Sentences with phrase «because trade matters»

Not exact matches

The farm is operated by the Gooddoctor Pharmaceutical Group of Chengdu, Sichuan, which confirmed the validity of the government document but could not answer the Post's queries because the matter involved trade secrets.

These names are viewed as non-tariff barriers, which matter because they are the last significant friction in international trade, which the Transatlantic Investment Partnership treaty aims to lower.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sent a subpoena on Dec. 6 to both Bitfinex, a cryptocurrency exchange, and Tether, a company that issues a virtual currency, the person said, wishing to remain anonymous because the matter is private.

Although I personally trade only stocks and ETFs, I know that binary options trading has become extremely popular with traders in recent years because of the low amount of starting capital required, the ability to only determine whether a trade will go up or down, and the instant gratification of knowing whether or not your binary option trade is a winner within a matter of minutes.

Everything about this trade is fascinating, but the inclusion of the Nets pick adds another layer of intrigue, particularly because it went from being untouchable to gone in a matter of minutes.

That's because none of them ended up mattering much at all outside of being lottery tickets (Rubby De La Rosa and Allen Webster, both eventually traded for Wade Miley) or a way to make sure that the math checked out and Boston was going to be able to get under the luxury tax.

I am dismayed, appalled and yet, at the same time, somewhat interested in a consumer sense because the fact of the matter is that my 6 - year - old daughter would probably trade her pet fish for Fantastic Fingernails.

So instead it has argued that the report doesn't really matter because it does not take into account its preferred option, which is a bespoke trade deal.

(And the third party matters to Britain, too, because it will react like this: «If you can't stop our generous trade agreement being exploited by EU traders, we'll need to repeal it.»)

SA: So because there's a trade - off, you're saying, it doesn't matter whether trees are neutral?

This isn't about judging, it's an open platform, and what you'll find is that no matter who you are, the housewife who just hasn't been complimented or paid attention to in ages, the woman who just really likes being with married men because that's what she wants, or you're with someone you don't want to marry, maybe you want to trade up; if you relate, then you're going to find someone compatible.

(Learnt the hard way and wised up to that one line) simply because if you mess up on every trade you enter it doesn't matter how much you are risking.

These are the types of questions you should ask yourself about any trading system or education you are considering, because these are ones that matter.

I addition to being patient, another virtue of successful traders is accepting you will miss out a few good trades because it did not match 100 % your entry rules, no matter what.

So it becomes very important in futures options trading to pay attention to what's going on with the underlying futures contract, because the option's movements are always going to be based on this, no matter how strange they may behave sometimes.

I am not sure specifically about what you are asking and would like to hear on this myself but I don't believe there is any disadvantage per se because I know there are programs that do dividend reinvestment and that results in fractional ownership of a share until it becomes a full share and while only your «whole» shares are «traded» when it comes to actual worth, your fractional count too, so I assume from that if you had «whole» shares no matter what the amount, you'd be proportionally invested as anyone owning more shares, just to a lesser extent.

This is because there is no system in binary options trading, or in any other trade for that matter that is ideal; one where you will never make losses.

If you attempt to trade chop, you are gambling and in my opinion, you have worse than a random chance of profiting because the market will move a little bit in your favour and then reverse against you, no matter if you're trading long or short.

I'm not only saying this because I teach price action trading, but also because you really do need to know how to read the raw price action of a market, no matter what trading method you eventually end up using.

Of course, this largely depends on your ability to find and enter high - probability Forex trades, because if you over-trade and enter the market on whims, you aren't going to last very long in the markets, no matter what your exit strategy is.

Being patient while trading with price action goes something like this: you see what looks like a decent pin bar formation but it is going against a rather strong trend, because you know that this setup has a much lower probability of working out than a pin bar setup with a strongly trending market, you sit on your hands and pass it up, don't think anymore about it, even if it works out it does not matter because you just exercised patience, and you will be rewarded for it the more you use it.

