Blackbody temperature calculations tell us about the planet's overall temperature according to the radiation it receives.
Not exact matches
His non-GHG atmosphere permits the lower surface to constantly radiate to the upper surface until the two have identical
temperatures in a textbook
blackbody radiation
calculation.
The rest of his argument is just that
blackbody calculations don't produce real surface
temperatures.
However
blackbody calculations do not speak to high and low surface
temperatures and how these are distributed over cycles in time, across surface space or throughout the atmosphere.
Its main argument is that idealized
blackbody calculations did not correctly predict the Moon's surface
temperatures in the 1960s because other factors besides radiative heat transfer equations actually determine real surface
temperatures.
(This situation I have been attempting to indicate for a few years, and is seen in many differing portions of «
calculation conceptualisations» including the remittance behaviors of molecules being presented as «
blackbody» radiation linked to «atmospheric
temperature» when the reverse is the reality, these photons present the energy NOT retained as a «kinetic gain», thus have no link to «atmospheric» molecular
temperature.)