Because by their very nature anyone you send them to can change them!
Divorce mediation is more confidential than divorce litigation
because by its very nature it minimizes the number of filings...
Divorce mediation is more confidential than divorce litigation
because by its very nature it minimizes the number of filings you must submit to the court.
Not exact matches
Even so, this has the potential to be the most damaging for the victims
because a credit bureau,
by its
very nature, collects all the most sensitive information about people.
PR can generate interest primarily
because of the medium: News stories
by their
very nature are more credible than advertisements.
«Beauty... is the one aim which
by its
very nature is self - justifying,»
because «the teleology of the universe is directed to the production of beauty» (AI 266, 265).
Jargon
by its
very nature alienates people
because not everyone can understand it.
But that's OK
because we are beloved
by God not
because of our religious beliefs; but
because unconditional love between the Three Persons of the Holy Trinity and for their creation is the
very Nature of God.
your understanding of the change process is
very simplistic,
because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay
because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated
by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in
nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.
Man no longer lives in
nature but in a civilization, in a world which is perhaps
very inhuman,
because made
by man, but at all events in a man - made world.
AIH is wrong
because the act of insemination is not the natural act which,
by its
very nature, is expressive of love.
The cosmic enterprise is like a great adventure, in which deity moves out towards the creatures — not as if it were only an incidental or accidental act of God, but
because God
by very necessity of the divine
nature itself is constantly outgoing, self - identifying, receptive, and responsive.
These experiences can not be reduced to material causes
because they are
by their
very nature subjective, and can not be objective or quantifiable.
He would not be a human being if omnisicent
because human beings are not ominscient
by their
very nature.
Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit,
by it's
very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth,
because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.
the reason you did nt include it is simply
because it highlighted what you did nt want to talk about, namely that ANY passage in dispute is clearly identified as such, AND that
nature of the dispute makes it
VERY clear that whether or not there was a later change or not is still not determined
by any measure.
Of course, a few straight - forward deductions / credits, such as the child tax credit could remain, particularly
because by it's
very nature it's going to benefit the rich less (ie: the number of children in a family do not go up in proportion to the amount of income)
I remember one essay in particular; the author argued that we can not use subjective words such as «feminine» as a descriptor of women
because,
by very nature of womanhood, if you are a woman, then it is, in fact, regardless of stereotypes, feminine.
Jesus will always prove intractably enigmatic, indeed an impossible subject for plastic representation of any kind, precisely
because He is a Subject who
by His
very nature resists being subjected to what we deem to be observable being interpreted exclusively in terms of cosmic perceptibility (p. 23).
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly
because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced
by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players,
very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger
because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory
nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted
by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed
by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model
because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue
because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic
because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
:: telling you (
because there were more emails and comments than I could answer) that in last week's -LCB- this moment -RCB- post, the hammock is
by Nature's Sway (and yes, we like it
very much), and the print is
by Nikki McClure.
It is
very hard to define or diagnose nut allergies
because by nature, all food allergies are difficult to diagnose.
One of the justifications that liberals make for the regulation and taxation of corporations is that corporations are
by their
very nature government - subsidized enterprises,
because the government gives them limited liability status, i.e. it makes it so that even though the shareholders control what the corporation does, they are not personally liable for damages due to what the corporation does, beyond the money they've invested.
The official, who spoke on background given the sensitivity of securing the president, noted the Intrepid «
by its
very nature is a
very secure place»
because it is across the West Side Highway from the rest of the city.
The discovery is even more surprising
because pulsars
by nature are not
very massive objects and so have always been assumed capable of only relatively moderate X-ray signals.
Because water ice, if it is there, could only exist in dark, cold recesses, the signature probably was caused
by very rough or blocky terrain, the team argues in the paper presenting the result in the October 19 issue of
Nature.
There are only
very few circumstances in which one can investigate the repeatability of evolution,
because spatially independent environments that are populated
by the same species are extremely rare in
nature.
