Sentences with phrase «because of trading costs»

Not exact matches

Revenues rose just 1 % because of a decline in trading, but because costs fell and expense for bad loans improved, BofA's net income jumped 12 %.

«We're focusing on the companies that regardless of the type of inflation — whether it's commodities or trade or something else — can pass on those costs because they have some sort of structural advantage,» said Eric Marshall, a portfolio manager at Dallas - based Hodges Capital.

He thinks that Amazon's shares are worth significantly more than where they are trading now because he expects the company's higher - margin web services business to grow faster than its retail segment, more than making up for the cost of expanding into new businesses to lure more Prime members, he said.

Our cost of a single trade at BlackRock is down 80 % because much of the trading process is done electronically now.

In fact, the higher costs of trading might be a good thing, because now investors really know what they're getting into.

Only with bonds it's even harder to create a diversified portfolio using individual bonds on your own unless you (a) have a large amount of capital (typically bonds are sold in lots of $ 10,000 or $ 100,000) and (b) know how to trade bonds on the open market (transaction costs can be larger for bonds than stocks because of the spreads and lack of liquidity).

Most of the cost you'll never be able to quantify because you won't be able to tell if you're getting a good deal on your trade or not if you're not an expert.

This has been described as «leveraging» because every unit of the final product — say, every car — incorporates a great deal of trade in the intermediate products and any reduction in costs imposed on trade can have cascading effects.

He also said he wants South Korea to pay the cost of the U.S. THAAD anti-missile defense system, which he estimated at $ 1 billion, and intends to renegotiate or terminate a U.S. free trade pact with South Korea because of a deep trade deficit with Seoul.

The United States is a net importer of Chinese capital, for example, because it must finance its trade deficit with China, and its trade deficit with China is a consequence not of capital flows that may distort trade but rather because of high manufacturing costs in the United States, with expensive labor almost always fingered as the main culprit.

Peter Brandt, a CTA since 1976, summed it up nicely in regards to commodities trading below costs... «But, you might say, this kind of drop is impossible because producers must make money.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

«The trend of companies shifting to Vietnam from China will likely accelerate for at least two to three years, largely because of China's higher labor costs,» said Lee Jung Soon, who leads a business - incubation team of the Korea Trade - Investment Promotion Agency in Ho Chi Minh City.

Earlier this month Ms Watkins warned that CCA's June - half earnings were expected to fall 15 per cent because the bottler had been unable to recover higher costs in Australia as a result of aggressive pricing in supermarkets and weaker sales in the higher - margin route trade.

As great as these guys could be for the Bulls, a trade for any of them is extremely unlikely because it could cost Chicago a major contributor, Taj Gibson, plus a first - round pick.

When Garoppolo was traded to San Francisco, it cost the 49ers just a second - round pick because the New England Patriots were running out of time to get compensation.

Are you a Pirates fan wondering when the cycle of acquiring prospects to be developed into players who will be traded for more prospects simply because veterans cost money is going to end?

Labour is facing a funding problems because of the changes to trade union political levy rules in the trade union bill which are expected cost the party a whopping # 6m a year.

And Nigel Farage claimed Britain doesn't need trade deals with the EU, because the cost of tariffs would be smaller than the cost of membership fees

The New York Insurance Association, a trade group that represents property and casualty insurance industry, opposed Cahill's bill because it would «needlessly increase mandatory minimum limits of liability and fails to preserve the legal distinction between using a vehicle for personal uses and for ride - sharing services, which will result in greatly increased costs for all New York auto insurance consumers.»

«If we continue to have to trade key readiness measures like spare parts and maintenance and training hours away because the cost of energy has increased, that ultimately erodes our readiness as well as our combat capability, making us less ready to deploy and do our nation's bidding.»

Over the next several years, increasing pension costs in particular will require increasingly difficult trade - offs, in part because of factors outside of OUSD's control.

From what I've heard from textbook publishers, digital editions are NOT going to be cheaper than print counterparts (unlike with trade books, for example) because the high cost of the textbook is supposedly in the paying of the authors.

Print - on - Demand is attractive because it doesn't require any up - front investment in inventory, but you trade off the lower unit cost of books produced in larger quantities for that convenience.

