Sentences with phrase «because allocation decisions»

Because allocation decisions that cause poor results at the end of 10 years cause investors to lower their stock allocations at bad times for doing so.

Not exact matches

It should be no surprise that many countries in the late stages of their own investment - growth «miracles» have tried this kind of transformation, but none has ever managed so radical a change within its financial sector quickly enough, at least in part because the capital allocation decision is at the heart of distributional politics.

Remember, you're already far better off than the vast majority of investors because you selected an asset allocation with your eyes wide open to its historical returns and volatility, so you can rest easily knowing that you made a well - educated decision.

«Because of the continued allocation of funds from the Barnett Formula [used to allocate Scotland's share of the UK budget], and because of the power to raise revenue within the Scottish Parliament, then the final decision about what we spend on the NHS is not going to be made by anyone outside ScBecause of the continued allocation of funds from the Barnett Formula [used to allocate Scotland's share of the UK budget], and because of the power to raise revenue within the Scottish Parliament, then the final decision about what we spend on the NHS is not going to be made by anyone outside Scbecause of the power to raise revenue within the Scottish Parliament, then the final decision about what we spend on the NHS is not going to be made by anyone outside Scotland.

Examples of collections that would not generally fall under the fast - track process are: (i) surveys that require statistical rigor because they will be used for making significant policy or resource allocation decisions; (ii) collections whose results are intended to be published; and (iii) collections that are intended for basic research and that do not directly benefit the agency's service delivery.

The asset allocations in the target allocation table above are referred to as «neutral» because they do not reflect any decisions made by the Adviser to overweight or underweight an asset class.

I'm sharing this little anecdote because it's a reminder that choosing an appropriate asset allocation is the most important investment decision you'll ever make.

Asset allocation is the most important investment decision an investor will make in their portfolio because it explains most of the risk and return.

This means that you do not change your asset allocation decision, because of tax considerations.

Second - guessing your asset allocation decisions because they «aren't working» this year will cost you much, much more than you can ever add with a 2 % tweak here and there.

That's a key question in the asset allocation decision, because investment objectives — which drive the asset allocation decision — change over one's lifetime.

The asset allocations in the «Choosing a Freedom Fund» section above are referred to as «neutral» because they do not reflect any decisions made by the Adviser to overweight or underweight an asset class.

However, a counter argument can be made that a regime is just if total emissions from the area within the jurisdiction of the government are below the government's fair share of safe global emission regardless of whether some emitters are not covered by the government's ghg allocation because governments have the right to make decisions distributing the burdens and benefits of government policies within their jurisdiction.

Moreover, the Court of Appeal found that the Allocation Decision could not be considered arbitrary simply because it excluded US$ 4 billion in bondholder guarantee claims from the pro rata aAllocation Decision could not be considered arbitrary simply because it excluded US$ 4 billion in bondholder guarantee claims from the pro rata allocationallocation.

But it is a giant step to say that because a court could (occasionally and unpredictably) make a decision about allocation of risk between the parties that would affect tax consequences for non-parties, one should discourage private resolution by mediation.

Because representative bodies are poorly resourced, they will have to make difficult resource allocation decisions in order to be effective.