On April 8, 1969 the Arlington Heights Park District
Board of Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 260, «An Ordinance Defining Misdemeanors and Providing Penalties for Such Misdemeanors.»
Not exact matches
Adopted by the
Board of Park
Commissioners 2014.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE
Board of Commissioners of the Oak Brook Park District, DuPage and Cook Counties, Illinois, will conduct a public hearing regarding the proposed budget and appropriations ordinance for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 2018 and ending April 30, 2019, at the Oak Brook Park District, Family Recreation Center, 1450 Forest Gate Road, Oak Brook, Illinois, Monday, April 16, 2018, at 6:30 PM, during the Regular Meeting
of the
Board of Commissioners, at which time the proposed Budget and Appropriation Ordinance will be
adopted.
«The obstacles include the lack
of a current SED
commissioner, the learning curve
of newly confirmed members to the
Board of Regents, the confusion amongst the
Board relative to the
adopted language, and growing opposition from both parents and education professionals.»
Such procedures shall assure that copies
of each violent or disruptive incident report at the building or program level are retained for period prescribed by the
commissioner in the applicable records retention schedule, and are available for inspection by the department upon request; provided that a district or
board that
adopts an electronic reporting system may fulfill such requirement by retaining an electronic record
of the information reported at the building or program level.
In 2016, the
Board of County
Commissioners adopted Ordinance 55.035, to create an Animal Services Advisory
Board.
«The application was based on the
commissioner's allegation that a certain rule
adopted by the
board is anti-competitive because it substantially lessons competition among Realtors in the Greater Toronto Area who are members
of the
board,» says the court's Reasons for Judgment, written by Justice J. A. Sharlow.
«The application was based on the
commissioner's allegation that a certain rule
adopted by the
board is anti-competitive because it substantially lessens competition among Realtors in the Greater Toronto Area who are members
of the
board,» said the Federal Court
of Appeal's Reasons for Judgment, written by Justice J. A. Sharlow.