Basic Aid districts get funded due to the original «hold harmless» provisions of RLI.
There's also the misguided belief among many that excess tax /
basic aid district are sapping the system.
Not exact matches
In conjunction with Team Nutrition, the Department has produced a Local Wellness Policy handout (2006) to inform others in the school about federal wellness requirements and to help
aid districts in the
basic requirements for local wellness policies.
In doing so, State education spending will remain under the school
aid cap while providing all
districts with sufficient funds to provide a sound
basic education.6
It was constructed and funded by Action
Aid Ghana at a cost of GHC150, 000.00 for Kwame Brentim
Basic School at Brentim in the Tain
District of Brong - Ahafo Region.
Instead of $ 250 million for those grants, they agreed to $ 50 million, freeing up $ 200 million to put back into the
basic operating
aid to school
districts.
But it would guarantee
districts as much
basic aid for each of the next four years as they received this year, so poorer
districts would see only relatively small increases in state
aid...
If I understand what Navigio has written, it appears as if «revenue limits» (what is in the «alligator chart») is the «
basic aid» given to
Districts and is «unrestricted.»
Is this proposed measure really simply a way to protect property - rich «
Basic Aid» school
districts where local property tax revenues exceed the amounts
districts would otherwise receive from the usual state funding formulas?
You encourage states to withhold
basic funding as well, as evidenced by Governor Cuomo's threat to withhold
basic state school
aid unless
districts implement a teacher evaluation based on test scores.
Funding in some «
basic aid»
districts — the roughly 10 percent of
districts with enough property wealth to finance schools outside of state funding — has exceeded the average by $ 3,000 or more per student.