Sentences with phrase «benefit pension plan as»

A: A Defined Benefit Pension Plan as Ruth is describing provides for a lifetime monthly income.

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Corey Rosen, executive director at the National Center for Employee Ownership, in Oakland, Calif., suggests reminding employees that a stock - option grant rarely replaces more traditional benefits such as a pension plan and therefore should be viewed as a bonus — one that in some cases may never be worth a dime.

Financial institutions such as Nomura Securities Co, SBI Securities Co, the Bank of Tokyo - Mitsubishi UFJ, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp now offer private pension plans and could benefit from a significant expansion in this market.

That's pretty much what the federal government has been doing since 2006, with tweaks such as abolishing mandatory retirement, a graduated rise in the eligibility age for OAS benefits and new tax - sheltered savings vehicles in tax - free savings accounts and pooled registered pension plans.

The NIA's study found that people with defined - benefit plans, such as traditional pensions, retire on average 1.3 years earlier than those with defined - contribution plans, such as 401 (k) s.

He began buying property both as a hobby and because, as a recent immigrant, he couldn't rely on Old Age Security or Canada Pension Plan benefits.

• 35 % of retirees have less than $ 1,000 in savings and investments that could be used for retirement, not counting their primary residence or defined benefits plans such as traditional pensions; 53 % have less than $ 25,000.

While Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement were designed to provide a basic minimum amount to Canadian seniors, the new Canada and Quebec Pension Plans were contributory social insurance programs established to provide basic death, survivor and disability benefits as well as retirement coverage.

In short, because they pool longevity risk, can offer a well - diversified portfolio with longer - term investments, and are professionally managed, public pension funds deliver the same level of benefits as DC plans at only 46 percent of the cost.15 Any funds invested with the state pension fund would be kept in a separate investment pool from public sector funds.

(a) Schedule 2.7 (a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a list setting forth each employee benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligatplan, program, policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligatplan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligatPlan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligatPlan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligation.

Quite by chance, a supplier told Xu about IBEW and when he learned that unionized electricians were earning almost three times as much as he was — with benefits, a generous pension plan and an Employment Insurance top - up when they were between jobs, he was anxious to join.

«These findings raise serious questions about the policy needs for future pensionless cohorts, such as the adequacy of benefits from Old Age Security, the Guaranteed Income Supplement, and the Quebec and Canada pension plans,» the report states.

Other company benefits, such as a 401 (k) or pension plan, help you build retirement security over time.

«The panoply of public policies offering «voluntary» options for saving - such as RRSPs, TFSAs, group RPPs, and the most recent Pool Registration Pension Plans - have demonstrated their inadequacy to address the shortcomings in declining workplace pensions and a Canada Pension Plan with limited benefits,» the study concludes.

Canadian retirees can receive government support through the Old Age Security (OAS) pensions as well as through the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), yet 48 % of those surveyed did not know with a high degree of confidence how much of their current income will be replaced by their CPP or OAS benefits.

DC investment forum On October 5 and 6, Look for MFS» regional DC team members at the Benefits Canada DC Investment Forum in Toronto as they join senior representatives from Canada's largest DC pension plans, consultants and leading providers in discussing how plan sponsors and the DC pension industry can help plan members optimize their outcomes.

There are a limited number of employer - sponsored defined benefit plans (pensions) available as it is, said Henry Ford, principal and senior advisor for LifeSteps Financial, a registered investment advisory firm.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is describing an expanded Canada Pension Plan as a «payroll tax,» but says he can see how such a move would benefit Canadians over the long term.

While employers would be required to pay one half of the cost of the modest premium increase required to finance an enhanced CPP, companies which sponsor defined benefit pension plans would not face additional costs since the great majority of these plans are fully integrated, meaning that they would pay out less as CPP benefits were increased.

And for defined benefit plan sponsors, the pension plan expense is as volatile as ever.

Usually this means either a defined contribution plan [such as a 401 (k) or 403 (b) plan] or a defined benefit plan (a traditional fixed «pension» that a government employee might receive).

An overwhelming majority of ESOP companies have other retirement and / or savings plans, such as defined benefit pension plans or 401 (k) plans, to supplement their ESOP.

Likewise, dividing qualified plans such as 401 (k) s, Defined Benefit plans, or pension plans requires a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO).

Settlements, as they occur, are covered in complete detail with pertinent information on wage adjustments, paid holidays, vacations with pay, shift premiums, medical benefits, dental plans, weekly indemnity, life insurance, pension plans, cost - of - living allowances and rates of pay.

The government has said the expanded Canada Pension Plan (CPP) will help smaller firms compete with larger counterparts because there won't be as big a gap when it comes to pension benefits, saidPension Plan (CPP) will help smaller firms compete with larger counterparts because there won't be as big a gap when it comes to pension benefits, saidpension benefits, said Kelly.

