Not exact matches
Buber calls his treatment of
Biblical history «tradition
criticism» as distinct from «
source criticism.»
Whereas Wellhausen had challenged the historical reliability of the
biblical account on the grounds that it was compiled from multiple
sources that originated long after the events reported, his intellectual successors a century later were employing methodologies (such as rhetorical
criticism and narrative
criticism) that seemed to assume that the
biblical writers were not particularly concerned with historical accuracy anyhow.
And what
biblical scholars have called literary
criticism —
source analysis, the search for the author and his intention, redaction
criticism as usually practiced (with some recent exceptions), etc. — are really forms of historical
criticism.
As a result, what they called literary
criticism was rapidly reduced to the search for the written
sources lying behind the
biblical books.
An important footnote to this chapter in the development of modern
biblical scholarship is the fact that
source criticism was often called (and still is sometimes called) «literary
criticism.»