Not exact matches
The Old Testament's early
idea of man in his social relationships could be inferred on a priori grounds from the early
Biblical idea of God.
Indeed, it requires a difficult tour de force
of imagination for the modern mind to grasp the
ideas of man's inner nature characteristic
of Biblical religion.
I have faithfully tried to present an objective, factual picture
of unfolding
Biblical thought, but it will doubtless be evident that the central
ideas of Scripture, in whatever changing categories they may be phrased, seem to me the hope
of man's individual and social life.
I think the
biblical writings written by
men were canonized and catalogued by
men...
men of their times... and that they had, each one separate and different...
ideas of God that they wanted to communicate... and that this served their political, social, cultural, and religious ends, etc..
Niebuhr developed his
biblical view
of man under the
idea that
man is both in the image
of God, and a self - venerating sinner.
In the case
of King Saul (the
biblical narrative
of preference for those on the «less supportive» side
of the support - oppose the president spectrum), the scripture is clear that God wasn't thrilled about the
idea of a monarchy in Israel at all, but did indeed choose Saul to be the
man to occupy it (1 Samuel 8:1 - 22).
For far from being a deviation from
biblical truth, this setting
of man over against the sum total
of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality
of things themselves, are posited in the very
idea of creation and
of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition
of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees
of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon
of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal
of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1962).
The churches I grew up in had and taught very strict and well - defined
ideas of what a
man and a woman was and should be, and what a
biblical man and a
biblical woman should be.
In fact, the
idea is to convene a meeting with the religious leaders
of the main religions to make all people aware
of the state
of our climate and the tragedy
of social exclusion starting from the
biblical message that
man is the steward
of nature and
of its environmental and human development according to its potential and not against it, as Paul IV intended.