Because oral reading fluency has been shown to be a reliable indicator of overall reading performance, national norms for reading fluency can provide a valuable tool for making key decisions about students.
In fact, many people «heard» Luther's pamphlets read by someone else, both because some of the listeners were not literate and
because oral reading was still a significant public act.
Not exact matches
Because it is an
oral thermometer, it is not the most accurate and can take a while to
read your baby's temperature.
I was using them,
because I
read a lot of positive things about spraying Magnesium on your skin is superior to
oral ingestion.
Answer 1: A,
oral questions Answer 2: A,
because young / struggling readers often
read only the parts of the text that help them answer the questions.
Because we were personally and painfully aware of the problems of using group assessments, especially with kindergartners and first graders, and because we wanted assessments that would be credible with the teachers in these schools, we were committed to one - on - one assessments, oral reading samples, and retellings — all practices we knew would appeal to te
Because we were personally and painfully aware of the problems of using group assessments, especially with kindergartners and first graders, and
because we wanted assessments that would be credible with the teachers in these schools, we were committed to one - on - one assessments, oral reading samples, and retellings — all practices we knew would appeal to te
because we wanted assessments that would be credible with the teachers in these schools, we were committed to one - on - one assessments,
oral reading samples, and retellings — all practices we knew would appeal to teachers.
Because students rehearse with the goal of giving an expressive
oral performance, this form of repeated
reading improves both word recognition automaticity and
reading prosody, which are critical components of fluency.
Because all Level 7 codes were frequently coded, and because multiple Level 7 codes were almost always coded during a 5 - minute segment, a decision was made to consider the incidence of active (reading, writing, manipulation) and passive (reading turn - taking, oral turn - taking, and listening) events out of the total number of Level 7 codes re
Because all Level 7 codes were frequently coded, and
because multiple Level 7 codes were almost always coded during a 5 - minute segment, a decision was made to consider the incidence of active (reading, writing, manipulation) and passive (reading turn - taking, oral turn - taking, and listening) events out of the total number of Level 7 codes re
because multiple Level 7 codes were almost always coded during a 5 - minute segment, a decision was made to consider the incidence of active (
reading, writing, manipulation) and passive (
reading turn - taking,
oral turn - taking, and listening) events out of the total number of Level 7 codes recorded.
If someone assigned students to the Wilson phonics program
because of an
oral reading fluency test alone, I'd have concerns.
Because dogs don't criticize
oral reading errors, some schools and libraries welcome «reader» dogs to help children develop confidence with their
reading skills.
On the
oral IRP appeal it was argued that the ASD result was not reliable owing to the fact that the ASD used by the officer might not have been working properly
because: (a) the ASD had not been calibrated in accordance with recognized guidelines (within the required 28 days previous to its use); and (b) a properly working ASD could not have possibly had 3 test in a row that
read «NO GO» (in that if insufficient air was produced on the 3rd test it should have
read «VOID» and not «NO GO»).
It's a shame,
because I, for one, would have been interested to
read his take on the appellate briefing and
oral argument process in this one.
Upon first
read, the SCOTUS
oral argument transcript in Kimbrough is a bit less frustrating
because Kimbrough's lawyer did a nice job stressing that Derrick Kimbrough's 15 - year sentence seems in harmony with the sentencing purposes Congress set forth in 3553 (a)(2).