Also, if you really understand and believe this, you should not have any desire to over-leverage your trades... because you know that it's the series of trades over time that matters, not any one in particular.

Why this matters for investors is because it represents a shift in trading strategies — certainly for options traders — that will no doubt take time to adjust to.

If we're in this for the long - run (and I believe the average investor should be, because we have no business dabbling in short - term trading), then the obvious thing for us to do is to pick the best - performing long - run asset — Stocks — no matter how it's doing «right now.»

However, it is not uncommon for a professional trader to lose a higher percentage of trades than he or she wins, but it does not matter because they keep their losers small and they are totally fine with swallowing losses as they wait for a winner to hit.

The reason why it's not good is because it simply doesn't matter if you win on the next trade, what matters is if you are being disciplined and only trading when your edge is present and always controlling your risk.

This matters because «once management fees are factored in, the average actively managed fund loses to passive, lower - fee mutual funds and exchange - traded funds that track broad indexes» [3].

But as an investor, high - frequency trading doesn't matter because you're focused on the boring work of buying good things and owning them for a long time.»

That might seem a bit strange, but the fact of the matter is that once you know exactly what you are looking for in the markets because you have truly mastered your trading edge, there is simply no value in spending vast amounts of time analyzing your charts.

It isn't people selling because they know something you don't, it's program trading that will probably run its course in a matter of minutes.

You made money on the trade and you at least doubled your risk, this is all that should matter because there will always be tomorrow and there will always be excellent opportunities in the Forex market.

It is also a matter of simple fairness, because the cap - and - trade system will create jobs, improve livelihoods, and strengthen futures across our country.

Yields continue to rise faster than population, weather continues to matter less and less because of technology and trade (in the 1690s, when it was cheaper to move people than food, 15 % of France's population starved because of a failed harvest that today would register as a small price blip), and famine continues to reflect more and more political, not ecological causes.

perhaps people don't believe in AGW because leading AGW scientists have been caught cooking their data... and then lying about cooking their data... and then taking as gospel data from trade publications but pretending it's from peer - reviewed scientific journals... and then, after having been caught out on it all, pretending that it doesn't matter anyway because it's just true, dammit, and stop questioning it!

Matters of policy, like «we should adopt a cap - and - trade system», are on a much more equal playing field — because they're opinions, not facts.

Lawyers of the future who will still be practicing law as we think of it today, meaning trading time for dollars, will be doing so because they are experts with deep subject matter knowledge and experience applying that knowledge to assist a specific group of clients.

Leon Bass, a director and managing attorney at Southern California Edison Co., said he has sent numerous matters to LTL involving misappropriated trade secrets, trademark disputes and other IP - related work, partly because the firm is a model «diversity business enterprise.»

As Tiffany C. Li pointed out in Slate, the semantic point matters because a data breach could expose Facebook to legal action from state governments and the Federal Trade Commission, including fines and other remedies.

The reason for this is because all trades on the Bittrex exchange (and most exchanges for that matter) are done in terms of one of these 3 coins.

That's in line with where advisers expected the shares to trade, people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information wasn't public, said before the listing.

My biggest criticism is however reserved for CFTC because, although there is little that can be done about some incompetents putting up a website, CFTC can, should and must provide an alternative and allow, in my view as a matter of urgency, professional exchanges such as GDAX and Gemini and others, to provide margin and future trading.

This is the mentality of a militant trade union (of which I was a member many years ago, so I know of what I speak) that protects its members no matter what they do vis a vis law - breaking and / or despicable behaviour etc. «Blood is thicker than water», as the old saying goes, but in this case it should not be, because the water of the public interest is what nurtures a vocation's growth, not the bad - blood work of the realturds.

It doesn't matter because all the Real Estate Councils except B C have made «mere posting» a trading services activity which means you have to be a licensed Managing Broker in each Province to get the data sheets so your individual agent can do a «Mere Posting.»