The book begins, properly, with Sacred Scripture, «the soul of theology», and examines
biblical ideas of intercession, concluding that «the New Testament encourages human beings to intercede for each other, a possibility precisely because of the mediation or intercession of Christ.
The basis of
Biblical ideas of substitution — one bearing the sin and penalty of all — was corporate personality, where in deepest earnest the sin of one was regarded as being the sin of all, the punishment due to one as being due to all, and the sacrifice of one, as in the case of Jephthah's daughter, as being offered by all.
Biblical ideas of atonement root back in this basic soil and stem out from it; and while the development later carried them to branches far distant from the roots, there is no understanding the topmost twig — for example, «as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive» --(I Corinthians 15:22.)
The Old Testament's early idea of man in his social relationships could be inferred on a priori grounds from the early
Biblical idea of God.
And indeed, as theologian Charles McCoy emphasizes in discussing
the biblical idea of covenant, God is always faithful (CCE 355 - 375).
The biblical idea of covenant embraced by earlier Americans is something deeper and more profound and more binding than a contract; it also engages another party, a party who transcends the agreements that we strike among ourselves.
But in Beyond Humanism and elsewhere he expresses the idea that the new conception of God is not only philosophically superior to that of classical philosophies and theologies, it is also theologically and religiously more adequate in that it is much more compatible with
the Biblical idea of God as love.
«Now with that out of the picture, and people getting the impression that they have a right to perfect certitude and perfect clarity and perfect order every step of the way, you've basically — I'm gonna say it strongly — you've basically destroyed
the biblical idea of faith to begin with.»
Maimonides» attempt to expunge anthropomorphism thus can not be reconciled with
this biblical idea of a God who showed an impassioned love for one particular human being and his descendants.
The Biblical idea of the final end envisions a community of persons united to each other in mutual love and to God in loving adoration.
We are here close to
the biblical idea of «patience» (hypomone), resistance.
Chuck roots his missional ideas in what he sees as
the biblical idea of mission.
The genuinely
biblical idea of government does not point to modern democratic society but to Brigham Young and the theocracy of the Mormons.
The biblical idea of revelation as God's promise has both auditory and visual overtones.
It's all about encouraging couples to make a formal commitment to one another in exactly the same way you would make
the Biblical idea of covenant.»
It was a controversial interpretation for many, as it contradicted religious beliefs about human origins; the short, stocky limb bones and the skull's oversized brow suggested an ape - like ancestor that did not fit in with
the biblical idea of God's creation.
It challenges students to think about popular images of love and how this compares with
the Biblical idea of agape.
A global Iriai is deeply poetic in comparison, it conjures
the biblical idea of a stewardship of nature — but using the most modern ideas, methods and technologies.
Not exact matches
Lance Gilman, owner
of the Mustang Ranch and the promoter behind Reno's bid, hatched the
idea for a «
biblical» armada
of graders and earthmovers to show how quickly he could prep his site.
Lance Gilman, owner
of the Mustang Ranch and the promoter behind Reno's bid, hatched the
idea for a «
biblical» armada
of graders and earthmovers to show how quickly he could prep his site.Photo by Winni Wintermeyer for Fortune
Read the actual history
of the doctrine
of «hell» and you will see that it is NOT a
biblical idea.
The crucial point to be attended to here is that, when the
idea of a physical resurrection finally appears (incipiently in Ezekiel and fully in Daniel), it builds on a
biblical foundation.
These are in no way original
ideas or thoughts from Calvin, simply the reiteration
of the
biblical writers expression
of the sovereignty
of God.
The convictionâ $» endemic among churchfolkâ $» persists that, if problems
of misapprehension and misrepresentation are overcome and the gospel can be heard in its own integrity, the gospel will be found attractive by people, become popular, and, even, be a success
of some sortâ $ ¦ This
idea is both curious and ironical because it is bluntly contradicted in Scripture and in the experience
of the continuing
biblical witness in history from the event
of Pentecost unto the present momentâ $ (William Stringfellow, quoted in A Keeper
of the Word, p. 348).
