Not exact matches
Because scientists have evidence in the prehistoric record of
quakes that
large in the Texas - Oklahoma region, the USGS's new maps include a low - probability chance for that possibility.
Estimating magnitude for
larger quakes also takes more time,
because the rupture of the fault lasts perhaps several seconds longer — a significant chunk of time when it comes to EEW.
Their interest is more than purely academic,
because triggered tremors - if that is what they are - may warn that a really
large quake is on the way in the same place.
At the original trial, many witnesses described how their loved ones had been persuaded to stay indoors after De Bernardinis told a journalist, during a now infamous interview ahead of the commission's meeting, that the ongoing tremors were favorable
because they discharged energy and therefore made a
larger quake less likely.
That's
because the
larger surface - wave magnitudes record low - frequency energy, while Richter and coda magnitudes are based on high - frequency seismic waves that people usually feel during real
quakes.
But
because a fault system can only release as much energy as is built up by grinding tectonic plates, increasing the frequency of
large events means there will be less energy to fuel smaller
quakes.
Because the faults that break during the earthquake are so deep, the seismic wave energy they radiate spreads over a much
larger area than in a shallow
quake.
Detecting glacialquakes is important
because glaciers appear to accelerate after
large calving events.2 The frequency of glacialquakes — which has been rising since the late 1990s — has increased particularly since 2002.3 In fact, the number of
quakes in 2005 was twice that of 2001.1 In late summer of 2005, glacial seismic activity was almost five times greater than in the winter months — most likely owing to seasonal changes in temperature.1, 3