After twenty - five years, the translators wish again to record their debt to Eliza Hall Kendrick, formerly Professor of
Biblical History at Wellesley College, for her criticism and her help in the attempt to avoid «translation English.»
Not exact matches
Never - the-less, I am fascinated by
biblical scholarship, the
history of the early church, and
at any rate think people should have the correct facts about what was written and what the original authors meant it to mean.
And to say that
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who
at the beginning of human
history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
At all periods of
Biblical history and in diverse strata of the
Biblical materials we find the affirmation that what characterizes Yahweh in disfunction from the objects of men's worship which are mere vanity is his ability to hear the cry of the oppressed and to save him from his oppressor.
In the regular meetings of a circle of friends
at Heidelberg, after almost ten years of discussions, we finally arrived
at the conclusion that even God's revelation takes place in
history and that precisely the
biblical writings suggest this solution of the key problem of fundamental theology.
The
biblical teaching, after all, was not aimed
at one or another of the various theories developed in the
history of modern science but
at the cosmological understandings of origins found among surrounding peoples.
Using a broad sweep of
biblical history from Genesis to Revelation, Dr. Streett shows that the concept of the Kingdom of God on earth was
at the center of the hopes and dreams of Israel, and when John the Baptist and Jesus carried out their ministries, they were announcing the arrival and inauguration of this Kingdom in the person and work of Jesus Christ.
The very arrangement of the
biblical books in the Hebrew canon of scripture presupposes this definition of prophetism.1 Between the first division of the Law and the third division of the Writings, the central category of the Prophets embraces not only the books of the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve prophets from Hosea to Malachi (all together termed «Latter Prophets») but also the historical writings of Joshua, Judges, and the books of Samuel and Kings («Former Prophets») In this way the Hebrew Bible formally and appropriately acknowledges that prophetism is more than the prophet and his work, that it is also a way of looking
at, understanding, and interpreting
history.
Accepting the
biblical understanding of love as central to any human concept of the divine is
at the heart of Williams» enterprise, directly challenging the Augustinian formulation as a corruption of this.23 Love is «spirit taking form in
history.»
With a number of fellow pastors who became lifelong friends, Rauschenbusch studied, read, talked, debated and plumbed the new social theories of the day, especially those of the non-Marxist socialists whom John C. Cort has recently traced in Christian Socialism (Orbis, 1988) The pastors wove these theories together with
biblical themes to form» «Christian Sociology,» a hermeneutic of social
history that allowed them to see the power of God's kingdom being actualized through the democratization of the economic system (see James T. Johnson, editor, The Bible in American Law, Politics and Rhetoric [Scholars Press, 1985]-RRB- They pledged themselves to new efforts to make the spirit of Christianity the core of social renewal
at a time when agricultural - village life was breaking down and urban - cosmopolitan patterns were not yet fully formed.
Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and
history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject
at hand.Theologians and
biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of
biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..
Joseph Fitzmyer is in the Department of
Biblical Studies, Catholic University Washington, D.C. Norman Golb is Rosenberger Professor of Jewish
History and civilization
at the University of Chicago.
The average modern American has far more
biblical knowledge than they would have
at any point in
history.
(Ibid., «
Biblical Leadership,» pp. 124 - 133, «In the Midst of
History,» p. 78 ff.;
At the Turning, op.
The
biblical history is meaningful because it is related
at every point to the fundamental reality which lies behind all
history and all human experience, which is, the living God in His Kingdom; and because it moves towards a climax in which the Kingdom of God came upon men with conclusive effect.
The
biblical focus on
history as the locus of redemption, as we shall see in the next chapter, seems
at first sight to lessen the significance of the natural world.
The former camp were highly concerned with packing as much theological and
biblical knowledge into each song as possible, while the latter adopted the strategy of reaching hip - hop culture by fitting into it, and there's more great Christian - focused hip - hop being made, which will appeal to more fans, than
at any point in the genre's
history.
We need not recall here the
history of what led up to the declaration of Humani Generis (which is doctrinal in character, even if it does not constitute a dogmatic definition), starting with the pronouncement of the local synod
at Cologne in 1860 rejecting evolution in any form, the censure passed on the works of theologians favourable to evolution, such as M. D. Leroy (1895) and P. Zahm (1899), the decree of the
Biblical Commission in 1909, the tacit toleration of works favourable to evolution by theologians such as Ruschkamp (1935), Messenger (1931), Perier (1938), down to Pius XII's Allocution to the Papal Academy of Sciences in 1941.
So even in the case of the 10 Commandments, all
biblical «laws» are specific to a time and place and people, and they have a
history behind how these laws were developed so that those people living in that time
at that place could maintain peace and stability.
There is
biblical history, theology, archaeology, «criticism,» and hermeneutics (what happens to the Bible
at the modern end of the sausage grinder).
Neither Alt nor Albright was prepared to take the
biblical account of Israel's origins and early
history entirely
at face value, yet both saw it as a rich source of historical information.
This isn't Tom Wright writing the definitive
history of Israel, but a New York Times chart - topper with 50 times Wright's global influence, choosing to put an ancient
biblical story
at the heart of the cultural zeitgeist.
But it is safe to hold,
at least in a loose sense, that
biblical consciousness is teleological in that it posits symbolically a final significance to events in nature and
history.
And from the
biblical perspective
at least, the meaning of
history is found only in our pursuit of this promise.
The moment has been richly prepared for by
at least two generations of
biblical scholars who have been attentive to the literary properties of everything from the parables to the Davidic court
history.
To the already impressive catalogue of their primacy we must add that the Hebrews were also the first to develop a philosophy of
history; and when
at length this area of speculation was taken up seriously by Western thinkers, it was in direct succession to and dependence upon
Biblical accomplishments.
American Catholic
history may not be so booming a discipline as
biblical studies or medical ethics, but even the most cursory survey of the American Catholic Studies Newsletter (published by the Cushwa Center for the study of American Catholicism
at the University of Notre Dame, itself an institutional expression of the growth of the field) reveals an extraordinary breadth of research, ranging from classic institutional
histories and biographies of key figures to the new social
history, with its emphases on patterns of community, spirituality, family life, and education.
Thus, when teachers of world religions are needed
at many undergraduate colleges, they usually appoint either philosophers of religion, historians,
biblical scholars, or theologians who happen to have personal interests and perhaps had taken two or three courses in the
history of religions or comparative religion.
Nevertheless, the substance of
biblical faith allows us to say,
at the very least, the following: without a trust in the promise of a meaningful and unimaginably fulfilling future, the move into
history would be intolerable.
These are rather totally confusing and challenging warning signals to the
Biblical based foundations of the U.S. Dr. Graham felt some divine leading to stand firm with Gov. Romney
at this critically challenging time of the U.S.
history.
By adding together the life spans of the
Biblical patriarchs, they pegged the planet's age
at just under 6,000 years — a figure that stood virtually unchallenged until an 18th - century Scotsman named James Hutton began using deductive scientific logic to analyze the natural
history of rocks.
Here is a meticulous American milieu where obstinate men with crazy facial hair hurl insults
at one another in a baroque compendium of Twainian whimsy, Shakespearean oratory,
Biblical commandment and the florid spin doctoring of the day, including the single greatest use of the word «nincompoop» in cinema
history.
All the pieces are there, especially in the film's subject — the steely Elizabeth Sloane (Jessica Chastain), a pill - popping master manipulator who is always
at the ready with a perfect quip,
biblical verse or
history lesson for the moment.