Here's an axiom to consider, a basic truth I bet politicians and municipal bureaucrats understand better than anyone else:
Basic infrastructure costs a lot of money and it requires ugly work that's hard to get done on time and on budget and it never, ever pulls in the votes.
Not exact matches
This freedom is best achieved by adopting the classical policy of taxing land rent and other natural resource rent, and to regulate the price of
basic infrastructure services and natural monopolies to keep their prices in line with necessary
costs of production.
Their self - destructive real estate bubble has loaded down their labor force with high debt service and housing
costs, whilst their giveaway of public
infrastructure to insiders (with no price regulation) has led to high
basic living
costs.
Governments were expected to tax away land rent and natural resource rent, regulate monopolies to bring prices in line with actual
cost value, and create
basic infrastructure with money created by their own treasury or central bank.
We need to increase the levels of spending on
basic science, creating new knowledge, and make certain that the money is maximized, both in the direct
costs of funding research and the indirect
costs of the
infrastructure, such as buildings and equipment.
I'd agree with you 100 % that «the poorest countries will suffer the most» if they are prevented from developing a reliable, low -
cost energy
infrastructure based, where possible, on local
basic energy resources, to lift themselves out of poverty (as we in the industrialized world did a century ago).