That
biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions
of the American
idea: that government stood under the judgment
of divine and natural law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm
of conscience; that national greatness was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed in the world by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
The atheists are fighting a campaign against Fundamentalist Christians who are trying to run for President
of the United States and change our laws to suit their ridiculous
biblical ideas.
The
idea embodied in this scripture is why Mormons don't accept the exra -
Biblical creeds and some
of the mainstream orthodoxy
of today.
The
idea's presented in this article does not embody the
biblical ideal
of the church as a community.
At the other extreme are theologies that take the best
of contemporary thought as normative and then explain what sense can be made
of basic
biblical ideas in this context.
And, Jeremy, would you please look at topic
of commonly - heard
ideas that may or may not have
biblical basis — one mentioned in these comments — is that God chooses the time
of our death.
It is probable that some prejudice against
biblical criticism has been aroused among religious persons by this half - conscious association
of ideas.
We had more than 300 people apply to be part
of the launch team for A Year
of Biblical Womanhood, and because I absolutely hate not including everyone — especially when just about everyone had amazing
ideas and meaningful words
of encouragement — I've left the selection process to my team at Thomas Nelson.
My disagreements with the five points
of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or understanding
of Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition of certain biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, et
Biblical texts, but with something much more basic than that: their definition
of certain
biblical words and theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, et
biblical words and theological
ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness
of sins, etc, etc..
Downing takes it a step further and says, «it is no coincidence that the concept
of biblical inerrancy developed in nineteenth - century England almost simultaneously with Darwin's
idea of natural selection: both were influenced by Enlightenment empiricism.»
Or the
biblical writers»
idea of what is a good person?
Judged by the dominant
biblical understanding
of divine transcendence, Otto's
idea of the Holy (which Berger adopts) and Berger's sacred canopy are not transcendent at all!
Biblical spirituality inculcated the
idea of suffering as redemptive, and invited a response
of altruistic caring from others.
As such, it is never merely the repetition
of biblical ideas alone, even for those holding to the sole and binding authority
of Scripture as God's revelation.
Of the three books, it may be the most practical, though the other two lay the
biblical and theological groundwork for the
ideas in this book.
Yet the early Church itself, when it departed from
biblical idiom at the Council
of Nicea and used for theological purposes a non-
biblical word, homo - ousion, as the guarantor
of true
biblical meaning, gave Christians in later days a charter for translation — provided always that it is the gospel, its setting and its significance, that we are translating, and not some bright and novel
ideas of our own.
can any catholic provide me with any prayer from the bible to a deceased person in heaven, or can you provide me a
biblical example
of the
idea of intercession
of prayers?
Indeed, it requires a difficult tour de force
of imagination for the modern mind to grasp the
ideas of man's inner nature characteristic
of Biblical religion.
So, contrary to what the cartoon suggests, the ONLY reason people promote the
idea of sexual purity is because
of biblical authority.
All
of this — his deeply felt
ideas, his
biblical knowledge, his autodidactical education, and his convoluting development
of a theme — shows to clear effect in what most critics think his greatest story, «Bartleby the Scrivener: A Story
of Wall Street.»
Smith reminds readers
of the
idea of divine accommodation, which suggests that «in the process
of divine inspiration, God did not correct every incomplete or mistaken viewpoint
of the
biblical authors in order to communicate through them with their readers... The point
of the inspired scripture was to communicate its central point, not to straighten out every kink and dent in the views
of all the people involved in
biblical inscripturation and reception along the way.»
White - head has shown us the powerful effects over two millenia
of Plato's doctrine
of the soul, especially as it was combined with
Biblical ideas.36 The relevance
of his thought, judged by immediate consequences, was all too limited.
Let me know if you have any
ideas or questions, and stay tuned for Mimi Haddad, president
of Christians for
Biblical Equality.
So this is my
idea for a book, A Year
of Biblical Manhood.
Having, therefore, lived for years with
Biblical scholars as my friends and colleagues and in the classroom having dealt with students, trying to gain a coherent and usable understanding
of the Bible for practical purposes, I have dared the attempt to put together developments
of ideas which the separate
Biblical disciplines leave apart.
In so doing they reject a
biblical conception
of God and the
idea of obedience to God as the chief form
of religious action.