Because fossil fuel production peaks and subsequently declines, production per capita will also decline.
Not exact matches
Jennifer Metzger, co-founder of Rosendale - based Citizens for Local Power (CLP), says it has vociferously opposed the NCZ not only
because it raises rates but also
because it incentivizes
fossil fuel production, in direct opposition to the NYSERDA programs.
«When it comes to life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, wind and solar energy provide a much better greenhouse gas balance than
fossil - based low carbon technologies,
because they do not require additional energy for the
production and transport of
fuels, and the technologies themselves can be produced to a large extend with decarbonized electricity,» states Edgar Hertwich, an industrial ecologist from Yale University who co-authored the study.
David Rutledge, an engineering professor at the California Institute of Technology who studies world coal
production, said the IPCC's «business as usual» scenario is unrealistic
because it essentially assumes that growth of
fossil fuels like coal will continue apace, which is unlikely.
Implementation of this policy commitment would also render unnecessary continued substantial expenditure on
fossil fuel exploration,
because any new discoveries could not lead to increased aggregate
production.
One article I was recently reading stated that hemp seed oil produces a cleaner buring
fuel (nearly 90 % burn, with considerably less ash and CO2
production) than any
fossil fuel (33 % burn at the most efficient) and was actually banned
because the oil industry (and the rope industry, as hemp weave made a stronger and less expensive rope than current materials) decided to push their congresscritters to close it down
because hemp could make Marijuana.
There is a raging battle today about the size of
fossil fuel reserves and resources, with «peakists» claiming that we are already at or near peak
production of both oil and coal
because the amounts of economically recoverable
fuels in the ground are more limited than the
fossil fuel industry has admitted.
Because it's a tax on energy
production by
fossil fuels that primarily
fuel our livelihood, it's a tax on virtually everything we do.
They are destroying the industries,
because they use
fossil fuel - > back primitive
production by hand.
Utilities prefer wind energy
because the intermittent
production at the wrong time of the day becomes a token excuse to build more
fossil and nuclear
fueled power plants.
Because Ontario is contractually obligated to pay for most of the
production costs of curtailed and exported energy, OSPE believes it would be better to find productive uses for the surplus clean electricity to displace
fossil fuel consumption in other economic sectors.
Cheap
fossil fuels are here to stay
because production costs are tumbling.
Burning
fossil fuels is unsustainable
because the rate of natural
production of
fossil fuels is almost infinitely slower than the rate of use, resulting in a damaging build up of CO2 in the atmosphere and oceans.
Because of the variable, unpredictable, and uncontrollable nature of wind
production, backup
fossil -
fuelled generation has to be run simultaneously to stabilize the grid on an increasing scale as more wind
production is added.
This can occur through (1) relocation of energy - intensive
production in non-constrained regions; (2) increased consumption of
fossil fuels in these regions through decline in the international price of oil and gas triggered by lower demand for these energies; and (3) changes in incomes (thus in energy demand)
because of better terms of trade.
We focus on the
fossil fuel industry
because we view the
production and consumption of oil, gas and coal as sources of global warming, human rights abuses, war, national security concerns, corporate globalization, and increased inequality.
And even if this Court were to issue a nationwide injunction against all
fossil fuel production, such an order would not abate the alleged nuisance — though it would devastate the U.S. economy —
because global warming is caused by global emissions that this Court has no power to enjoin.»
In heavy industy,
fossils fuels will always be required for lime and cement kilns, metal smelters, steel mills, foundries and metal casting plants, metal cutting and braising torches, all factories that make ceramics (e.g., bricks, tiles, china, glass, etc), all food
production, processing and distribution, space and water heating, cooking and baking, BBQ's, manufacture of porcelain - coated metals, harvesting of wood and lumber manufacture, isolation of essential oils by steam distillation for prepartion of fine fragrances flavors, etc
because the
fuels provide HIGH HEAT.
Because forecasting
fossil fuel production in the twenty - first century has several methodological problems, the paper begins with a discussion of these methodological issues prior to the discussion of the outlook for each
fossil fuel.
Total energy
production per capita resumed increasing after 2000 only
because of rapidly growing
fossil fuel production (which accounted for 98 per cent of the per capita increase for 2000 — 2005).
This simplistic model is not correct for the
production of corn - based ethanol
because fossil fuels are used in the growing of corn and the
production of ethanol, and these contribute to global warming gasses.
The nations of the world are taking on sulfate and particulate
production, and will likely substantially reduce this
production long before CO2
production is reduced (mainly
because it is possible with current technology to burn
fossil fuels with greatly reduced sulfate output, but it is not possible to burn
fossil fuels with greatly reduced CO2 output).