In People v. Colorado Springs Board of REALTORS ®, the Colorado Supreme Court addressed the reasonableness of
Board membership criteria as it related to MLS access.
Not exact matches
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, determining the
criteria for
membership to the
Board and recommending candidates for election to the
Board.
Such recommendations must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the
criteria for
Board membership, including issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity, age, independence, skills, education, expertise, business acumen, business experience, length of service, understanding of the Company's business, other commitments and the like, as well as any personal references and an indication of the candidate's willingness to serve.
Membership into AATA's Premier 100 requires the satisfaction of stringent
criteria and standards established by the AATA
Board of Directors, including notable verdicts, settlements and achievements.
Comment: A few commenters requested clarification of the term «conflict of interest» as it pertained to the proposed rule's
criteria for IRB and privacy
board membership.
We believe that the revised
membership criterion for the unaffiliated member of the privacy
board, and the
criterion that requires that the
board have no member participating in a review of any project in which the member has a conflict of interest, are sufficient to ensure that no member of the
board has a conflict of interest in a research proposal under their review.
Therefore, in the final rule, we have modified one of the
membership criteria for privacy
board to require that the
board has members with varying backgrounds and appropriate professional competency as necessary to review the effect of the research protocol on the individual's privacy rights and related interests.
However, under the final rule, IRBs and privacy
board members could include patient advocates provided they met the required
membership criteria in § 164.512 (i).
Any State Association which fails to enforce the minimum service
criteria may, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, be expelled by the
Board of Directors from
membership in the National Association.
Any Member
Board that fails to satisfy the minimum service
criteria may, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, be expelled by the
Board of Directors from
membership in the National Association.
The court held that
membership criteria which gave a
Board the means to restrict access to the MLS were potentially anti-competitive and constituted an impermissible group boycott under Rule of Reason analysis.
The court held that
membership criteria which gave a
Board the means to restrict access to the MLS were potentially anti-competitive and constituted an impermissible group boycott under Rule of Reason...
Criteria: Based on the last 12 months as a DAAR member
Board Activity — 40 %
Board office and committee work, handling of special assignments, seminar activity, educational work, and
membership / offices held in local chapters of institutes, councils, and societies.
D, REALTOR ® Members (Primary Active REALTOR ® and REALTOR - Associate ®) are defined as...» shall be any individual engaged in the real estate profession as a principal, partner, corporate officer, or branch manager acting on behalf of the firm's principal (s), and licensed or certified individuals affiliated with said REALTOR ® Member whose place of business is located in an area outside the jurisdiction of any
Board who meets the qualification for REALTOR ®
membership established by the Association, which must be consistent with NAR's
membership qualification
criteria.»
The supreme court also affirmed the lower court holding that the
Board's
membership criteria were reasonable and its rule against non-member MLS participation was lawful.
The complaint did not allege that the
membership criteria were unreasonable, but rather advanced the theory of Glendale
Board of REALTORS ® v. Hounsell, 72 Cal.