The field of regenerative medicine,
because of the
very nature of the science and the rapidly evolving clinical developments, not infrequently lends itself to often close calls between what constitutes an individualized treatment being performed
by a doctor within the scope of his medical practice on the one hand, and what constitutes a medical product that is currently subject to the authorities Congress has already charged the FDA with exercising.
It doesn't matter what plastic you use
because all plastics contain phthalates
by their
very nature.
I'm kind, caring and
very loyal or so Im told
by friends.I've always been hard working
by nature; mainly
because I enjoy and value a good life.
Despite Thomas Pynchon's knack for vivid, cinematic language and his own avowed love of film, his novels haven't exactly proved easy to adapt for the big screen, primarily
because they're so densely constructed that any adaptation would be,
by its
very nature, a dumbing down — and even then you'd still run the risk of ending up with something completely incomprehensible.
Because of the
very nature of the film (it's an extremely dialog - heavy pic with a
very heavy undertone) it is somewhat of a hard sell, but this really is a great little indie worth checking out if not for the subject then for the terrific performances
by Segel and Eisenberg.
Because unions,
by their
very nature, thrive on the idea that the rank - and - file are in bitter struggle, they emphasize unity and common cause over and above everything else.
Dialogic models are,
by their
very nature, responsive to the problems identified, and
because of this, generative in terms of both problem identification and solution.
Yes exactly,
because DRM never hurts those who pirate books, as pirated books
by their
very nature have no DRM at all and are truly user friendly.
But most of my webcomics, like Dice With The Universe, that I'm doing at the moment,
by the
very nature of the project, I have to make it up week on week in Dice
because I don't know what's going to happen until the audience roll dice at the end of each week.
I chose to self - publish
because I'm a
very independent person
by nature and the more I learned about traditional publishing more I didn't feel that it was for me.
My question is: did we see flawed ratings of CDOs, CMBS etc.
because of moral corruption and complacency at the ratings agencies, or
because risk is
by its
very nature hard to model?
After all, that's standard practice for common loans like car loans («gap» insurance exists
because car loans are so frequently underwater) and student loans (
by their
very nature are 100 % unsecured).
Blue chip drug makers such as Merck (MRK) have historically been
very popular with income investors
because of their defensive
nature, meaning that drug demand isn't really affected
by economic downturns.
First of all, many of the companies within the materials sector are cyclical
because,
by their
very nature, they are
very sensitive to the state of the general economy.
Both of these types of diets remain
very nutritionally balanced and healthy for your pet, but
because of their unique
nature, are only available
by prescription from a veterinarian.
By their
very nature, retractables train dogs to pull while on leash,
because they learn that pulling extends the lead.
You could argue that the group was actually truly representative of the «industry» as the
very nature of travel blogging means that the younger end of travel blogging especially is over represented
by people from white, middle class backgrounds
because people who aren't from that background simply can't afford to take time out to travel... despite what some blogs might say.
By its
very nature this is a game that is best experienced with a group of pals and a talented killer,
because with those things it's thrilling.
Julian Cox, co-curator of the exhibition, believes Mandel did not become better known
because «she was a
very private person,
very modest
by nature, and she really created her greatest work before there was such a thing as an art market for photography.
This effect turns out to be relatively small
because it is proportional in
nature, and thus results in a
very small absolute increase when growth is suppressed i the first place
by limited growing seasons.
Also,
because,
by their
very nature, extreme events are rare, it would not be possible to have a meaningful statistical trend until a large amount of global warming had already happened.
I reached out to Pierrehumbert
because he is one of many authors of «Consequences of twenty - first - century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea - level change,» an important new
Nature Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a
very,
very,
very long impact (tens of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven
by the conversion, in our lifetimes, of vast amounts of fossil fuels into useful energy.
It is a
very gross assumption that the carbon cycle varies
by less than 0.02 % p.a.
because few — if any — other processes in
nature are that stable.