Not exact matches
Never - the-less, I am fascinated by
biblical scholarship, the history of the early church, and
at any rate think people should have the correct facts about what was written and what the original authors meant it to mean.
This is theological exegesis
at its finest: informed by historical - critical
scholarship, but going far beyond the
biblical dissecting room to show how the experience of the Risen Christ both formed the Church and impelled it into mission.
And it's unlike any other book I've ever written, for in addition to the memoir, it includes original poetry, short stories, soliloquies, and even a short screenplay — all aimed
at capturing the wonder and beauty of Scripture, while honoring the best in
biblical scholarship and acknowledging the challenges of its most difficult passages.
It was in this way that fundamentalism, under the guise of evangelicalism, was becoming more dominant in the churches
at the very same time as academic theology and
biblical scholarship were becoming more radical.
This can be regarded as a form of liberal theology; so
at this point I will simply argue that Wesley would support no holds barred
biblical scholarship and rethink his teaching in its light.
A great gap has opened up between
biblical and theological
scholarship on the one hand, and what went on
at the parish level on the other.
Point being, here's the far left fringe of
biblical scholarship — and you regard him as winking
at your position (when he's giving a scathing treatment of it).
It's as if they are implying that the collective
scholarship of the various teams of
biblical interpreters was somehow insufficient, naive, biased or
at the very least less informed than their own interpretation of the word.
In drawing up the «schemata» that would be discussed by the council fathers, they aimed
at raising to the level of permanently binding Catholic doctrine the broad rejection of modern developments in
biblical scholarship and theology that had been the norm in Rome since the modernist crisis
at the beginning of the twentieth century.
«Because the NIV was introduced about 30 years ago, the translation needed to be refreshed to reflect advances in
biblical scholarship and changes in English usage,» said committee member Karen H. Jobes, associate professor of New Testament
at Westmont College near Santa Barbara, California.
At once it claimed the eager attention of
Biblical scholarship.
It is a bit ironic that increased attention is being paid to the
biblical theme of covenant just
at a time when
biblical scholarship is moving on to other constructs for interpretation.
When a man with no
biblical training whatsoever is considered more qualified to teach than a woman with a PhD in theology or a woman whose work in New Testament
scholarship is renowned the world over, we are not seeing complementariaism
at work, but patriarchy.
This perspective had been sharpened by a year's study
at Berlin, but it is striking that his interests
at that time were such that he did not attend any lectures in theology, even those of Harnack.5 Although he developed great appreciation for Harnack in later years, he worked out his own approach to
Biblical scholarship by applying to the scriptures methods developed with other subject matters in view.
From
biblical scholarship alone, for example, we probably know more today about the life and times of Jesus than was known
at any period since the second generation of Christians.
Perhaps the author is better when it comes to
biblical scholarship and you should stick to your own area that you're better
at, which is something else.
I realize this may not be clear or meaninful to some readers and I can't take the space here to go into it other than to say that a good segment of
biblical scholarship for a couple decades
at least, has properly broadened its pursuits in an interdisciplinary manner, into probing for better understandings of the nature and formative, growth processes of the earliest groups of Jesus followers and how they ultimately became Jewish Christian groups, or started as mixed Jewish / Gentile groups (as via Paul, et al.).
The purpose of this appendix, then, is to summarize the results of modern
Biblical scholarship concerning the resurrection, to look
at the conclusions reached by those whom I will call the «minimalists», and to evaluate their arguments and proposals.