Even the most secular
Biblical scholars agree that the Gospels were completed by 100 AD.
Modern
biblical scholars agree that the new testament scriptures were written 35 to 90 years after the alleged events, regardless who wrote them (Piso or not).
Pat, most
Biblical scholars agree that the books we know as the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were not written by the guys whose names are on the books.
Most
Biblical scholars agree Abraham was a myth, as well as Isaac, and Jacob.
Sorry mark, but you have been told numerous times that actual
biblical scholars agree that the prostîtute story in john is a fake.
You do realize that 2 Peter pseudepigraphical epistle, and that almost
every biblical scholar agrees that Peter did not write it?
Not exact matches
Hmmm... I guarantee there isn't a credible bible
scholar out there that would
agree with one of her
biblical translations.
Besides, not one
Biblical scholar would
agree with you.
You said, «Besides, not one
Biblical scholar would
agree with you.»
MOST
biblical scholars do not
agree with that, SOME do.
Virtually all modern
scholars of antiquity
agree that Jesus existed, [5][6][7][8] and
biblical scholars and cla ssical historians regard theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted.
The fact that
biblical scholars, many of whom have made it their full - time job to study the origins of the many books of the Bible, can't
agree on it's authenticity should at least leave you with some doubt about it's authenticity.
According to Bart Ehrman, most
biblical scholars (secular and non-secular)
agree that some of the letters attributed to Paul are actually forgeries.
JM — real
biblical scholars (the ones who didn't get their degrees from pretend colleges) all
agree that your story from John is a fraud.
However, we
agree with many
Biblical scholars that the Bible has been translated many times.
A point on which
biblical scholars are
agreed is that in the preaching and teaching of the apostolic church, it was Jesus himself as Christ the Lord, the Son of God, the Savior that became the central message.
It is generally
agreed among
biblical scholars that in these servant passages, the prophet was not referring to a particular individual but was calling his people to become the suffering servant of all mankind.
A book that
biblical scholars can not even
agree on who wrote it.
As I once mentioned before, most
biblical scholars (secular and non-secular)
agree that several of the books in the bible (new and old testament) are forgeries and several others are attributed to people who did not write them.
Hmmm... there are lots of Christian ministers and
Biblical scholars who don't
agree with you.
Here are two non-apologetic
biblical scholars that
agree with Jesus as myth.
Every
Biblical scholar does not
agree that all the Bible was written at least 70 years after Christ's death.
Every
biblical scholar in the world
agrees that all of the Gospels, as they exist today, were written at least 70 years after the death of Jesus (assuming he existed).
But when asked to prepare a selection of
biblical poems for publication, Kugel a noted
scholar and poet, author of the highly praised book The Bible as It Was, and former poetry editor of Harper's magazine
agreed to do so.