It is one very simple way to tell if the numbers you get in your reports from your publishers are accurate — or at least not as
big a piece of fiction as the book they published for you.
Not exact matches
But what's interesting, especially about that one, and that one [is a]
piece written by Larry Greenemeier, was that, you know, all the popular science
fiction treatments
of that kind have it [suddenly] happening and conflict between humans but through Larry's reporting it seems more likely that we will see it coming; that machine self - awareness will occur in a certain kind
of stepwise fashion where they're getting better at certain tasks; [that they'll be able to do] autonomous activities, and from there that you can actually see them develop, and it shouldn't come up as a
big surprise as it if finally happens.
That's harder said than done, resulting in a relationship that not only feels more real than most
of the films this year, but plays a
big part in its success as a romantic dramedy and an enchanting
piece of science
fiction.
But given the title, we're inclined to assume it's a science
fiction tale with a
Big Idea, possibly linked to a certain large
piece of equipment over at CERN.
That's harder said than done, resulting in a relationship that not only feels more real than most
of the films last year, but plays a
big part in its success as a romantic dramedy and an enchanting
piece of science
fiction.
This morning he posted «The Seduction
of Narrative,» a
piece that helpfully aggregates some
of the best commentary on the
big misstep by the public radio show «This American Life» in running Mike Daisey's
fiction - laced accounts
of Apple's manufacturing problems in China.