In the third paragraph I, upfront, indicated my bias as to what I believe is
the Biblical precedence which is that fallen mankind has the inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts which biased my interpretation of John 6:25 - 71 — and my interpretation indicates that section of Scripture can be understood (interpreted) to be consistent with the precedence I mentioned.
His subject, as one might expect, was theology and the philosophy of science, and he argued that the
biblical concept of the Holy spirit may provide the missing link, so to speak, in the controversy over whether mind or language has
precedence in the creation of human thought.