminist conversation (some feminists are pro-life, of course, but many are pro-choice), I began to understand some of the arguments against the criminalization of abortion, like that banning abortion does not necessarily reduce the abortion rate, that enforcing a ban on all abortions would be impossible, and that women would likely seek out abortions through unsafe, illegal procedures anyway.

Not exact matches

But Kasich did sign into law a measure banning abortions after 20 weeks — another controversial regulation that could potentially brush up against previous court rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legislation.

So, Democrats — including several Catholics, such as Senator Tim Kaine, who are «personally» though not professionally opposed to abortion — voted to filibuster the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, and the Republican leaders who could have moved a bump stock ban bill to the floor after the Las Vegas massacre did not.

I do understand why it's overcrowded, but do you really think those problems with the biological parents will somehow magicly disapear if we ban abortion and force these women to give birth?

Frum does not favor banning abortion and his concerns about the state of the modern conservative movement in the United States are well documented.

And he was right to remark that the question was ridiculously irrelevant, given that no state wants to ban contraceptives right now (but some do want to ban and a good number restrict abortion).

And it was Doe's broad definition of «health» as «well - being» that the Court would later use to strike down even bans on the cruel procedure known as partial - birth abortion.

George W. Bush was Pro-Life and had a majority in both houses of Congress yet did not offer a bill banning abortion.

Thus, babies available for adoption do not go to the highest bidder; prostitution is banned or regulated; and neither divorce nor abortion is available on demand.

Justice John Paul Stevens (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) stated: «Although much ink is spilled today describing the gruesome nature of late «term abortion procedures, that rhetoric does not provide me a reason to believe that the procedure Nebraska here claims it seeks to ban is more brutal, more gruesome, or less respectful of «potential life» than the equally gruesome procedure [D&E] Nebraska claims it still allows.»

The ban does not stop abortions.

They want «In God We Trust» on our money (1954), they want evolution banned from schools while allowing a REVISED pledge of allegiance that originally did not include the phrase «under God», they want laws that reflect Christian morality (Abortion, same s3x marriage, etc.), and they treat as outcasts anyone who doesn't align with their particular religious view.

Jose Miguel Vivanco of Human Rights Watch said: «The new penal code [banning abortion] doesn't just go against basic human rights: It goes against fundamental principles of humanity».

Two provisions do represent a change from the status quo, however: the mandate for providing a 12 months» supply of contraceptive drugs, and the ban on copayments for abortion.

While it didn't get as much attention as the (thankfully) failed vote by the Senate to ban abortions after 20 weeks in January — never mind that abortion that late in a term is both rare, and nearly always because the fetus has a catastrophic ailment — John Faso voted in favor of the same legislation in the House this past fall.

Meanwhile, many of the topics now banned (Ravitch has appended a list running from abortion and addiction to witchcraft and yachting) did not play much of a role in educational materials even before the rise of political correctness.

In light of Monday's women - led strike in Poland, in which thousands of people in over sixty cities gathered to protest the government's proposal to completely ban abortion, If You Don't Know Me By Now, You Will Never Never Never Know Me at Fundacja Arton seems exceptionally prescient.

«I take it that abortion rights activists in California wouldn't be persuaded by anti-abortion activists» arguments that «Oh, don't worry, we won't ban abortions in California, since obviously we wouldn't have the votes; we're just trying to ban them in Texas.»

(Order, p. 4) The Court notes that «[i] t is settled law that the government's refusal to subsidize abortion does not impermissibly burden a woman's right to obtain an abortion,» and that since Indiana's ban on funding does not directly violate the abortion right, it can not be unconstitutional.

«These outrageous claims are flat - out untrue, but that doesn't matter to politicians with a longstanding political agenda to ban abortion and defund Planned Parenthood.

«From the beginning, this relentless campaign has been about one thing: antiabortion extremists who will do anything — lie, twist facts, villainize providers, and even reportedly break the law — in their quest to ban abortion and block millions from accessing basic reproductive health care,» she said in a statement to The Washington Post.

Some states have banned coverage of abortion altogether, and some plans just don't cover abortion services and procedures.

That law, like all TRAP laws, had nothing to do with women's health or common sense — and everything to do with shutting down health centers and banning abortion.

Until 1987, when the Reagan administration issued the so - called gag rule, that provision consistently had been interpreted as a ban on the use of Title X funds to pay for abortions, and the federal regulations governing Title X did not otherwise reflect an antiabortion animus toward providers.