Sentences with phrase «because emissions data»

Not exact matches

But a recent study in PNAS suggested that wind (and other renewables) will fall short of slashing carbon emissions, because there just isn't enough of it in the U.S. Based on data from a company owned by one of the study's authors, this map's white areas show where wind turbines would be most effective — but because wind isn't available all the time, they'd only produce roughly 50 percent of the energy wind turbines could at maximum capacity.

The results, recently published in Science of the Total Environment, is surprising because long - term trends had shown a decrease in mercury emissions whereas data collected between 2007 and 2013 indicate an unsettling upturn from the Rocky Mountains to the Midwest.

Pinning down reliable data for carbon emissions in Chinese companies has long been a challenge because of doubts over the quality of their energy use records.

Jiang said that Chinese companies will also likely report their emissions data accurately, because a carbon tax, considered as a production cost, can ease their financial pressure of paying value - added taxes.

But Gray and Baliunas found a hint of an 11 - year cycle in their data because the star's calcium emission was strongest in 1980 and 1991.

Howarth said he is particularly concerned about fracking emissions because recent data indicates that the planet is entering a period of rapid climate change.

«The Trump administration doesn't want this data because it doesn't want to rein in oil companies» massive emissions of this dangerous greenhouse gas.»

«We needed that long because the target is so faint, we need enough strength of signal to process the data to concentrate on such quiescent emissions and to get the signatures identified firmly.»

Once all data are in, energy - related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2013 are expected to be roughly 2 % above the 2012 level, largely because of a small increase in coal consumption in the electric power sector.

The Chandra data reveal 95 young stars glowing in X-ray light, 41 of which had not been seen previously using Spitzer because they lacked infrared emission from a surrounding disk.

They say analysis of the 30 data points is more informative about likely future emissions than national figures in wider use because it allows errors to be tracked more closely.

Because this climate sensitivity is derived from empirical data on how Earth responded to past changes of boundary conditions, including atmospheric composition, our conclusions about limits on fossil fuel emissions can be regarded as largely independent of climate models.

We call it a concept, because obviously we don't have any certified data for things such as emissions and so on [at the moment].

That is why completion emissions in this study are lower — because the regulation was beginning to have the desired effect — remember the data reported were collected in 2012.

A) Those who think that governments around the world should take action to reduce CO2 emissions because data collected in the last 30 years indicates that recent changes in climate can be traced to CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels during various human activities.

Back when HP announced they were releasing supply chain emissions data, we were pretty happy because that's a move in a direction we want to see.

probably because the data do not show that warming is related to emissions.

Potential emissions data offers a complimentary perspective here because, when combined with data on reserve size, it is an indicator of the carbon intensity of future production.

The UNFCCC secretariat does not make estimates of global CO2 and GHG emissions, because the requirements for reporting GHG data are different for Annex I and non-Annex I Parties.

Including more days allows researchers to collect more accurate data, because emissions can be higher or lower on a given day, and can also be impacted by emissions plumes from other regions.

The study is the first to look at the carbon impact of every kind of ecosystem in Alaska, many of which have been excluded from official government tallies of the state's greenhouse gas emissions because of a lack of data, said study co-author A. David McGuire, a USGS scientist and professor of land ecology at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Because this climate sensitivity is derived from empirical data on how Earth responded to past changes of boundary conditions, including atmospheric composition, our conclusions about limits on fossil fuel emissions can be regarded as largely independent of climate models.

They keep faking data, because the «Greenhouse» theory, which underlies all climate projections of human impact through carbon emissions has remained unchallenged until now.

Even so; I'm going to look at the CO2 emissions data here, because although it's not the correct approach for finding the appropriate scenario, you are doing it incorrectly and doing it right would tend to indicate scenario B as well.

However, because of issues related to data quality, the low frequency of extreme event impacts, limited length of the time series, and various societal factors present in the disaster loss record, it is still not possible to determine the portion of the increase in damages that might be attributed to climate change brought about by greenhouse gas emissions (S1).

This balance probably is not affected by the omission of black carbon emissions because they increase little between 1940 and 1970 relative to increases during other decades of the 1850 — 2000 period for which data are available (10).

Until IPCC come to terms with the current «lack of warming» despite unabated human GHG emissions and concentrations reaching record levels, they are avoiding or ignoring an important «data point» in the «science» (because it doesn't fit the «religious beliefs»?).

So when he gets annoyed when people are finicky about the data or processes used — we need to realise that he really believes we will soon need to vacate the planet because of our emissions.

Weak negative correlations were found between the mean annual NCEP RH and cirrus over oceans, but again, most of the data over oceans are in the air traffic corridors where contrail formation and raw aircraft emissions could affect the cirrus trends more than over land because of greater susceptibility in the more pristine marine air.

Not only were these studies out of date, I argued, because they used grid data from 2010 (despite radical changes in our electricity mix since then), but they also looked at driving emissions only — not offering a cradle - to - grave analysis of cars» true emissions.

Simply put the physical data refutes the IPCC contention that the atmospheric CO2 concentration is increasing because of increaseing CO2 emissions from fossil fuels because the rate of atmospheric CO2 concentration is actually decreasing with increased emissions.

Furthermore, because data on the origin and destination of coal are available only for coal distribution, EIA's emission factors for coal consumption by sector assume that the mix of coal received during a certain year was the same as that consumed in that year.