Sentences with phrase «biblical scholars no»

In large part, it developed back in the early days of the church when many of the Biblical scholars spoke and wrote Greek.

As I once mentioned before, most biblical scholars (secular and non-secular) agree that several of the books in the bible (new and old testament) are forgeries and several others are attributed to people who did not write them.

In fact, the more that biblical scholars penetrate into the record, the more enigmatic and uncertain that record becomes.

Over the centuries, biblical scholars have offered widely differing views about «the Gospel.»

The apocalyptic passages are too deeply imbedded in the Gospels for most biblical scholars to feel that they can be thus disposed of.

Elaine Pagels, one of the world's leading biblical scholars, first read Revelation as a teenager.

The fact that Nicene views prevailed, and have been defended over and over again by great theologians and biblical scholars down the centuries, only confirms the conclusion that the Nicene Fathers correctly discerned the meaning of Scripture on the vital issue of the nature of Christ.

We come now to one of the outstanding biblical scholars and theologians of the century, Rudolf Bultmann.

Nearly every commentary I consulted, including those most lauded among biblical scholars, identifies Esther as a diaspora story, composed by an unknown author in the 4th of 5th century BC.

A few days after the biblical scholars» conference in San Francisco, Robinson was back in Egypt.

As has been indicated, the biblical scholars as a result of their studies still differ not only as to the interpretation but the accuracy of the records of the sayings of Jesus.

Most biblical scholars see this as a mistaken interpretation.

Now, in their letter, Collins and Walls again offer no answer to Newman's question, but only reinforce their appeal to consensus by pointing out that Nicaea has been «defended over and over again by great theologians and biblical scholars down the centuries.»

Both biblical scholars and archaeologists reacted against the biblical archaeology framework.

Joining with other feminist biblical scholars such as Phyllis Trible and Elizabeth Schussler Fiorenza, Brock reinterprets the Bible in light of women's experiences.

Although 1Timothy mentions the gospel of Luke it is believed by 80 % of biblical scholars to be pseudepigraphic.

The Protestant reformers were biblical scholars.

You are the one who CLAIMS you know more about translating the Bible than apparently ALL of the biblical scholars who worked on the translations.

Biblical scholars reach the same conclusion about Isaiah.

Why is it neither of you is willing to show your credentials as Biblical scholars?

You are the ones who need to present your qualifications as biblical scholars.

Yet, some biblical scholars point out that this passage can only refer to the homosexual acts of heterosexual persons.7 This is because the writers of the Bible did not distinguish between a homosexual orientation and same - gender sexual acts.

JEDP is an outdated understanding of biblical criticism and has been discarded by most mainline Abrahamic biblical scholars for over a decade.Other than your whole JEDP point for argument, you deliver a modestly sound criticism of biblical criticism and interpretation.

Some biblical scholars belief that Eygpt will have a shift in relations with Israel and once again become an enemy!

Biblical scholars concerned with the roles of men and women in biblical cultures point out that the love ethic of the early church was so revolutionary in its day that it was considered a threat to social order in the Roman Empire.

But try as I might, I just can't believe that the Five Books of Moses were written by J, E, P and D — the four main authors whose oral traditions, biblical scholars say, were cobbled together to make the Torah.

Furthermore, there are first - rank theologians and biblical scholars who, though they have rejected the crude literalism of a descent of Christ through the clouds as the mythological product of a prescientific age, nevertheless use the language of a second coming to designate the final consummation of the kingdom.

Biblical scholars date this sermon as early as the reign of Hezekiah or as late as the time of Ezekiel.

A book that biblical scholars can not even agree on who wrote it.

This article reminds Biblical scholars of the need to consider the implications of racism in the history of scholarship within their discipline, and points out that «the place of race in the formation of our discipline remains unrecognized and invisible.

The name of Martin Dibelius, of the University of Heidelberg, is well known among Biblical scholars throughout the world.

With biblical scholars, however, you often feel like they're flying just a little blinder than everyone else.

The preacher who is doing his reading these days has been encouraged by the fact that there are a number of recent attempts «to find a new way through from exegesis to the sermon».1 That these efforts among biblical scholars, systematic theologians, and practical theologians are taking place has several clear implications.

As with any field of research that tries to reconstruct the distant past, biblical scholars get things wrong on a daily basis.

Biblical scholars have recently turned to the social sciences for clearer insights into the social forces that molded faith communities in Scripture, all in an effort to sharpen the reading and interpretation of the Bible.

Parables have suffered under the rationalism and idealist orientation of biblical scholars ever since Adolf Jülicher uttered his dictum in i886 that every parable has one and only one central point.

For example, it is the opinion of not a few biblical scholars that the love commandments in the Fourth Gospel and the epistles of John, so often quoted to stress the universality of the Christian ethic, were originally understood as applying only within the Christian community, and as in the Old Testament «Love your neighbor» meant «Love your fellow Israelite,» so the corresponding «new commandment» was taken to mean, «Love your fellow Christian.

From one angle, this finding of the biblical scholars, that we can not say with certainty that we have the exact words of Jesus, relieves the dilemma.

Biblical scholars could avoid the hermeneutical question for so long precisely because the scholar, having projected his interest onto the text, could regain it only vicariously through the «objective» restatement of what lay in the text, without any reference to himself or his community.

Few practicing biblical scholars would take exception to this, even those who speak of God's acts in history, since these are generally viewed as mediated through the selfhood of human agents.

While Matthew is essentially just presenting the same arguments various biblical scholars have been making for decades, he summarized the position so well, it's worth sharing for discussion.

Biblical scholars must resist the temptation of establishing themselves as scribal mandarins jealously pocketing the keys of knowledge.

It is generally agreed among biblical scholars that in these servant passages, the prophet was not referring to a particular individual but was calling his people to become the suffering servant of all mankind.

Even after the compilation of the Talmud in the first centuries CE, there have been continuous commentaries by Biblical scholars from then to the present, including some as widely regarded and respected as Rashi.

Regarding Jesus» message, there is a very impressive consensus among Biblical scholars that (whatever John and Paul might say) Jesus did not claim that he himself was God, either explicitly or implicitly.

Of course it is a simple task to find others, including many outstanding biblical scholars, who share his views on the proper analysis of this passage.

A committee of theologians and biblical scholars directs the project from Minnesota.

Biblical scholars have been saying for generations that Gog must be Russia.»

A point on which biblical scholars are agreed is that in the preaching and teaching of the apostolic church, it was Jesus himself as Christ the Lord, the Son of God, the Savior that became the central message.

We have been down this road before and the sources have been provided and there are countless more examples of biblical scholars coming to the same conclusion.