Also, when an individual requests any of the actions I now refuse to take, I gently let them know I don't do those actions and some I send to the ALLi (Alliance of Independent Authors)
Ethical Code, which I signed and promote on my
blog, GLADLY: http://www.theindependentpublishingmagazine.com/2014/11/alli-launch-
ethical-author-
code.html Go read it.
For instance, one might expect comments: 1) identifying
ethical problems in legal scholarship that are given too little attention; 2) identifying the most important or urgent
ethical problems in legal scholarship, even if they are already given attention; 3) asking questions about the definition of «scholarship» or «legal scholarship,» what counts as legal scholarship, and what kinds of norms, if any, should apply to writing by law professors as law professors but outside scholarly forums, such as tweets,
blog posts, «law professors» letters,» op - eds, and so on; 4) proposing specific
ethical norms for legal scholarship, especially those that might, as it were, be part of a Restatement or
code of the ethics of legal scholarship; and 5) raising general questions, positive or critical, about what the conference should try to achieve or whether it is possible to achieve anything at all.