This, and not the supernatural per se, is the essence of
the Biblical doctrine of the Spirit.
[4] Lagrand Fr Lucien MEP
The Biblical Doctrine of Virginity Chapman 1963 pp 92 - 3.
But
the biblical doctrine of God does not remain with man abased before omnipotence.
Christian theology needs to have a special treatise on revelation if for no other reason than to emphasize the indispensable
biblical doctrine of the prevenience of God's promissory vision for our lives and the world.
First he emphasized that man's self - transcendence in his spiritual nature is
the biblical doctrine of the «image of God.»
In John Baillie's widely acclaimed modern classic, And the Life Everlasting,
the biblical doctrine of the resurrection has almost moved out of sight, being replaced by an emphasis on eternal life as a quality of life which transcends death.
This clearly contradicts
the biblical doctrine of the forgiveness of sins by grace through faith (Rom.
Keller ties a little bow on that section of the message saying that the doctrine of hell «can be used to create a pretext for cruelty,» but that the «
biblical doctrine of hell» is that Jesus came «not to bring judgment but to bear judgment and to go to hell for his enemies.»
Using as his criterion
the biblical doctrine of the Incarnation, Thomas Ogletree recently issued a positive evaluation of process thought.
In a recent sermon at the 75th annual convention of Nation Religious Broadcasters, Warren emphasized
the biblical doctrine of the Imago Dei as the basis for universal solidarity.
6 But see H. H. Rowley's discussion of «Election without Covenant,»
The Biblical Doctrine of Election (London, 1950) PP. 121 if.
Alan Richardson,
The Biblical Doctrine of Work, Ecumenical Biblical Studies, No. 1 (London: SCM Press, 1952), p. 53.
The Biblical Doctrine of Work.
If you have questions about
the biblical doctrine of election, this excellent book by Shawn Lazar will help you see why and who God elects.
There is, of course, much more to be said, but this is not the time or place to develop a full - fledged
Biblical doctrine of God in the context of interfaith dialogue.
What questions and issues do you have about
the biblical doctrines of election and predestination?
Not exact matches
Read the actual history
of the
doctrine of «hell» and you will see that it is NOT a
biblical idea.
First, I think if they had IDENTICAL versions
of Jesus and the
biblical doctrine matched the aliens exactly, then I would say you have made a case.
The Assembly heard «progressive» theologians attempt to advance new formulations
of the gospel, and felt the strength
of Orthodoxy and evangelical Protestantism in asserting
biblical doctrines.
November 25, 1981 — Is named Prefect
of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith; President
of the
Biblical Commission and
of the Pontifical International Theological Commission.
You hit the nail squarely on the head for indeed so,
biblical truths are «written on our heart» by way
of the Presence
of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound
doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author
doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance
of the
Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author
Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.
This just captured so many
of my thoughts and questions concerning
Biblical laws, picking and choosing
doctrine, etc..
The twenty - first - century Church owes a lot to twentieth - century German Catholicism: for its generosity to Catholics in the Third World; for the witness
of martyrs like Alfred Delp, Bernhard Lichtenberg, and Edith Stein; for its contributions to
Biblical studies, systematic and moral theology, liturgical renewal, and Catholic social
doctrine, through which German Catholicism played a leading role in Vatican II's efforts to renew Catholic witness for the third millennium.
Perhaps today the
doctrine of the resurrection
of the dead is simply too particular, too specific, too...
biblical.
How do you know that this wasn't part
of God's judgment for splitting up the Christian body through denominations, creating structures that we call «church» and creating
doctrine that isn't even
biblical?
Last week a controversial book
of theology was condemned by well - established critics who cautioned the public that the book did not present Christian
doctrine in an accurate,
biblical, or traditional way.
If experience is more important than
doctrine, and no
doctrine is immune to revision» both
of which are conclusions
of Olson's postconservatives» how do we know that our fresh readings are not derived as much from our experience as from the
biblical text?
But the corollary
doctrine that the Jews were condemned to wander the earth as visible evidence
of God's judgment so thoroughly muddied the
biblical teaching that Christians in both communions, Protestant and Catholic, were blind to the escalating existential threat to Jews in Germany and elsewhere.
If the
doctrine of biblical inerrancy is inaccurate then I would certainly have some concerns since the Bible claims to be perfect (Ps.
• «What is the
biblical view and Christian experience
of the operation
of the Holy Spirit, and is it right and helpful to understand the work
of God outside the Church in terms
of the
doctrine of the Holy Spirit?»
Colin Gunton has astutely observed that «the Christian
doctrine of God is for much
of its history a hybrid
of two organisms,» namely the
biblical understanding
of God as living and dynamic, and the Greek categories [49]
of absolute perfection.
After attempting to find a
Biblical base for a kenotic
doctrine of Incarnation, he turns and finds a philosophical base for it in the metaphysics
of Hegel.
I still believe these things to be true and
biblical, but I am now aware
of different ways
of approaching these
doctrines which require further study on my part.
At most it demonstrates that certain process
doctrines are compatible with certain alleged tenets
of the theology
of some
Biblical writings.
It appears in the end to be that the
doctrine of analogy is required only for the preservation
of the
Biblical language about God.
White - head has shown us the powerful effects over two millenia
of Plato's
doctrine of the soul, especially as it was combined with
Biblical ideas.36 The relevance
of his thought, judged by immediate consequences, was all too limited.
The
doctrines of God derived from this influence have stood through the centuries in marked tension with
Biblical personalism.
It is some such claim as this: Such - and - such a
doctrine in process theology is truly in accord with tenets
of some
Biblical theology.
The second sort
of argument, designed to show that certain process
doctrines are compatible with certain
Biblical texts, was warranted by interpretations
of certain
Biblical texts that were hacked by exegetical studies.
Without losing ontological Process
doctrine of identity, God undergoes God is compatible growth in God's knowledge and with a
Biblical therewith change in God's description
of God «being.»
If the
doctrine itself is not explicit in the Bible, and if its implications are not admitted in the Bible, it is hard to see how the
doctrine can be defended on the basis
of Biblical revelation.
Well, one could justify the orthodoxy
of Scotus»
doctrine from patristic and
biblical sources and there are books that do so.
«The blame can not be laid at the door
of those who are seeking to be faithful, who are saying «look we want to be an Episcopal Church, we believe in bishops, but we believe in
biblical bishops who hold to sound
doctrine and publically refute false
doctrine and false behaviour.»
But it is by no means easy to see what
doctrine of God's being can be more adequate to the
biblical faith.
More will be said on the
Biblical view
of man later, but it is sufficient to point out here, that it is just because the Bible hardly anywhere reflects a
doctrine of an immortal soul, that the Christian hope took the form
of the resurrection
of the body.
We have already noted the conflict which runs through most
of Christian thought between the
biblical vision
of God as the creative and redemptive actor in the history
of his creation, and the metaphysical
doctrine inherited from the synthesis
of the Christian faith with neo-platonic philosophy which conceives God as the impassible, non-temporal absolute.
Nygren gives an important suggestion about the history
of doctrine when he says that the Church Fathers were saved from falling completely into a Greek pattern
of thought by the three
biblical assertions
of Creation, Incarnation, and Resurrection.32 But rather than conclude, as Nygren does, that these themes require us to reject all metaphysics, why not say that they require us to reconsider our metaphysics?
What he concludes involves rejection
of some traditional
doctrines, but it resonates well with much
biblical thinking and Christian experience.
, A New Take on 2 Timothy 3:16, Is the
Doctrine of Inspiration
Biblical?)
My first question has to do with Altizer's interpretations
of Biblical passages and
of traditional Christian
doctrines.