I grew up in a church environment where accepting
the bible as the absolute truth was the only option.
Not exact matches
The
bible is a historical record of many things... but quoting passages that represent a great variety of differing views
as if each one is some sort of proof of
absolute self evident and unquestionable
truth not going to convince.
It's not a negation of
truth or
absolute truth, it's just a recognition that we might be
as confused over things
as our kin in the faith who chained up
Bibles, burned the bones of reformers, tossed bombs into the basements of black churches and burned crosses on the front yards of black people, who ignore the plight of the homeless and the poor while we struggle to decide between the 36 and 72 inch plasma screen tv.
Respectfully, I would remind once again, that claiming
bible =
absolute fact or * concrete *
truth, is
as you know....
As it is stated in book of Mithra ism, Christianity,
bible addressed to hindu Pharisees, criminal secular's, YOU DECORATE TOMB»S OF YOU CLAIMED ANCESTORS AND DENY
TRUTH ABSOLUTE,
TRUTH IS THE ROCK, WHO EVER WILL FALL ON IT, WILL DIE AND WHOM EVER IT WILL FALL ON, WILL DIE.
@Mass Debater «I have read many works that study the history of the Jewish people and their culture
as found apart from biblical sources, I have yet to find one that did not include supposition about the veracity of it's own work, with none claiming
absolute truth as to who the authors of the
bible or who the historical figure of Moses could have been.»