Members of the military are assured of an income because the US government is not the same as a business, which might suddenly cease to trade or introduce cost - cutting measures that result in redundancies.

Despite the relatively high commission cost, I have been using Scottrade for years and it's my primary stock broker, not only because of its excellent customer service, but also that I can actually trade with Scottrade for free.

I'll come up with some better guidelines next week but the short answer is that for most people, it is not worthwhile to switch to RBC unless you have total assets of $ 100k (by household) because the higher trading costs ($ 29 if your assets are less than $ 100k) will negate the rebate.

You should expect to slightly underperform these indexes because of fund expenses and trading costs, and that's not a bad trade - off compared to the alternatives.

Because all NextShares trading prices are directly linked to NAV, buyers and sellers of NextShares always know exactly what they pay in trading costs.

By contrast, ETF investors typically can not measure their trading costs because they don't have access to a reliable measure of underlying fund value at the time of trade execution.

I used to pay $ 4.95 per trade at Questrade, but I have since moved to another broker because of a cost advantage provided by an affiliated company with my employer.

And because of their active nature they tend to have greater trading costs, which can also result in taxable capital gains.

Low - cost index funds (or exchange traded funds) give investors a big leg up against the vast majority of actively managed funds that charge more than 2 % of assets annually because most of the active funds fail to earn back the fees they charge.

Liquidity providers in option markets prefer to hedge mostly with other options, hedging residual greeks with other assets such as the underlying, volatility, time, interest rates, etc because trading costs are lower since the two offsetting options hedge most of each other out, requiring less trading in the other assets.

Assuming active investing expenses are 2 % (some may be more, some may be less, but certainly none will be less than the passive investing expenses because of management fees and higher trading costs etc), then the active group would have made 10 % - 2 % = 8 % on average.

Because ETFs attract a lot of traders, the expense ratio is small in comparison to cost of trading.

When using this method, you can not move your stop loss to true break even, because you can't lock in a set amount of pips (say 2 or 3) to cover your trading costs.

He stated that an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 meets his needs for small cap exposure because the index is effective, the ETF he chose for S&P 600 exposure is low cost, and the modularity, or building - block nature, of the three headline S&P indices are precise tools to help him allocate to his size views.

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

Also, because of trading fees, buying and selling individual stocks is not free either, even if you use a low - cost self - service brokerage account.

ETFs are a relatively recent development and have been slowly taking over much of the mutual fund business because they are highly liquid (can usually be traded almost instantly), don't have minimum buy - in amounts like many mutual funds, and often have lower costs (although not always).

This has the effect of skewing the average cost of the shares down because more are bought when the stock is trading lower.

Illiquid assets that are similar to a liquid asset usually yield more, because the cost of trading is much higher, and the possibility of being trapped is higher also.

By purchasing a block of 100 put contracts at a $ 90 strike price, you're capping your losses at 10 % per share for the entire duration of the contract (minus the cost of the contracts) because you can sell your existing shares for $ 90, even if the stock is trading at $ 50.

Because the Basket instruments and Creation Unit transaction fees that apply each business day are disclosed prior to the beginning of trading, NextShares market makers know each day the primary costs of entering into Creation Unit transactions on that day and the instruments to be paid or received in Creation Unit transactions.

Because trading prices are directly linked to NAV, buyers and sellers of NextShares know exactly what they pay in trading costs and can control their trading costs by using limit orders.

I like the lower costs of the ETFs, but I have refrained from ETFs because I'm concerned that the share values may not always be aligned with the value of the underlying assets (because the ETFs can be traded like stocks all day long).

And because you're collecting immediate income when you open the trade, you're lowering your cost basis on the shares you're buying, which means this strategy is actually safer than purchasing shares of the underlying stock outright.

Because of our size and institutional access, we are also able to trade free of cost, and we only use products free from commissions and other hidden fees.

Meanwhile, active ETFs are essentially the same as actively traded funds, except with all the benefits of ETFs, including: greater tax efficiency (i.e. lower turnover), lower cost, and greater liquidity because they are traded like stocks throughout the day.