The challenges are to pay down a $ 272,000 mortgage with a 30 - year amortization which costs her $ 1,091 per month, to get more income from her $ 580,609 of financial assets, and to make the most of Canada Pension Plan benefits which could start to flow as early as her age 60 next year.

Net investment income does not include tax - exempt interest from municipal bonds (or funds); withdrawals from a retirement plan such as a traditional IRA, Roth IRA, or 401 (k); and payouts from traditional defined benefit pension plans or annuities that are part of retirement plans.

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Case and Deaton speculate that the shift from defined - benefit pension plans in the U.S. to defined - contribution plans (such as the 401 (k)-RRB- may have caused the upward shift in mortality rates.

The party plans to make up the money by restricting tax relief on pension contributions to the basic rate, taxing capital gains at marginal income tax rates, allowing for indexation and retirement relief, tackling stamp duty land tax avoidance and corporation tax avoidance and by subjecting benefits in kind to national insurance contributions as well as income tax and applying national insurance to multiple jobs.

Astorino will also propose that new lawmakers be required to join a «defined contribution plan,» as opposed to the current «defined benefit plan,» for future pension benefits, a move that will reduce the state's long - term pension costs.

Thousands will lose benefits as harsher medical approved Tens of thousands of claimants facing losing their benefit on review, or on being transferred from incapacity benefit, as plans to make the employment and support allowance (ESA) medical much harder to pass are approved by the secretary of state for work and pensions, Yvette Cooper.

Many of the welfare reforms and reductions are likely to prove temporary as Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is developing plans for a radical «universal credit» which will replace all out - of - work benefits over the next decade.

The party is planning to campaign against the CGT cuts in the coming weeks to apply more pressure on the chancellor following Iain Duncan Smith's shock resignation as work and pensions secretary, when he branded Osborne's budget «deeply unfair», triggering the scrapping of the disability benefit cuts.

Unions were furious, using a pre planned rally to express their anger, saying the new benefit tier will reduce pensions by as much 40 % for future state workers.

Frank Field is one of these people who lots of people say is great until he is actually given any power, he manages both to agitate Labour MPs favourable towards welfare by coming out with solutions to time limit benefits and add workfare requirements, equally he is constantly saying that JSA rates are far too low as well as demanding pensions at high rates for all, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both came to the conclusion that his proposals on the State Pension would have been hugely expensive - his pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling in the welfare Pension would have been hugely expensive - his pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling in the welfare pension plans could not all be funded by savings on the unemployed and would probably lead to a huge swelling in the welfare budget.

In addition, often there are no performance evaluations; often no pension plans and other employment benefits (such as health insurance) offered to other workers at the same institution; or procedures for resolving problems.

The RESAVER pension plan will be contribution - rather than benefit - based, meaning that researchers will know how much they put in but not how much they'll get, as they would with many other pension plans in Europe.

The EC has been working with a consortium of employers to put in place arrangements that will allow researchers to contribute to a savings plan and preserve pension benefits as they move around Europe.

After a little investigating, I discovered that these types of companies were hungry for scientists and offered many nice benefits, such as 40 - to 50 - hour weeks, higher salaries, paid vacations, and medical, dental, and pension plans.

It turns out that this is the natural result of the most common type of teacher pension plan (known as final average salary (FAS) defined benefit plans).

The plan was praised by educators as the first step toward creation of a national system allowing transfers of pension benefits.

This means that contributions include both the «normal cost» of pension liabilities accruing to current employees and the legacy costs of amortizing unfunded liabilities accrued previously (due to a variety of reasons, including the original pay - as - you go nature of most plans, as well as unfunded benefit enhancements over the years).

As it will be clear later, when it comes to pension plans, retirement plan costs do not always translate into retirement plan benefits, and the Chester Charter School is offering a pretty good retirement plan.

Nationally, 9 out of 10 teachers participate in a «defined benefit» pension plan, which guarantees a set monthly payment as long as a retiree lives.

But fat pension and health care benefits make perfect sense to union leaders — especially when the union runs the health care insurance plan, as is the case in Milwaukee.

As I write in a piece for RealClearEducation, «When advocates for traditional defined - benefit pensions say things like, «pension plans would be in better financial shape if states made their required contributions,» that's true, but only half the story.

Women are more likely to spend time out of the workforce than men, and defined - benefit pension plans tend to punish teachers who fail to meet specific targets, such as 30 years of service.

As those who have followed the school battles in Wisconsin and Indiana know well, school employees enjoy generously funded health - care benefits and handsome defined benefit pension plans that are driving many state and local governments to the edge of bankruptcy.