Jeffery Wilson: «Case Commentary: Bruker v. Marcovitz and the Matter of Damages for
Breach of Obligations Covered by Family Law Legislation: Frame v. Smith re-visited», (2008), 21 Ont.
Not exact matches
It
covers a wide range
of considerations, including: the date the BIT enters into force; the timing
of the alleged
breach; whether there is an identifiable investor; whether there is an identifiable investment; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation;
breach of the
obligation to provide full protection and security, most - favoured nation provisions and their implications; «umbrella clauses» and their implications; whether there are explicitly incorporated procedural requirements to be followed; whether there is sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case
of breach of a BIT; the value
of the claim; and «just and equitable» damages.
He is unlikely to get the benefit
of an indemnity for this, since it would almost certainly be a
breach of his
obligations to the LLP, but in practice he should not worry, since the risk is the same to the LLP's insurers, and the Law Society's minimum terms and conditions require insurers to
cover individuals in such circumstances, and top - up insurers should be required to do so as well.
As provided in the HIPAA
Breach Notification Rule, covered entities, upon discovery of a breach of unsecured PHI, may have up to three separate notification obligations, depending upon the number of affected indivi
Breach Notification Rule,
covered entities, upon discovery
of a
breach of unsecured PHI, may have up to three separate notification obligations, depending upon the number of affected indivi
breach of unsecured PHI, may have up to three separate notification
obligations, depending upon the number
of affected individuals:
The rule now stipulates, however, that if the
covered entity is unable to cure a material
breach of the business associate's
obligation under the contract, it is expected to terminate the contract, when feasible.
(ii) A
covered entity is not in compliance with the standards in § 164.502 (e) and paragraph (e)
of this section, if the
covered entity knew
of a pattern
of activity or practice
of the business associate that constituted a material
breach or violation
of the business associate's
obligation under the contract or other arrangement, unless the
covered entity took reasonable steps to cure the
breach or end the violation, as applicable, and, if such steps were unsuccessful:
Some
of these situations are likely to be
covered by express provisions
of the outsourcing agreement, e.g. outsourcing agreements normally provide that it is not a
breach of the confidentiality
obligations for a party to disclose confidential information to the extent required by applicable law.