Because general relativity didn't explain quantum theory, it had to be provisional as well.
Gravitation expert Bernard Schutz of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany, says he thinks that the mission was worthwhile
because general relativity should be checked in a variety of ways.
Not exact matches
[17] Hawking, 46, notes that at the Big Bang moment «the density of the universe and the curvature of space - time would have been infinite,» yet «
because mathematics can not really handle infinite numbers,... the
general theory of
relativity... itself breaks down.»
Read http://www.express.co.uk/news/science-technology/455880/Stephen-Hawking-says-there-is-no-such-thing-as-black-holes-Einstein-spinning-in-his-grave Absence of Black Holes means Stephen Hawking has finally accepted that there are serious problems with both Newton's perspective of Gravity & Einstein's
General Theory of
Relativity because both require Black Holes at the center of the galaxies.
Einstein's
General Theory of
Relativity superceded Newton's Theory of Gravity
because of observations of the orbits of Mercury.
I also find it unacceptable scientifically
because if one is approaching it from our current understanding of
Relativity, the thing that corresponds to our awareness of the universe over an interval of time is not a simultaneity slab,
because in
General Relativity there is no such thing.
Physics, in particular, is noted for its ability to use inductive reasoning to posit universal laws such as Einstein's
General Relativity, making the claim that experiments and observations on or from earth allow us to generalise a theory into universal law, i.e. a law of physics that we believe must hold everywhere in the universe
because this is a law written into the fabric of the universe.
Abell 2744 is useful as an astronomical tool
because the universe obeys Albert Einstein's
general theory of
relativity.
That's
because, in
general relativity, the expansion of each local region of space depends on how much matter is within.
But
general relativity maintains that those black holes merged
because their mass indented the fabric of space and time (SN: 10/17/15, p. 16).
Physicists scrutinize the equivalence principle
because any violation could point to new forces of nature that might resolve a long - standing impasse between
general relativity and quantum theory.
The discovery immediately becomes a likely candidate for a Nobel Prize, and not just
because it ties a neat bow around decades of evidence supporting a major prediction of Einstein's 1915
general theory of
relativity.
This mystery is tantalizing
because it seems to involve a connection between quantum mechanics and gravity and could provide a clue to uniting
general relativity with quantum mechanics.
Einstein's theories also opened a rift in physics
because the rules of
general relativity (which describe gravity and the large - scale structure of the cosmos) seem incompatible with those of quantum physics (which govern the realm of the tiny).
One program, «Inside Einstein's Mind,» succeeded not only
because it dealt in a convincing way with the complexities of theoretical physics, but also
because it revealed a very human drama as Einstein raced to complete his
general theory of
relativity in 1915, even as the world seemed to be falling apart during World War I as was his marriage.
By the mid-1980s the new superstring theory had emerged as the hottest theoretical breakthrough since quantum mechanics, mainly
because it seemed to show a way that quantum mechanics itself could be merged with Einstein's
general relativity.
Einstein would later describe this thought experiment of the falling workman as «the happiest thought of my life,»
because it provided the necessary jump - start for his
general theory of
relativity.
He could believe in gravity waves and other unlikely predictions of
general relativity because math supported them.
This difference is dubbed the «gravitational red shift» (GRS) and is one of the trickiest predictions of
general relativity to measure
because the effect is so small.
Hawking's work was a tremendous conceptual advance
because it linked three previously disparate areas of physics:
general relativity, quantum theory and thermodynamics.
My friends in physics look at space - time purely from the perspective of real physics, yet the
general theory of
relativity describes space - time in terms of geometry,
because that's how Einstein looked at the problem.
General relativity: Einstein, 1915
General relativity was much more revolutionary than special
relativity,
because it ditched Newton's law of gravity in favor of curved spacetime.
They measured it just
because it was there, with no inkling that it would soon emerge as the sole experimental anchor of a revolutionary new conception of space and time — the
general theory of
relativity.
This testing is especially so in regions close to a black hole, according to Chen,
because the current evidence for Einstein's
general relativity — light bending by the sun, for example — mainly comes from regions where the gravitational field is very weak, or regions far away from a black hole.
Einstein was particularly pleased to be there
because of the role Brazilian scientists had played in verifying his theory of gravity, the
general theory of
relativity.
The second - largest contribution comes from the warping of space - time around the Sun
because of the star's own gravity, which is covered by Einstein's theory of
general relativity.
General relativity says it's impossible to send rockets through space at the speed of light,
because this would require infinite energy.
«In principle, these stars could test
general relativity,
because they get into a very strong gravitational field at the central black hole,» Ghez says.
That is
because for decades cosmologists have had trouble reconciling the classic notion of viscosity based on the laws of thermodynamics with Einstein's
general theory of
relativity.
General relativity plays an essential role
because its infinite phase space will prevent cosmic history being simply a repetitive sequence of returns to the same state.
Because it should be possible to survive the transition from our world to the black hole world, physicists and mathematicians have long wondered what that world would look like, and have turned to Einstein's equations of
general relativity to predict the world inside a black hole.
A failure in the predictions of
General Relativity «would have been excellent news,» he affirms, «
because finding deviations is a hint that there is more to be learned, and that would be very exciting.»
A 100 - year - old «cosmological constant» theory introduced by Albert Einstein in relation to his work on
general relativity and some other theories derived from this model remain as viable contenders
because they propose that dark energy is a constant in both space and time: Gravitational waves and light waves are affected in the same way by dark energy, and thus travel at the same rate through space.
The brightening occurs
because a second star (the «lens») physically crosses between your telescope and the source and magnifies the source light through
general relativity.